THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 15, 2020 A - GROUP - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 20:10 ON 09/16/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CHANTAL WILSON BC 8103 5 0 211 62 100 62.00% 1 BARRY DEVOCHT BC 8119 3 2 211 61 100 61.00% 1 STEVE BISHOP BC 8115 3 2 208 58 100 58.00% 1 JOY DEVOCHT BC 8139 3 2 193 51 100 51.00% 1 RON DUMONT BC 5081 4 1 189 49 100 49.00% 2 CIRIL NOVAK BC 2241 4 1 215 65 100 65.00% 2 LORENZO FERRARA BC 4218 2 3 181 47 100 47.00% 2 METOD NOVAK BC 2240 1 4 163 44 100 44.00% 2 PHIL ERICKSON BC 0651 0 5 167 40 100 40.00% 2 ORLANDO PELLIZZARI BC 2108 0 5 129 29 100 29.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CHANTAL WILSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CIRIL NOVAK W 38/37 11 20 55.00 1 RON DUMONT 2 PHIL ERICKSON W 37/28 11 20 55.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT 1 JOY DEVOCHT 2 METOD NOVAK W 47/34 14 20 70.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 46/21 14 20 70.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA W 43/34 12 20 60.00 1 STEVE BISHOP (Was 41%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 62 100 62.00 1??? BARRY DEVOCHT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JOY DEVOCHT 2 PHIL ERICKSON W 44/41 12 20 60.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA W 42/35 12 20 60.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON 2 METOD NOVAK L 39/41 12 20 60.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK L 34/36 9 20 45.00 1 RON DUMONT 1 STEVE BISHOP 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 52/30 16 20 80.00 (Was 51%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 61 100 61.00 1??? STEVE BISHOP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 METOD NOVAK W 41/36 12 20 60.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA L 38/40 11 20 55.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK L 44/46 12 20 60.00 1 RON DUMONT 2 PHIL ERICKSON W 48/31 14 20 70.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 37/26 9 20 45.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT 1 BARRY DEVOCHT 1 CHANTAL WILSON (Was 49%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 58 100 58.00 1??? JOY DEVOCHT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BARRY DEVOCHT 2 CIRIL NOVAK L 36/43 9 20 45.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 40/26 10 20 50.00 2 METOD NOVAK W 42/26 12 20 60.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON 2 LORENZO FERRARA L 37/41 10 20 50.00 1 STEVE BISHOP 2 PHIL ERICKSON W 38/34 10 20 50.00 1 RON DUMONT (Was 36%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 51 100 51.00 1??? RON DUMONT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LORENZO FERRARA W 39/31 10 20 50.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON 2 METOD NOVAK W 36/26 9 20 45.00 1 STEVE BISHOP 2 CIRIL NOVAK L 35/53 9 20 45.00 2 PHIL ERICKSON W 43/33 12 20 60.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 36/26 9 20 45.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT (Was 30%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 49 100 49.00 2??? CIRIL NOVAK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 37/38 11 20 55.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT W 43/36 13 20 65.00 1 STEVE BISHOP W 46/44 14 20 70.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI 1 RON DUMONT W 53/35 17 20 85.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT W 36/34 10 20 50.00 2 PHIL ERICKSON 2 METOD NOVAK 2 LORENZO FERRARA (Was 57%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 65 100 65.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 RON DUMONT L 31/39 7 20 35.00 1 STEVE BISHOP W 40/38 11 20 55.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT L 35/42 9 20 45.00 2 PHIL ERICKSON 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI 1 JOY DEVOCHT W 41/37 11 20 55.00 2 METOD NOVAK 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 34/43 9 20 45.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK (Was 39%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 47 100 47.00 2 METOD NOVAK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 STEVE BISHOP L 36/41 11 20 55.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI 1 RON DUMONT L 26/36 5 20 25.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 26/42 7 20 35.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT W 41/39 12 20 60.