THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 1, 2020 B - GROUP - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 04:09 ON 09/02/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DON FLEMING BC 5327 4 1 206 56 100 56.00% 1 JIM WILLIAMS BC 5337 4 1 179 52 100 52.00% 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN BC 0024 1 4 148 44 100 44.00% 1 DAVE ROWELL BC 5325 3 2 141 32 100 32.00% 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND BC 1619 2« 2« 139 32 100 32.00% 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS BC 1401 5 0 227 72 100 72.00% 2 DWIGHT COUSINS BC 6003 1 4 155 37 100 37.00% 2 BILL BRUSSEE BC 1801 « 4« 124 23 100 23.00% 2 BERNIE LEPPER BC 3696 2 3 126 23 100 23.00% 2 DON MYRFIELD BC 1929 2 3 121 21 100 21.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DON FLEMING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DON MYRFIELD W 46/23 13 20 65.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 42/26 11 20 55.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS W 37/34 10 20 50.00 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND 2 BERNIE LEPPER W 44/23 12 20 60.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 37/43 10 20 50.00 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN 1 JIM WILLIAMS 1 DAVE ROWELL (Was 44%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 56 100 56.00 1 JIM WILLIAMS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DWIGHT COUSINS W 36/29 11 20 55.00 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND 2 BERNIE LEPPER W 39/22 12 20 60.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 41/23 11 20 55.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 33/46 9 20 45.00 2 DON MYRFIELD W 30/24 9 20 45.00 1 DAVE ROWELL 1 DON FLEMING 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN (Was 35%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 52 100 52.00 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 32/46 10 20 50.00 2 DON MYRFIELD L 30/32 9 20 45.00 1 DAVE ROWELL 2 DWIGHT COUSINS L 30/34 9 20 45.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER L 24/30 7 20 35.00 1 DON FLEMING 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 32/29 9 20 45.00 1 JIM WILLIAMS (Was 33%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 44 100 44.00 1 DAVE ROWELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BERNIE LEPPER L 22/26 4 20 20.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS W 38/24 11 20 55.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 26/53 6 20 30.00 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 28/24 6 20 30.00 1 JIM WILLIAMS 2 DON MYRFIELD W 27/23 5 20 25.00 1 DON FLEMING (Was 39%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 32 100 32.00 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN 1 JIM WILLIAMS 2 BILL BRUSSEE Tie 22/22 4 20 20.00 1 DON FLEMING 1 DAVE ROWELL 2 DWIGHT COUSINS W 35/34 8 20 40.00 2 DON MYRFIELD L 17/19 3 20 15.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER W 32/25 8 20 40.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 33/39 9 20 45.00 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 32 100 32.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BILL BRUSSEE 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN W 46/32 15 20 75.00 1 DAVE ROWELL W 53/26 17 20 85.00 2 DON MYRFIELD 1 JIM WILLIAMS W 46/33 14 20 70.00 1 DON FLEMING W 43/37 13 20 65.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER 2 DWIGHT COUSINS 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND W 39/33 13 20 65.00 (Was 56%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 72 100 72.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JIM WILLIAMS L 29/36 5 20 25.00 1 DAVE ROWELL L 24/38 5 20 25.00 1 DON FLEMING L 34/37 9 20 45.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN W 34/30 9 20 45.00 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND L 34/35 9 20 45.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS 2 DON MYRFIELD (Was 30%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 37 100 37.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS 1 DON FLEMING L 26/42 5 20 25.00 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND Tie 22/22 3 20 15.00 1 JIM WILLIAMS L 23/41 5 20 25.00 2 DON MYRFIELD 1 DAVE ROWELL L 24/28 4 20 20.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN L 29/32 6 20 30.