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 34/47 9 20 45.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA 2 CIRIL NOVAK 2 PHIL ERICKSON (Was 41%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 44 100 44.00 2??? PHIL ERICKSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI 1 BARRY DEVOCHT L 41/44 11 20 55.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 28/37 6 20 30.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA 1 STEVE BISHOP L 31/48 7 20 35.00 1 RON DUMONT L 33/43 8 20 40.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 34/38 8 20 40.00 2 METOD NOVAK (Was 42%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 40 100 40.00 2??? ORLANDO PELLIZZARI - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 PHIL ERICKSON 2 METOD NOVAK 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 26/40 7 20 35.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK 2 LORENZO FERRARA 1 STEVE BISHOP L 26/37 5 20 25.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 21/46 4 20 20.00 1 RON DUMONT L 26/36 5 20 25.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT L 30/52 8 20 40.00 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 29 100 29.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 15, 2020 B - GROUP - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 20:10 ON 09/16/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CLAYTON WHITE BC 4194 5 0 206 59 100 59.00% 1???DEDAR DILLON BC 8003 3 2 168 41 100 41.00% 1???LYNN COUSINS BC 5230 2 3 125 31 100 31.00% 1 MARLENE HARGREAVES BC 1065 1 4 136 29 100 29.00% 1 SHARON DUNN BC 6505 0 5 101 12 100 12.00% 2???KEVIN KOSTIK BC 5325 3 2 173 49 100 49.00% 2???JIM WILLIAMS BC 5337 3 2 144 38 100 38.00% 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN BC 0024 3« 1« 143 37 100 37.00% 2???NORMAN ROY BC 0029 2 3 133 29 100 29.00% 2 DON FLEMING BC 5327 2« 2« 126 20 100 20.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CLAYTON WHITE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SHARON DUNN 2 DON FLEMING W 47/25 15 20 75.00 2 NORMAN ROY W 36/18 10 20 50.00 2 JIM WILLIAMS W 40/26 12 20 60.00 1 DEDAR DILLON 2 KEVIN KOSTIK W 43/26 12 20 60.00 1 LYNN COUSINS 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN W 40/32 10 20 50.00 1 MARLE HARGREAVES (Was 22%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 59 100 59.00 1??? DEDAR DILLON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DON FLEMING Tie 28/28 5 20 25.00 1 MARLE HARGREAVES 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN Tie 28/28 5 20 25.00 1 SHARON DUNN 1 CLAYTON WHITE 2 JIM WILLIAMS W 38/23 11 20 55.00 2 NORMAN ROY W 47/31 15 20 75.00 2 KEVIN KOSTIK L 27/47 5 20 25.00 1 LYNN COUSINS (Was 26%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 41 100 41.00 1??? LYNN COUSINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JIM WILLIAMS L 25/31 6 20 30.00 2 KEVIN KOSTIK W 29/18 8 20 40.00 2 DON FLEMING L 20/23 5 20 25.00 1 MARLE HARGREAVES 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN L 23/24 6 20 30.00 2 NORMAN ROY W 28/27 6 20 30.00 1 CLAYTON WHITE 1 SHARON DUNN 1 DEDAR DILLON (Was 34%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 31 100 31.00 1 MARLENE HARGREAVES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 KEVIN KOSTIK L 28/45 5 20 25.00 1 DEDAR DILLON 2 JIM WILLIAMS L 25/35 6 20 30.00 1 LYNN COUSINS 2 DON FLEMING W 28/21 5 20 25.00 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN L 29/31 8 20 40.00 1 SHARON DUNN 2 NORMAN ROY L 26/33 5 20 25.00 1 CLAYTON WHITE (Was 22%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 29 100 29.00 1 SHARON DUNN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CLAYTON WHITE 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN L 23/28 4 20 20.00 2 KEVIN KOSTIK L 22/37 4 20 20.00 1 DEDAR DILLON 2 JIM WILLIAMS L 20/29 2 20 10.00 2 DON FLEMING L 21/29 2 20 10.00 1 MARLE HARGREAVES 1 LYNN COUSINS 2 NORMAN ROY L 15/24 0 20 None (Was 37%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 12 100 12.00 2??? KEVIN KOSTIK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MARLE HARGREAVES W 45/28 14 20 70.00 1 LYNN COUSINS L 18/29 3 20 15.00 1 SHARON DUNN W 37/22 11 20 55.00 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN 2 NORMAN ROY 1 CLAYTON WHITE L 26/43 6 20 30.00 2 JIM WILLIAMS 1 DEDAR DILLON W 47/27 15 20 75.00 2 DON FLEMING (Was 