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER (Was 15%) TOTALS W 0« L 4« 23 100 23.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DAVE ROWELL W 26/22 4 20 20.00 2 DON MYRFIELD 1 JIM WILLIAMS L 22/39 3 20 15.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS 1 DON FLEMING L 23/44 4 20 20.00 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN W 30/24 6 20 30.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND L 25/32 6 20 30.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE (Was 15%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 23 100 23.00 2 DON MYRFIELD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DON FLEMING L 23/46 4 20 20.00 2 BERNIE LEPPER 1 SIDNEY DEHAAN W 32/30 7 20 35.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS 2 BILL BRUSSEE 1 JIM WILLIAMS L 24/30 4 20 20.00 1 DWAYNE BERTRAND W 19/17 2 20 10.00 1 DAVE ROWELL L 23/27 4 20 20.00 2 DWIGHT COUSINS (Was 28%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 21 100 21.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 1, 2020 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB- GROUP - CLASS B (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 04:09 ON 09/02/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TOM HAMAKAWA BC 7505 5 0 178 47 100 47.00% 1???JEANETTE FERRARA BC 4214 5 0 135 30 100 30.00% 1???BRUCE MILLER BC 2257 5 0 135 27 100 27.00% 1???JEAN PAUL BOURGOIN BC 2235 5 0 122 24 100 24.00% 2???BOB PRICE BC 2230 5 0 94 20 100 20.00% 2= BYE BYE BC 9999 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% 2= BYE BYE BC 9999 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% 2= BYE BYE BC 9999 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% 2= BYE BYE BC 9999 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% 2= BYE BYE BC 9999 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TOM HAMAKAWA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BYE BYE W 37/0 10 20 50.00 2 BYE BYE W 33/0 8 20 40.00 2 BYE BYE W 33/0 8 20 40.00 2 BOB PRICE 2 BYE BYE W 39/0 11 20 55.00 2 BYE BYE W 36/0 10 20 50.00 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN 1 JEANETTE FERRARA 1 BRUCE MILLER (Was 37%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 47 100 47.00 1??? JEANETTE FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BYE BYE W 21/0 4 20 20.00 2 BOB PRICE 2 BYE BYE W 26/0 4 20 20.00 2 BYE BYE W 34/0 9 20 45.00 2 BYE BYE W 25/0 5 20 25.00 2 BYE BYE W 29/0 8 20 40.00 1 BRUCE MILLER 1 TOM HAMAKAWA 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN (Was 29%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 30 100 30.00 1??? BRUCE MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BYE BYE W 30/0 6 20 30.00 2 BYE BYE W 22/0 4 20 20.00 2 BYE BYE W 28/0 6 20 30.00 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN 2 BOB PRICE 2 BYE BYE W 29/0 6 20 30.00 1 JEANETTE FERRARA 2 BYE BYE W 26/0 5 20 25.00 1 TOM HAMAKAWA (Was 27%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 27 100 27.00 1??? JEAN PAUL BOURGOIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BOB PRICE 2 BYE BYE W 24/0 5 20 25.00 2 BYE BYE W 31/0 8 20 40.00 1 BRUCE MILLER 2 BYE BYE W 21/0 4 20 20.00 2 BYE BYE W 25/0 4 20 20.00 1 TOM HAMAKAWA 2 BYE BYE W 21/0 3 20 15.00 1 JEANETTE FERRARA (Was 27%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 24 100 24.00 2??? BOB PRICE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN 1 JEANETTE FERRARA 2 BYE BYE W 23/0 5 20 25.00 1 TOM HAMAKAWA 1 BRUCE MILLER 2 BYE BYE W 25/0 5 20 25.00 2 BYE BYE W 14/0 3 20 15.00 2 BYE BYE W 10/0 2 20 10.00 2 BYE BYE W 22/0 5 20 25.00 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 20 100 20.00 2= BYE BYE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BYE BYE 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN L 0/24 0 20 None 1 BRUCE MILLER L 0/28 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 1 JEANETTE FERRARA L 0/25 0 20 None 1 TOM HAMAKAWA L 0/36 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 2 BYE BYE 2 BOB PRICE L 0/22 0 20 None (Was 1%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 2= BYE BYE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JEANETTE FERRARA L 0/21 0 20 None 1 BRUCE MILLER L 0/22 0 20 None 1 TOM HAMAKAWA L 0/33 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN L 0/21 0 20 None 2 BOB PRICE L 0/25 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 2 BYE BYE 2 BYE BYE (Was 1%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 2= BYE BYE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM HAMAKAWA L 0/37 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN L 0/31 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 2 BYE BYE 1 JEANETTE FERRARA L 0/29 0 20 None 2 BOB PRICE L 0/14 0 20 None 1 BRUCE MILLER L 0/26 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE (Was 1%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 2= BYE BYE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BYE BYE 1 TOM HAMAKAWA L 0/33 0 20 None 2 BOB PRICE L 0/23 0 20 None 1 JEANETTE FERRARA L 0/34 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 1 BRUCE MILLER L 0/29 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN L 0/21 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE (Was 1%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 2= BYE BYE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BRUCE MILLER L 0/30 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 1 JEANETTE FERRARA L 0/26 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 1 TOM HAMAKAWA L 0/39 0 20 None 1 JEAN PA BOURGOIN L 0/25 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE 2 BOB PRICE L 0/10 0 20 None 2 BYE BYE (Was 1%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 0 100 0.00 Circle your High Game Percentage THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 1, 2020 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB- GROUP - CLASS B (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 04:09 ON 09/02/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 MARCIE NORQUAY BC 5211 5 0 162 45 100 45.00% 1 JENNA JOHN BC 5105 5 0 149 42 100 42.00% 1 DOROTHY MILLER BC 5140 1« 3« 107 14 100 14.00% 1 BETTY HART BC 5208 0 5 74 6 100 6.00% 1 MURIEL SCALLON BC 1116 1 4 76 4 100 4.00% 2 DALE WALCH BC 1103 3 2 144 30 100 30.00% 2 KEVIN SCALLON BC 1115 2 3 106 15 100 15.00% 2 AL GUSHTA BC 1504 2« 2« 99 14 100 14.00% 2 LORNE AMES BC 2000 3 2 84 11 100 11.00% 2 GORDON JULES BC 5104 2 3 84 10 100 10.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 MARCIE NORQUAY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DALE WALCH W 30/25 8 20 40.00 2 LORNE AMES W 33/15 10 20 50.00 2 KEVIN SCALLON W 29/18 8 20 40.00 1 BETTY HART 2 GORDON JULES W 36/15 10 20 50.00 2 AL GUSHTA W 34/17 9 20 45.00 1 MURIEL SCALLON 1 DOROTHY MILLER 1 JENNA JOHN (Was 44%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 45 100 45.00 1 JENNA JOHN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 GORDON JULES W 28/15 8 20 40.00 2 KEVIN SCALLON W 25/20 7 20 35.00 2 AL GUSHTA W 27/20 6 20 30.00 1 MURIEL SCALLON 1 BETTY HART 2 LORNE AMES W 38/16 12 20 60.00 1 DOROTHY MILLER 2 DALE WALCH W 31/29 9 20 45.00 1 MARCIE NORQUAY (Was 44%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 42 100 42.00 1 DOROTHY MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 KEVIN SCALLON W 20/17 3 20 15.00 1 BETTY HART 2 GORDON JULES L 16/18 1 20 5.00 2 LORNE AMES L 20/21 2 20 10.00 2 AL GUSHTA Tie 27/27 4 20 20.00 2 DALE WALCH L 24/29 4 20 20.00 1 JENNA JOHN 1 MARCIE NORQUAY 1 MURIEL SCALLON (Was 17%) TOTALS W 1« L 3« 14 100 14.00 1 BETTY HART - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MURIEL SCALLON 1 DOROTHY MILLER 2 LORNE AMES L 10/14 1 20 5.00 1 MARCIE NORQUAY 1 JENNA JOHN 2 KEVIN SCALLON L 14/28 0 20 None 2 DALE WALCH L 26/29 5 20 25.00 2 GORDON JULES L 13/18 0 20 None 2 AL GUSHTA L 11/12 0 20 None (Was 5%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 6 100 6.00 1 MURIEL SCALLON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BETTY HART 2 AL GUSHTA L 11/23 0 20 None 2 DALE WALCH L 14/32 0 20 None 1 JENNA JOHN 2 KEVIN SCALLON L 14/23 0 20 None 2 GORDON JULES W 21/18 3 20 15.00 1 MARCIE NORQUAY 2 LORNE AMES L 16/18 1 20 5.00 1 DOROTHY MILLER (Was 12%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 4 100 4.00 2 DALE WALCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MARCIE NORQUAY L 25/30 5 20 25.00 2 GORDON JULES 1 MURIEL SCALLON W 32/14 7 20 35.00 2 AL GUSHTA 2 LORNE AMES 1 DOROTHY MILLER W 29/24 6 20 30.00 1 BETTY HART W 29/26 6 20 30.00 1 JENNA JOHN L 29/31 6 20 30.00 2 KEVIN SCALLON (Was 20%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 30 100 30.00 2 