39%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 49 100 49.00 2??? JIM WILLIAMS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 LYNN COUSINS W 31/25 8 20 40.00 2 NORMAN ROY 1 MARLE HARGREAVES W 35/25 9 20 45.00 1 CLAYTON WHITE L 26/40 7 20 35.00 1 SHARON DUNN W 29/20 7 20 35.00 1 DEDAR DILLON L 23/38 7 20 35.00 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 38 100 38.00 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 NORMAN ROY 1 SHARON DUNN W 28/23 7 20 35.00 1 DEDAR DILLON Tie 28/28 7 20 35.00 1 LYNN COUSINS W 24/23 6 20 30.00 1 MARLE HARGREAVES W 31/29 8 20 40.00 2 DON FLEMING 1 CLAYTON WHITE L 32/40 9 20 45.00 2 JIM WILLIAMS (Was 33%) TOTALS W 3« L 1« 37 100 37.00 2??? NORMAN ROY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SIDNEY DEHAAN 2 JIM WILLIAMS 1 CLAYTON WHITE L 18/36 2 20 10.00 2 DON FLEMING 1 LYNN COUSINS L 27/28 7 20 35.00 1 DEDAR DILLON L 31/47 7 20 35.00 1 MARLE HARGREAVES W 33/26 8 20 40.00 1 SHARON DUNN W 24/15 5 20 25.00 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 29 100 29.00 2 DON FLEMING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DEDAR DILLON Tie 28/28 6 20 30.00 1 CLAYTON WHITE L 25/47 4 20 20.00 1 LYNN COUSINS W 23/20 3 20 15.00 2 NORMAN ROY 1 MARLE HARGREAVES L 21/28 2 20 10.00 1 SHARON DUNN W 29/21 5 20 25.00 2 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 20 100 20.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 15, 2020 C - GROUP - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 20:10 ON 09/16/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BOB MCCAULEY BC 5358 5 0 230 72 100 72.00% 1 PAT STEVENS BC 5061 5 0 215 63 100 63.00% 1???RICHARD STEVENS BC 8032 4 1 190 55 100 55.00% 1???WEI XIAO BC 1471 4 1 197 54 100 54.00% 1???NICK NICHOLAS BC 1044 1 4 113 20 100 20.00% 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS BC 1401 3 2 213 67 100 67.00% 2???DWIGHT COUSINS BC 6003 1 4 143 33 100 33.00% 2???BILL BRUSSEE BC 1801 1 4 136 28 100 28.00% 2???DON MYRFIELD BC 1929 1 4 126 26 100 26.00% 2 BERNIE LEPPER BC 3696 0 5 112 22 100 22.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BOB MCCAULEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DON MYRFIELD W 47/22 15 20 75.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 44/23 13 20 65.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS W 49/25 15 20 75.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS 2 BERNIE LEPPER W 43/27 14 20 70.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 47/46 15 20 75.00 1 PAT STEVENS 1 RICHARD STEVENS 1 WEI XIAO (Was 61%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 72 100 72.00 1 PAT STEVENS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 NICK NICHOLAS 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 43/40 13 20 65.00 2 DON MYRFIELD W 42/28 12 20 60.00 1 WEI XIAO 2 DWIGHT COUSINS W 45/25 13 20 65.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER W 42/24 13 20 65.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 43/24 12 20 60.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS (Was 32%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 63 100 63.00 1??? RICHARD STEVENS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DWIGHT COUSINS W 34/28 9 20 45.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS 2 BERNIE LEPPER W 43/22 13 20 65.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 37/31 10 20 50.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 33/44 10 20 50.00 2 DON MYRFIELD W 43/16 13 20 65.00 1 WEI XIAO 1 BOB MCCAULEY 1 PAT STEVENS (Was 35%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 55 100 55.00 1??? WEI XIAO - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BERNIE LEPPER W 46/20 14 20 70.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS W 41/25 11 20 55.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 34/46 9 20 45.00 1 PAT STEVENS 1 NICK NICHOLAS 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 37/27 10 20 50.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS 2 DON MYRFIELD W 39/29 10 20 50.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY (Was 37%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 54 100 54.00 1??? NICK NICHOLAS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 PAT STEVENS 1 RICHARD STEVENS 2 BILL BRUSSEE L 14/31 2 20 10.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY 1 WEI XIAO 2 DWIGHT COUSINS L 24/40 5 20 25.00 2 DON MYRFIELD L 22/31 3 20 15.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER W 24/19 4 20 20.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 29/37 6 20 30.00 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 20 100 20.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BILL BRUSSEE 1 PAT STEVENS L 40/43 12 20 60.00 1 WEI XIAO W 46/34 15 20 75.00 2 DON MYRFIELD 1 RICHARD STEVENS W 44/33 13 20 65.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 46/47 15 20 75.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER 2 DWIGHT COUSINS 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 37/29 12 20 60.00 (Was 56%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 67 100 67.00 2??? DWIGHT COUSINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 28/34 6 20 30.00 1 WEI XIAO L 25/41 5 20 25.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 25/49 5 20 25.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER 1 PAT STEVENS L 25/45 5 20 25.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 40/24 12 20 60.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS 2 DON MYRFIELD (Was 30%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 33 100 33.00 2??? BILL BRUSSEE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 23/44 4 20 20.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 31/14 8 20 40.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 31/37 7 20 35.00 2 DON MYRFIELD 1 WEI XIAO L 27/37 5 20 25.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS 1 PAT STEVENS L 24/43 4 20 20.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER (Was 15%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 28 100 28.00 2??? DON MYRFIELD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 22/47 3 20 15.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER 1 PAT STEVENS L 28/42 6 20 30.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS 2 BILL BRUSSEE 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 16/43 2 20 10.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 31/22 8 20 40.00 1 WEI XIAO L 29/39 7 20 35.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS (Was 28%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 26 100 26.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 WEI XIAO L 20/46 3 20 15.00 2 DON MYRFIELD 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 22/43 3 20 15.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 27/43 6 20 30.00 1 PAT STEVENS L 24/42 5 20 25.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS 1 NICK NICHOLAS L 19/24 5 20 25.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE (Was 15%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 22 100 22.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 15, 2020 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 20:10 ON 09/16/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1???TOM HAMAKAWA BC 7505 3 2 159 41 100 41.00% 1 JEANETTE FERRARA BC 4214 4 1 147 34 100 34.00% 1???BRUCE MILLER BC 2257 3 2 134 32 100 32.00% 1???JEAN PAUL BOURGOIN BC 2235 3 2 122 25 100 25.00% 1???BOB PRICE BC 2230 3« 1« 108 22 100 22.00% 2???JENNA JOHN BC 5105 3« 1« 176 54 100 54.00% 2 MARCIE NORQUAY BC 5211 4 1 139 38 100 38.00% 2???DOROTHY MILLER BC 5140 0 5 90 12 100 12.00% 2???MURIEL SCALLON BC 1116 0 5 85 11 100 11.00% 2 BETTY HART BC 5208 1 4 89 11 100 11.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1??? TOM HAMAKAWA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DOROTHY MILLER W 24/19 6 20 30.00 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 39/11 10 20 50.00 2 JENNA JOHN L 35/42 10 20 50.00 1 BOB PRICE 2 BETTY HART W 32/14 9 20 45.00 2 MARCIE NORQUAY L 29/33 6 20 30.00 1 JEANETTE FERRARA 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN 1 BRUCE MILLER (Was 37%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 41 100 41.00 1 JEANETTE FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BOB PRICE 2 MARCIE NORQUAY W 36/26 9 20 45.00 2 DOROTHY MILLER W 32/23 8 20 40.00 1 BRUCE MILLER 2 JENNA JOHN Tie 23/23 4 20 20.00 2 BETTY HART Tie 26/26 6 20 30.00 1 TOM HAMAKAWA 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 30/19 7 20 35.00 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN (Was 29%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 34 100 34.00 1??? BRUCE MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BETTY HART W 30/12 8 20 40.00 2 JENNA JOHN L 25/45 6 20 30.00 2 MARCIE NORQUAY