KEVIN SCALLON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DOROTHY MILLER L 17/20 1 20 5.00 1 JENNA JOHN L 20/25 3 20 15.00 1 MARCIE NORQUAY L 18/29 3 20 15.00 2 GORDON JULES 1 MURIEL SCALLON W 23/14 3 20 15.00 1 BETTY HART W 28/14 5 20 25.00 2 LORNE AMES 2 AL GUSHTA 2 DALE WALCH (Was 22%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 15 100 15.00 2 AL GUSHTA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LORNE AMES 1 MURIEL SCALLON W 23/11 4 20 20.00 1 JENNA JOHN L 20/27 3 20 15.00 2 DALE WALCH 1 DOROTHY MILLER Tie 27/27 4 20 20.00 1 MARCIE NORQUAY L 17/34 2 20 10.00 2 GORDON JULES 2 KEVIN SCALLON 1 BETTY HART W 12/11 1 20 5.00 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 14 100 14.00 2 LORNE AMES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 AL GUSHTA 1 MARCIE NORQUAY L 15/33 2 20 10.00 1 BETTY HART W 14/10 2 20 10.00 1 DOROTHY MILLER W 21/20 3 20 15.00 2 DALE WALCH 1 JENNA JOHN L 16/38 2 20 10.00 2 KEVIN SCALLON 1 MURIEL SCALLON W 18/16 2 20 10.00 2 GORDON JULES (Was 15%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 11 100 11.00 2 GORDON JULES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JENNA JOHN L 15/28 1 20 5.00 2 DALE WALCH 1 DOROTHY MILLER W 18/16 2 20 10.00 2 KEVIN SCALLON 1 MARCIE NORQUAY L 15/36 1 20 5.00 1 MURIEL SCALLON L 18/21 2 20 10.00 2 AL GUSHTA 1 BETTY HART W 18/13 4 20 20.00 2 LORNE AMES (Was 6%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 10 100 10.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 1, 2020 C - GROUP - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 04:09 ON 09/02/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1???CHANTAL WILSON BC 8103 4 1 225 68 100 68.00% 1 BARRY DEVOCHT BC 8119 5 0 216 63 100 63.00% 1???JOY DEVOCHT BC 8139 4 1 195 54 100 54.00% 1 STEVE BISHOP BC 8115 3 2 186 53 100 53.00% 1 RON DUMONT BC 5081 3« 1« 161 39 100 39.00% 2???CLAYTON WHITE BC 4194 4 1 206 59 100 59.00% 2 LYNN COUSINS BC 5230 1 4 140 31 100 31.00% 2 MARLENE HARGREAVES BC 1065 « 4« 135 30 100 30.00% 2???DEDAR DILLON BC 8003 0 5 135 25 100 25.00% 2???SHARON DUNN BC 6505 0 5 103 14 100 14.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1??? CHANTAL WILSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LYNN COUSINS W 43/20 13 20 65.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT 2 MARLE HARGREAVES W 43/24 13 20 65.00 2 CLAYTON WHITE L 43/46 12 20 60.00 2 SHARON DUNN W 45/22 14 20 70.00 2 DEDAR DILLON W 51/31 16 20 80.00 1 STEVE BISHOP 1 BARRY DEVOCHT 1 RON DUMONT (Was 41%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 68 100 68.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DEDAR DILLON W 47/25 14 20 70.00 2 CLAYTON WHITE W 44/42 13 20 65.00 2 LYNN COUSINS W 37/23 10 20 50.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT 2 MARLE HARGREAVES W 44/28 13 20 65.00 2 SHARON DUNN W 44/15 13 20 65.00 1 RON DUMONT 1 CHANTAL WILSON 1 STEVE BISHOP (Was 51%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 63 100 63.00 1??? JOY DEVOCHT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 RON DUMONT 1 CHANTAL WILSON 2 CLAYTON WHITE L 37/41 9 20 45.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT 1 STEVE BISHOP 2 LYNN COUSINS W 44/36 13 20 65.00 2 DEDAR DILLON W 42/30 12 20 60.00 2 MARLE HARGREAVES W 36/26 10 20 50.00 2 SHARON DUNN W 36/26 10 20 50.00 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 54 100 54.00 1 STEVE BISHOP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MARLE HARGREAVES W 39/29 12 20 60.00 2 LYNN COUSINS L 29/33 7 20 35.00 2 SHARON DUNN W 35/23 10 20 50.00 1 RON DUMONT 1 JOY DEVOCHT 2 CLAYTON WHITE L 38/40 11 20 55.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON 2 DEDAR DILLON W 45/26 13 20 65.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT (Was 49%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 53 100 53.00 1 RON DUMONT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JOY DEVOCHT 2 SHARON DUNN W 29/17 7 20 35.00 2 DEDAR DILLON W 38/23 10 20 50.00 1 STEVE BISHOP 2 LYNN COUSINS W 30/28 7 20 35.00 2 MARLE HARGREAVES Tie 28/28 6 20 30.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT 2 CLAYTON WHITE L 36/37 9 20 45.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON (Was 30%) TOTALS W 3« L 1« 39 100 39.00 2??? CLAYTON WHITE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SHARON DUNN 1 BARRY DEVOCHT L 42/44 13 20 65.