L 17/19 3 20 15.00 1 JEANETTE FERRARA 1 BOB PRICE 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 31/23 7 20 35.00 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN 2 DOROTHY MILLER W 31/16 8 20 40.00 1 TOM HAMAKAWA (Was 27%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 32 100 32.00 1??? JEAN PAUL BOURGOIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JENNA JOHN L 24/44 5 20 25.00 1 BOB PRICE 2 BETTY HART W 22/19 5 20 25.00 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 19/12 3 20 15.00 2 MARCIE NORQUAY L 28/34 6 20 30.00 2 DOROTHY MILLER W 29/14 6 20 30.00 1 BRUCE MILLER 1 TOM HAMAKAWA 1 JEANETTE FERRARA (Was 27%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 25 100 25.00 1??? BOB PRICE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JEANETTE FERRARA 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN 2 MURIEL SCALLON W 24/20 6 20 30.00 1 TOM HAMAKAWA 1 BRUCE MILLER 2 JENNA JOHN W 28/22 6 20 30.00 2 DOROTHY MILLER W 19/18 3 20 15.00 2 BETTY HART Tie 18/18 3 20 15.00 2 MARCIE NORQUAY L 19/27 4 20 20.00 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 3« L 1« 22 100 22.00 2??? JENNA JOHN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN W 44/24 14 20 70.00 1 BRUCE MILLER W 45/25 15 20 75.00 1 TOM HAMAKAWA W 42/35 13 20 65.00 2 BETTY HART 1 JEANETTE FERRARA Tie 23/23 6 20 30.00 1 BOB PRICE L 22/28 6 20 30.00 2 MURIEL SCALLON 2 MARCIE NORQUAY 2 DOROTHY MILLER (Was 44%) TOTALS W 3« L 1« 54 100 54.00 2 MARCIE NORQUAY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MURIEL SCALLON 1 JEANETTE FERRARA L 26/36 6 20 30.00 1 BRUCE MILLER W 19/17 5 20 25.00 2 DOROTHY MILLER 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN W 34/28 10 20 50.00 1 TOM HAMAKAWA W 33/29 9 20 45.00 2 BETTY HART 2 JENNA JOHN 1 BOB PRICE W 27/19 8 20 40.00 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 38 100 38.00 2??? DOROTHY MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM HAMAKAWA L 19/24 4 20 20.00 2 BETTY HART 1 JEANETTE FERRARA L 23/32 3 20 15.00 2 MARCIE NORQUAY 2 MURIEL SCALLON 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN L 14/29 1 20 5.00 1 BOB PRICE L 18/19 2 20 10.00 1 BRUCE MILLER L 16/31 2 20 10.00 2 JENNA JOHN (Was 17%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 12 100 12.00 2??? MURIEL SCALLON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MARCIE NORQUAY 1 TOM HAMAKAWA L 11/39 0 20 None 1 BOB PRICE L 20/24 3 20 15.00 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN L 12/19 2 20 10.00 2 DOROTHY MILLER 1 BRUCE MILLER L 23/31 4 20 20.00 2 JENNA JOHN 1 JEANETTE FERRARA L 19/30 2 20 10.00 2 BETTY HART (Was 12%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 11 100 11.00 2 BETTY HART - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BRUCE MILLER L 12/30 2 20 10.00 2 DOROTHY MILLER 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN L 19/22 2 20 10.00 2 JENNA JOHN 1 TOM HAMAKAWA L 14/32 0 20 None 1 JEANETTE FERRARA Tie 26/26 5 20 25.00 2 MARCIE NORQUAY 1 BOB PRICE Tie 18/18 2 20 10.00 2 MURIEL SCALLON (Was 5%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 11 100 11.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 15, 2020 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB - CLASS B (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 20:10 ON 09/16/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 AL GUSHTA BC 1504 5 0 123 27 100 27.00% 1???DALE WALCH BC 1103 5 0 124 24 100 24.00% 1???LORNE AMES BC 2000 5 0 107 19 100 19.00% 1???KEVIN SCALLON BC 1115 5 0 107 17 100 17.00% 1???GORDON JULES BC 5104 5 0 86 11 100 11.00% 2= NEIL LAROCQUE BC 6051 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% 2= EDWIN KRIEG BC 1474 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% 2= BEN GARTNER BC 5012 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% 2= JACK JOHNSON BC 8014 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% 2= AMY KIDD BC 8036 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 AL GUSHTA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 LORNE AMES 2 JACK JOHNSON W 32/0 8 20 40.00 2 NEIL LAROCQUE W 22/0 5 20 25.00 1 DALE WALCH 2 EDWIN KRIEG W 22/0 5 20 25.00 2 AMY KIDD W 25/0 6 20 30.00 1 GORDON JULES 1 KEVIN SCALLON 2 BEN GARTNER W 22/0 3 20 15.00 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 27 100 27.00 1??? DALE WALCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 AMY KIDD W 26/0 5 