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT W 41/37 12 20 60.00 1 CHANTAL WILSON W 46/43 13 20 65.00 2 DEDAR DILLON 1 STEVE BISHOP W 40/38 11 20 55.00 2 LYNN COUSINS 1 RON DUMONT W 37/36 10 20 50.00 2 MARLE HARGREAVES (Was 22%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 59 100 59.00 2 LYNN COUSINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 20/43 2 20 10.00 1 STEVE BISHOP W 33/29 8 20 40.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT L 23/37 5 20 25.00 2 MARLE HARGREAVES 1 RON DUMONT L 28/30 7 20 35.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 36/44 9 20 45.00 2 CLAYTON WHITE 2 SHARON DUNN 2 DEDAR DILLON (Was 34%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 31 100 31.00 2 MARLENE HARGREAVES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 STEVE BISHOP L 29/39 8 20 40.00 2 DEDAR DILLON 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 24/43 5 20 25.00 2 LYNN COUSINS 1 BARRY DEVOCHT L 28/44 6 20 30.00 1 RON DUMONT Tie 28/28 6 20 30.00 2 SHARON DUNN 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 26/36 5 20 25.00 2 CLAYTON WHITE (Was 22%) TOTALS W 0« L 4« 30 100 30.00 2??? DEDAR DILLON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BARRY DEVOCHT L 25/47 6 20 30.00 2 MARLE HARGREAVES 1 RON DUMONT L 23/38 3 20 15.00 2 SHARON DUNN 2 CLAYTON WHITE 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 31/51 6 20 30.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 30/42 6 20 30.00 1 STEVE BISHOP L 26/45 4 20 20.00 2 LYNN COUSINS (Was 26%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 25 100 25.00 2??? SHARON DUNN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CLAYTON WHITE 1 RON DUMONT L 17/29 2 20 10.00 1 STEVE BISHOP L 23/35 3 20 15.00 2 DEDAR DILLON 1 CHANTAL WILSON L 22/45 3 20 15.00 1 BARRY DEVOCHT L 15/44 1 20 5.00 2 MARLE HARGREAVES 2 LYNN COUSINS 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 26/36 5 20 25.00 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 14 100 14.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 1, 2020 A - GROUP - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 04:09 ON 09/02/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BOB MCCAULEY BC 5358 5 0 235 72 100 72.00% 1???PAT STEVENS BC 5061 2 3 170 53 100 53.00% 1 RICHARD STEVENS BC 8032 5 0 191 52 100 52.00% 1= WEI XIAO BC 1471 2« 2« 183 46 100 46.00% 1 NICK NICHOLAS BC 1044 0 5 104 20 100 20.00% 2 CIRIL NOVAK BC 2241 3 2 191 57 100 57.00% 2= PHIL ERICKSON BC 0651 2« 2« 182 46 100 46.00% 2???METOD NOVAK BC 2240 2 3 163 43 100 43.00% 2???LORENZO FERRARA BC 4218 2 3 161 38 100 38.00% 2 ORLANDO PELLIZZARI BC 2108 1 4 134 30 100 30.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BOB MCCAULEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 PAT STEVENS 2 PHIL ERICKSON W 43/35 13 20 65.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA W 53/29 17 20 85.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS 2 METOD NOVAK W 42/29 13 20 65.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK W 48/29 14 20 70.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS 1 WEI XIAO 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 49/21 15 20 75.00 (Was 61%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 72 100 72.00 1??? PAT STEVENS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BOB MCCAULEY 2 CIRIL NOVAK L 34/39 11 20 55.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 37/30 12 20 60.00 2 METOD NOVAK L 32/34 10 20 50.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS 2 LORENZO FERRARA W 30/27 9 20 45.00 1 WEI XIAO 2 PHIL ERICKSON L 37/39 11 20 55.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS (Was 32%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 53 100 53.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CIRIL NOVAK W 39/35 10 20 50.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS 2 PHIL ERICKSON W 39/31 11 20 55.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY 1 PAT STEVENS 2 METOD NOVAK W 34/31 9 20 45.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 38/29 11 20 55.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA W 41/34 11 20 55.00 1 WEI XIAO (Was 35%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 52 100 52.00 1= WEI XIAO - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 METOD NOVAK W 39/26 11 20 55.