20 25.00 1 GORDON JULES 2 JACK JOHNSON W 34/0 8 20 40.00 1 AL GUSHTA 1 LORNE AMES 2 EDWIN KRIEG W 20/0 3 20 15.00 2 BEN GARTNER W 23/0 4 20 20.00 2 NEIL LAROCQUE W 21/0 4 20 20.00 1 KEVIN SCALLON (Was 20%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 24 100 24.00 1??? LORNE AMES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 AL GUSHTA 2 AMY KIDD W 21/0 4 20 20.00 2 BEN GARTNER W 23/0 4 20 20.00 2 EDWIN KRIEG W 21/0 3 20 15.00 1 DALE WALCH 2 NEIL LAROCQUE W 22/0 3 20 15.00 1 KEVIN SCALLON 2 JACK JOHNSON W 20/0 5 20 25.00 1 GORDON JULES (Was 15%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 19 100 19.00 1??? KEVIN SCALLON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 EDWIN KRIEG W 21/0 3 20 15.00 2 NEIL LAROCQUE W 18/0 2 20 10.00 2 AMY KIDD W 21/0 3 20 15.00 1 GORDON JULES 2 JACK JOHNSON W 20/0 3 20 15.00 2 BEN GARTNER W 27/0 6 20 30.00 1 LORNE AMES 1 AL GUSHTA 1 DALE WALCH (Was 22%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 17 100 17.00 1??? GORDON JULES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 NEIL LAROCQUE W 19/0 3 20 15.00 1 DALE WALCH 2 EDWIN KRIEG W 16/0 2 20 10.00 1 KEVIN SCALLON 2 AMY KIDD W 17/0 1 20 5.00 2 JACK JOHNSON W 13/0 2 20 10.00 1 AL GUSHTA 2 BEN GARTNER W 21/0 3 20 15.00 1 LORNE AMES (Was 6%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 11 100 11.00 2= NEIL LAROCQUE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 GORDON JULES L 0/19 0 20 None 1 KEVIN SCALLON L 0/18 0 20 None 1 AL GUSHTA L 0/22 0 20 None 2 JACK JOHNSON 2 BEN GARTNER 1 LORNE AMES L 0/22 0 20 None 2 EDWIN KRIEG 1 DALE WALCH L 0/21 0 20 None 2 AMY KIDD (Was 27%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 2= EDWIN KRIEG - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 KEVIN SCALLON L 0/21 0 20 None 2 BEN GARTNER 1 GORDON JULES L 0/16 0 20 None 1 LORNE AMES L 0/21 0 20 None 1 AL GUSHTA L 0/22 0 20 None 1 DALE WALCH L 0/20 0 20 None 2 NEIL LAROCQUE 2 AMY KIDD 2 JACK JOHNSON (Was 26%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 2= BEN GARTNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JACK JOHNSON 2 EDWIN KRIEG 1 LORNE AMES L 0/23 0 20 None 2 AMY KIDD 2 NEIL LAROCQUE 1 KEVIN SCALLON L 0/27 0 20 None 1 DALE WALCH L 0/23 0 20 None 1 GORDON JULES L 0/21 0 20 None 1 AL GUSHTA L 0/22 0 20 None (Was 17%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 2= JACK JOHNSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BEN GARTNER 1 AL GUSHTA L 0/32 0 20 None 1 DALE WALCH L 0/34 0 20 None 2 NEIL LAROCQUE 1 KEVIN SCALLON L 0/20 0 20 None 1 GORDON JULES L 0/13 0 20 None 2 AMY KIDD 1 LORNE AMES L 0/20 0 20 None 2 EDWIN KRIEG (Was 13%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 2= AMY KIDD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DALE WALCH L 0/26 0 20 None 1 LORNE AMES L 0/21 0 20 None 1 KEVIN SCALLON L 0/21 0 20 None 2 BEN GARTNER 1 GORDON JULES L 0/17 0 20 None 1 AL GUSHTA L 0/25 0 20 None 2 JACK JOHNSON 2 EDWIN KRIEG 2 NEIL LAROCQUE (Was 33%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 Circle your High Game Percentage THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 15, 2020 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 20:10 ON 09/16/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1???BRIAN RICKABY BC 0020 3 2 162 40 100 40.00% 1 CLIFF HUMBERSTONE BC 0015 5 0 145 37 100 37.00% 1???SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 3 2 113 23 100 23.00% 1???KELVIN PHOENIX BC 0028 3 2 105 20 100 20.00% 1 DOUG FUNK BC 0026 1« 3« 91 10 100 10.00% 2= JAKE KONRAD BC 7502 3 2 117 26 100 26.00% 2= MARVIN FRIESEN BC 1953 3 2 133 26 100 26.00% 2 MARSHALL MERONIUK BC 1905 1 4 98 20 100 20.00% 2 MIKE CARNEY BC 6021 2 3 98 14 100 14.00% 2 GERALD WINTERS BC 1942 « 4« 78 12 100 12.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1??? BRIAN RICKABY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 GERALD WINTERS W 33/18 8 20 40.00 2 MARVIN FRIESEN W 35/25 10 20 50.00 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 37/21 10 20 50.00 1 KELVIN PHOENIX 2 MIKE CARNEY L 26/28 5 20 25.00 2 JAKE KONRAD L 31/34 7 20 35.00 1 DOUG FUNK 1 SUE BERTRAND 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE (Was 28%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 40 100 40.00 1 CLIFF HUMBERSTONE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MIKE CARNEY W 29/20 7 20 35.00 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 27/17 6 20 30.00 2 JAKE KONRAD W 28/16 7 20 35.00 1 DOUG FUNK 1 KELVIN PHOENIX 2 MARVIN FRIESEN W 28/26 7 20 35.00 1 SUE BERTRAND 2 GERALD WINTERS W 33/15 10 20 50.