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA L 33/38 7 20 35.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK L 38/49 10 20 50.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS 2 PHIL ERICKSON Tie 37/37 9 20 45.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 36/25 9 20 45.00 1 PAT STEVENS 1 BOB MCCAULEY 1 RICHARD STEVENS (Was 37%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 46 100 46.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LORENZO FERRARA L 10/33 1 20 5.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS 2 METOD NOVAK L 20/43 3 20 15.00 1 WEI XIAO 2 CIRIL NOVAK L 21/39 5 20 25.00 2 PHIL ERICKSON L 26/40 5 20 25.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI L 27/29 6 20 30.00 1 PAT STEVENS (Was 31%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 20 100 20.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 35/39 10 20 50.00 1 PAT STEVENS W 39/34 12 20 60.00 1 WEI XIAO W 49/38 15 20 75.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 39/21 12 20 60.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 29/48 8 20 40.00 2 PHIL ERICKSON 2 METOD NOVAK 2 LORENZO FERRARA (Was 57%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 57 100 57.00 2= PHIL ERICKSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 35/43 8 20 40.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 31/39 6 20 30.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA 1 WEI XIAO Tie 37/37 10 20 50.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 40/26 11 20 55.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK 1 PAT STEVENS W 39/37 11 20 55.00 2 METOD NOVAK (Was 42%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 46 100 46.00 2??? METOD NOVAK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 WEI XIAO L 26/39 7 20 35.00 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 43/20 13 20 65.00 1 PAT STEVENS W 34/32 8 20 40.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 29/42 7 20 35.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 31/34 8 20 40.00 2 LORENZO FERRARA 2 CIRIL NOVAK 2 PHIL ERICKSON (Was 41%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 43 100 43.00 2??? LORENZO FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 33/10 7 20 35.00 1 WEI XIAO W 38/33 11 20 55.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 29/53 6 20 30.00 2 PHIL ERICKSON 2 ORLAN PELLIZZARI 1 PAT STEVENS L 27/30 6 20 30.00 2 METOD NOVAK 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 34/41 8 20 40.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK (Was 39%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 38 100 38.00 2 ORLANDO PELLIZZARI - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 PHIL ERICKSON 2 METOD NOVAK 1 PAT STEVENS L 30/37 7 20 35.00 2 CIRIL NOVAK 2 LORENZO FERRARA 1 WEI XIAO L 25/36 6 20 30.00 1 RICHARD STEVENS L 29/38 6 20 30.00 1 NICK NICHOLAS W 29/27 6 20 30.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 21/49 5 20 25.00 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 30 100 30.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 1, 2020 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC - CLASS A (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 04:09 ON 09/02/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1???SHELLEY EVANS BC 8128 4 1 165 40 100 40.00% 1 CHRIS VANIER BC 8133 5 0 138 29 100 29.00% 1???GAIL BISHOP BC 8114 3 2 128 21 100 21.00% 1???PHIL OVERHILL BC 8144 1« 3« 101 11 100 11.00% 1 ELAINE MCMATH BC 8148 1 4 90 9 100 9.00% 2???BRIAN RICKABY BC 0020 4 1 189 49 100 49.00% 2???CLIFF HUMBERSTONE BC 0015 3 2 139 33 100 33.00% 2???DOUG FUNK BC 0026 1« 3« 92 17 100 17.00% 2 SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 2 3 98 14 100 14.00% 2 KELVIN PHOENIX BC 0028 0 5 73 6 100 6.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1??? SHELLEY EVANS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SUE BERTRAND W 30/14 6 20 30.00 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE W 40/28 11 20 55.00 2 BRIAN RICKABY L 28/40 7 20 35.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH 2 DOUG FUNK W 35/22 8 20 40.00 2 KELVIN PHOENIX W 32/12 8 20 40.00 1 PHIL OVERHILL 1 GAIL BISHOP 1 CHRIS VANIER (Was 25%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 40 100 40.00 1 CHRIS VANIER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BRIAN RICKABY W 33/30 9 20 45.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH 2 DOUG FUNK W 26/15 5 20 25.00 1 GAIL BISHOP 1 PHIL OVERHILL 2 SUE BERTRAND W 35/20 8 20 40.00 2 KELVIN PHOENIX W 23/13 5 20 25.00 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE W 21/20 2 20 10.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS (Was 23%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 29 100 29.00 1??? GAIL BISHOP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 PHIL OVERHILL 2 DOUG FUNK W 22/15 4 20 20.00 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 26/27 4 20 20.00 1 CHRIS VANIER 2 SUE BERTRAND W 25/20 4 20 20.00 2 BRIAN RICKABY L 27/38 4 20 20.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH 1 SHELLEY EVANS 2 KELVIN PHOENIX W 28/15 5 20 25.00 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 21 100 21.00 1??? PHIL OVERHILL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 GAIL BISHOP 2 BRIAN RICKABY L 27/36 4 20 20.00 2 KELVIN PHOENIX W 17/15 1 20 5.00 2 SUE BERTRAND L 18/22 1 20 5.00 1 CHRIS VANIER 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 18/35 2 20 10.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS 2 DOUG FUNK Tie 21/21 3 20 15.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH (Was 10%) TOTALS W 1« L 3« 11 100 11.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 17/29 0 20 None 1 CHRIS VANIER 2 SUE BERTRAND L 19/22 2 20 10.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS 2 BRIAN RICKABY L 17/45 2 20 10.00 2 DOUG FUNK L 16/19 2 20 10.00 1 GAIL BISHOP 2 KELVIN PHOENIX W 21/18 3 20 15.00 1 PHIL OVERHILL (Was 6%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 9 100 9.00 2??? BRIAN RICKABY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHRIS VANIER L 30/33 6 20 30.00 1 PHIL OVERHILL W 36/27 9 20 45.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS W 40/28 11 20 55.00 2 KELVIN PHOENIX 1 ELAINE MCMATH W 45/17 13 20 65.00 1 GAIL BISHOP W 38/27 10 20 50.00 2 DOUG FUNK 2 SUE BERTRAND 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE (Was 28%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 49 100 49.00 2??? CLIFF HUMBERSTONE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ELAINE MCMATH W 29/17 7 20 35.00 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 28/40 6 20 30.00 1 GAIL BISHOP W 27/26 6 20 30.00 2 DOUG FUNK 2 KELVIN PHOENIX 1 PHIL OVERHILL W 35/18 10 20 50.00 2 SUE BERTRAND 1 CHRIS VANIER L 20/21 4 20 20.00 2 BRIAN RICKABY (Was 19%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 33 100 33.00 2??? DOUG FUNK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 KELVIN PHOENIX 1 GAIL BISHOP L 15/22 2 20 10.00 1 CHRIS VANIER L 15/26 3 20 15.00 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 22/35 4 20 20.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH W 19/16 4 20 20.00 2 BRIAN RICKABY 1 PHIL OVERHILL Tie 21/21 4 20 20.00 2 SUE BERTRAND (Was 13%) TOTALS W 1« L 3« 17 100 17.00 2 SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 14/30 1 20 5.00 2 KELVIN PHOENIX 1 ELAINE MCMATH W 22/19 4 20 20.00 1 PHIL OVERHILL W 22/18 4 20 20.00 1 GAIL BISHOP L 20/25 2 20 10.00 1 CHRIS VANIER L 20/35 3 20 15.00 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE 2 BRIAN RICKABY 2 DOUG FUNK (Was 16%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 14 100 14.00 2 KELVIN PHOENIX - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DOUG FUNK 2 SUE BERTRAND 1 PHIL OVERHILL L 15/17 1 20 5.00 2 BRIAN RICKABY 2 CLIF HUMBERSTONE 1 SHELLEY EVANS L 12/32 1 20 5.00 1 CHRIS VANIER L 13/23 1 20 5.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH L 18/21 2 20 10.00 1 GAIL BISHOP L 15/28 1 20 5.00 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 6 100 6.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC ON-LINE TEAM - September 1, 2020 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC - CLASS B (20 Shoes) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 04:09 ON 09/02/20 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1???JAKE KONRAD BC 7502 4 1 119 21 100 21.00% 1 MARVIN FRIESEN BC 1953 5 0 128 21 100 21.00% 1 MIKE CARNEY BC 6021 4« « 124 21 100 21.00% 1 MARSHALL MERONIUK BC 1905 5 0 110 20 100 20.00% 1???GERALD WINTERS BC 1942 4 1 78 9 100 9.00% 2 LINDA ANDERSON BC 8156 1« 3« 109 16 100 16.00% 2 RON BOROSKI BC 8136 1 4 78 12 100 12.00% 2???BARB STASZKIEL BC 8152 0 5 76 12 100 12.00% 2???TAMMY POWELL BC 8151 0 5 76 8 100 8.00% 2???DAVE POWELL BC 8150 0 5 56 4 100 4.