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY (Was 19%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 37 100 37.00 1??? SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK L 22/23 4 20 20.00 1 KELVIN PHOENIX 2 MIKE CARNEY W 21/17 5 20 25.00 2 MARVIN FRIESEN L 23/27 5 20 25.00 2 JAKE KONRAD W 27/22 6 20 30.00 2 GERALD WINTERS W 20/14 3 20 15.00 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE 1 BRIAN RICKABY 1 DOUG FUNK (Was 16%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 23 100 23.00 1??? KELVIN PHOENIX - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DOUG FUNK 1 SUE BERTRAND 2 MARVIN FRIESEN L 19/30 3 20 15.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 23/21 4 20 20.00 2 GERALD WINTERS W 24/17 5 20 25.00 2 MIKE CARNEY W 20/14 4 20 20.00 2 JAKE KONRAD L 19/24 4 20 20.00 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 20 100 20.00 1 DOUG FUNK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 KELVIN PHOENIX 2 JAKE KONRAD L 18/21 2 20 10.00 2 GERALD WINTERS Tie 14/14 0 20 None 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK W 26/16 5 20 25.00 2 MIKE CARNEY L 16/19 1 20 5.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY 2 MARVIN FRIESEN L 17/25 2 20 10.00 1 SUE BERTRAND (Was 13%) TOTALS W 1« L 3« 10 100 10.00 2= JAKE KONRAD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MARVIN FRIESEN 1 DOUG FUNK W 21/18 5 20 25.00 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 16/28 3 20 15.00 2 GERALD WINTERS 1 SUE BERTRAND L 22/27 4 20 20.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY W 34/31 9 20 45.00 2 MIKE CARNEY 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK 1 KELVIN PHOENIX W 24/19 5 20 25.00 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 26 100 26.00 2= MARVIN FRIESEN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JAKE KONRAD 1 BRIAN RICKABY L 25/35 4 20 20.00 1 KELVIN PHOENIX W 30/19 7 20 35.00 1 SUE BERTRAND W 27/23 5 20 25.00 2 GERALD WINTERS 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 26/28 5 20 25.00 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK 1 DOUG FUNK W 25/17 5 20 25.00 2 MIKE CARNEY (Was 12%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 26 100 26.00 2 MARSHALL MERONIUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SUE BERTRAND W 23/22 5 20 25.00 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 17/27 4 20 20.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY L 21/37 4 20 20.00 2 MIKE CARNEY 1 DOUG FUNK L 16/26 2 20 10.00 1 KELVIN PHOENIX L 21/23 5 20 25.00 2 MARVIN FRIESEN 2 JAKE KONRAD 2 GERALD WINTERS (Was 19%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 20 100 20.00 2 MIKE CARNEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 20/29 3 20 15.00 2 GERALD WINTERS 1 SUE BERTRAND L 17/21 1 20 5.00 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK 1 BRIAN RICKABY W 28/26 6 20 30.00 1 DOUG FUNK W 19/16 3 20 15.00 2 JAKE KONRAD 1 KELVIN PHOENIX L 14/20 1 20 5.00 2 MARVIN FRIESEN (Was 10%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 14 100 14.00 2 GERALD WINTERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BRIAN RICKABY L 18/33 3 20 15.00 2 MIKE CARNEY 1 DOUG FUNK Tie 14/14 2 20 10.00 2 JAKE KONRAD 2 MARVIN FRIESEN 1 SUE BERTRAND L 14/20 2 20 10.00 1 KELVIN PHOENIX L 17/24 2 20 10.00 1 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 15/33 3 20 15.00 2 MARSHAL MERONIUK (Was 13%) TOTALS W 0« L 4« 12 100 12.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 15, 2020 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC - CLASS B (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 20:10 ON 09/16/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SHELLEY EVANS BC 8128 5 0 169 41 100 41.00% 1???CHRIS VANIER BC 8133 3 2 130 27 100 27.00% 1???GAIL BISHOP BC 8114 4 1 137 27 100 27.00% 1???ELAINE MCMATH BC 8148 3 2 115 17 100 17.00% 1???PHIL OVERHILL BC 8144 3 2 99 15 100 15.00% 2???LINDA ANDERSON BC 8156 4 1 149 32 100 32.00% 2 BARB STASZKIEL BC 8152 1 4 83 12 100 12.00% 2 TAMMY POWELL BC 8151 2 3 87 10 100 10.00% 2???RON BOROSKI BC 8136 0 5 77 9 100 9.00% 2???DAVE POWELL BC 8150 0 5 60 7 100 7.