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1??? JAKE KONRAD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 RON BOROSKI L 14/17 1 20 5.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON W 30/22 6 20 30.00 2 TAMMY POWELL W 28/23 5 20 25.00 1 MIKE CARNEY 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 27/17 6 20 30.00 2 DAVE POWELL W 20/10 3 20 15.00 1 MARVIN FRIESEN 1 GERALD WINTERS 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK (Was 21%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 21 100 21.00 1 MARVIN FRIESEN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MIKE CARNEY 2 DAVE POWELL W 25/16 4 20 20.00 2 RON BOROSKI W 19/16 1 20 5.00 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK 2 TAMMY POWELL W 26/12 5 20 25.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 31/17 6 20 30.00 1 JAKE KONRAD 2 LINDA ANDERSON W 27/23 5 20 25.00 1 GERALD WINTERS (Was 12%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 21 100 21.00 1 MIKE CARNEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MARVIN FRIESEN 1 GERALD WINTERS 2 LINDA ANDERSON Tie 22/22 3 20 15.00 1 JAKE KONRAD 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK 2 TAMMY POWELL W 20/13 1 20 5.00 2 RON BOROSKI W 30/14 7 20 35.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 27/19 6 20 30.00 2 DAVE POWELL W 25/10 4 20 20.00 (Was 10%) TOTALS W 4« L 0« 21 100 21.00 1 MARSHALL MERONIUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 24/14 4 20 20.00 2 TAMMY POWELL W 23/17 5 20 25.00 2 DAVE POWELL W 18/9 3 20 15.00 1 MARVIN FRIESEN 1 MIKE CARNEY 2 LINDA ANDERSON W 22/20 3 20 15.00 1 GERALD WINTERS 2 RON BOROSKI W 23/13 5 20 25.00 1 JAKE KONRAD (Was 19%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 20 100 20.00 1??? GERALD WINTERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 TAMMY POWELL W 16/11 3 20 15.00 1 MIKE CARNEY 2 BARB STASZKIEL W 14/9 2 20 10.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON L 15/22 1 20 5.00 2 DAVE POWELL W 14/11 0 20 None 2 RON BOROSKI W 19/18 3 20 15.00 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK 1 JAKE KONRAD 1 MARVIN FRIESEN (Was 13%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 9 100 9.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DAVE POWELL 1 JAKE KONRAD L 22/30 3 20 15.00 1 MIKE CARNEY Tie 22/22 3 20 15.00 1 GERALD WINTERS W 22/15 3 20 15.00 2 RON BOROSKI 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK L 20/22 3 20 15.00 2 TAMMY POWELL 1 MARVIN FRIESEN L 23/27 4 20 20.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL (Was 4%) TOTALS W 1« L 3« 16 100 16.00 2 RON BOROSKI - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JAKE KONRAD W 17/14 3 20 15.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL 1 MARVIN FRIESEN L 16/19 3 20 15.00 2 DAVE POWELL 2 LINDA ANDERSON 1 GERALD WINTERS L 18/19 3 20 15.00 1 MIKE CARNEY L 14/30 1 20 5.00 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK L 13/23 2 20 10.00 2 TAMMY POWELL (Was 5%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 12 100 12.00 2??? BARB STASZKIEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK L 14/24 1 20 5.00 2 RON BOROSKI 1 GERALD WINTERS L 9/14 1 20 5.00 2 TAMMY POWELL 1 JAKE KONRAD L 17/27 2 20 10.00 1 MARVIN FRIESEN L 17/31 4 20 20.00 2 DAVE POWELL 1 MIKE CARNEY L 19/27 4 20 20.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON (Was 4%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 12 100 12.00 2??? TAMMY POWELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 GERALD WINTERS L 11/16 0 20 None 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK L 17/23 1 20 5.00 1 JAKE KONRAD L 23/28 5 20 25.00 2 BARB STASZKIEL 1 MARVIN FRIESEN L 12/26 1 20 5.00 1 MIKE CARNEY L 13/20 1 20 5.00 2 LINDA ANDERSON 2 DAVE POWELL 2 RON BOROSKI (Was 6%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 8 100 8.00 2??? DAVE POWELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LINDA ANDERSON 1 MARVIN FRIESEN L 16/25 2 20 10.00 1 MARSHAL MERONIUK L 9/18 0 20 None 2 RON BOROSKI 1 GERALD WINTERS L 11/14 2 20 10.00 1 JAKE KONRAD L 10/20 0 20 None 2 BARB STASZKIEL 2 TAMMY POWELL 1 MIKE CARNEY L 10/25 0 20 None (Was 7%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 4 100 4.00