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SHELLEY EVANS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LINDA ANDERSON W 33/32 8 20 40.00 2 TAMMY POWELL W 32/13 8 20 40.00 2 DAVE POWELL W 34/12 7 20 35.00 1 PHIL OVERHILL 1 ELAINE MCMATH 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 34/19 8 20 40.00 1 CHRIS VANIER 2 RON BOROSKI W 36/15 10 20 50.00 1 GAIL BISHOP (Was 25%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 41 100 41.00 1??? CHRIS VANIER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 TAMMY POWELL L 23/24 5 20 25.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH 2 LINDA ANDERSON L 26/27 5 20 25.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 24/13 3 20 15.00 2 DAVE POWELL W 27/11 6 20 30.00 2 RON BOROSKI W 30/14 8 20 40.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS 1 GAIL BISHOP 1 PHIL OVERHILL (Was 23%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 27 100 27.00 1??? GAIL BISHOP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 RON BOROSKI W 26/13 5 20 25.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 29/12 6 20 30.00 2 TAMMY POWELL W 34/17 9 20 45.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH 2 LINDA ANDERSON L 25/32 4 20 20.00 2 DAVE POWELL W 23/11 3 20 15.00 1 PHIL OVERHILL 1 CHRIS VANIER 1 SHELLEY EVANS (Was 22%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 27 100 27.00 1??? ELAINE MCMATH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 PHIL OVERHILL 1 CHRIS VANIER 2 BARB STASZKIEL L 19/22 2 20 10.00 1 GAIL BISHOP 1 SHELLEY EVANS 2 TAMMY POWELL W 24/19 4 20 20.00 2 RON BOROSKI W 21/14 3 20 15.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON L 23/31 3 20 15.00 2 DAVE POWELL W 28/16 5 20 25.00 (Was 6%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 17 100 17.00 1??? PHIL OVERHILL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ELAINE MCMATH 2 DAVE POWELL W 27/10 6 20 30.00 2 RON BOROSKI W 26/21 4 20 20.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS 2 TAMMY POWELL L 12/14 1 20 5.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON L 12/27 0 20 None 1 GAIL BISHOP 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 22/17 4 20 20.00 1 CHRIS VANIER (Was 10%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 15 100 15.00 2??? LINDA ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 32/33 7 20 35.00 2 RON BOROSKI 1 CHRIS VANIER W 27/26 6 20 30.00 2 TAMMY POWELL 1 GAIL BISHOP W 32/25 6 20 30.00 1 PHIL OVERHILL W 27/12 6 20 30.00 2 DAVE POWELL 1 ELAINE MCMATH W 31/23 7 20 35.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL (Was 4%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 32 100 32.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DAVE POWELL 1 GAIL BISHOP L 12/29 2 20 10.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH W 22/19 4 20 20.00 1 CHRIS VANIER L 13/24 1 20 5.00 2 RON BOROSKI 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 19/34 3 20 15.00 2 TAMMY POWELL 1 PHIL OVERHILL L 17/22 2 20 10.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON (Was 4%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 12 100 12.00 2 TAMMY POWELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHRIS VANIER W 24/23 5 20 25.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 13/32 0 20 None 1 GAIL BISHOP L 17/34 1 20 5.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON 1 PHIL OVERHILL W 14/12 0 20 None 1 ELAINE MCMATH L 19/24 4 20 20.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL 2 DAVE POWELL 2 RON BOROSKI (Was 6%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 10 100 10.00 2??? RON BOROSKI - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 GAIL BISHOP L 13/26 1 20 5.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON 1 PHIL OVERHILL L 21/26 4 20 20.00 2 DAVE POWELL 2 BARB STASZKIEL 1 CHRIS VANIER L 14/30 1 20 5.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH L 14/21 1 20 5.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 15/36 2 20 10.00 2 TAMMY POWELL (Was 5%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 9 100 9.00 2??? DAVE POWELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BARB STASZKIEL 1 PHIL OVERHILL L 10/27 1 20 5.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 12/34 0 20 None 2 RON BOROSKI 1 CHRIS VANIER L 11/27 1 20 5.00 1 GAIL BISHOP L 11/23 2 20 10.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON 2 TAMMY POWELL 1 ELAINE MCMATH L 16/28 3 20 15.00 (Was 7%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 7 100 7.00