THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC DAY MIXED OPEN - UNSANCTIONED - August 1, 2020 MIXED - CLASS A (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1TieBOB MCCAULEY BC 5358 4 1 226 72 100 72.00% 2* ALLAN CUMMINGS BC 1401 4 1 224 71 100 71.00% 3* JUANITA LAYE BC 1774 4 1 225 69 100 69.00% 4 BARRY DEVOCHT BC 8119 2 3 198 58 100 58.00% 5 TOM MOFFAT BC 4016 1 4 176 54 100 54.00% 6 CIRIL NOVAK BC 2241 0 5 178 55 100 55.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1Tie BOB MCCAULEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 TOM MOFFAT W 50/41 16 20 80.00 4 BARRY DEVOCHT W 46/35 15 20 75.00 6 CIRIL NOVAK W 46/36 15 20 75.00 3 JUANITA LAYE L 40/50 12 20 60.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 44/39 14 20 70.00 (Was 58%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 72 100 72.00 2* ALLAN CUMMINGS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JUANITA LAYE W 49/39 16 20 80.00 6 CIRIL NOVAK W 41/33 12 20 60.00 5 TOM MOFFAT W 45/32 15 20 75.00 4 BARRY DEVOCHT W 50/36 16 20 80.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 39/44 12 20 60.00 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 71 100 71.00 3* JUANITA LAYE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 39/49 11 20 55.00 5 TOM MOFFAT W 42/31 12 20 60.00 4 BARRY DEVOCHT W 45/37 14 20 70.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY W 50/40 16 20 80.00 6 CIRIL NOVAK W 49/44 16 20 80.00 (Was 58%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 69 100 69.00 4 BARRY DEVOCHT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 CIRIL NOVAK W 46/39 14 20 70.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 35/46 10 20 50.00 3 JUANITA LAYE L 37/45 10 20 50.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 36/50 11 20 55.00 5 TOM MOFFAT W 44/38 13 20 65.00 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 58 100 58.00 5 TOM MOFFAT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 41/50 13 20 65.00 3 JUANITA LAYE L 31/42 10 20 50.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 32/45 10 20 50.00 6 CIRIL NOVAK W 34/26 10 20 50.00 4 BARRY DEVOCHT L 38/44 11 20 55.00 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 54 100 54.00 6 CIRIL NOVAK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BARRY DEVOCHT L 39/46 12 20 60.00 2 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 33/41 10 20 50.00 1 BOB MCCAULEY L 36/46 11 20 55.00 5 TOM MOFFAT L 26/34 8 20 40.00 3 JUANITA LAYE L 44/49 14 20 70.00 (Was 60%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 55 100 55.00 MIXED - CLASS B (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 STEVE BISHOP BC 8115 5 0 206 57 100 57.00% 2= DON FLEMING BC 5327 3 2 159 41 100 41.00% 2= METOD NOVAK BC 2240 3 2 155 41 100 41.00% 4* LORENZO FERRARA BC 4218 3 2 158 37 100 37.00% 5 MARCIE NORQUAY BC 5211 1 4 159 44 100 44.00% 6 LANCE WHITWORTH BC 5381 0 5 120 31 100 31.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 STEVE BISHOP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 METOD NOVAK W 32/23 8 20 40.00 4 LORENZO FERRARA W 41/33 11 20 55.00 5 MARCIE NORQUAY W 44/31 12 20 60.00 2 DON FLEMING W 47/31 14 20 70.00 6 LANCE WHITWORTH W 42/27 12 20 60.00 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 57 100 57.00 2= DON FLEMING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 LANCE WHITWORTH W 26/17 7 20 35.00 5 MARCIE NORQUAY W 32/28 9 20 45.00 2 METOD NOVAK W 42/23 12 20 60.00 1 STEVE BISHOP L 31/47 7 20 35.00 4 LORENZO FERRARA L 28/30 6 20 30.00 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 41 100 41.00 2= METOD NOVAK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 STEVE BISHOP L 23/32 6 20 30.00 6 LANCE WHITWORTH W 35/29 9 20 45.00 2 DON FLEMING L 23/42 6 20 30.00 4 LORENZO FERRARA W 38/31 11 20 55.00 5 MARCIE NORQUAY W 36/32 9 20 45.00 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 41 100 41.00 4* LORENZO FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 MARCIE NORQUAY W 37/35 10 20 50.00 1 STEVE BISHOP L 33/41 8 20 40.00 6 LANCE WHITWORTH W 27/18 5 20 25.00 2 METOD NOVAK L 31/38 7 20 35.00 2 DON FLEMING W 30/28 7 20 35.00 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 37 100 37.00 5 MARCIE NORQUAY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 LORENZO FERRARA L 35/37 11 20 55.00 2 DON FLEMING L 28/32 7 20 35.00 1 STEVE BISHOP L 31/44 8 20 40.00 6 LANCE WHITWORTH W 33/29 9 20 45.00 2 METOD NOVAK L 32/36 9 20 45.00 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 44 100 44.00 6 LANCE WHITWORTH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DON FLEMING L 17/26 3 20 15.00 2 METOD NOVAK L 29/35 8 20 40.00 4 LORENZO FERRARA L 18/27 5 20 25.00 5 MARCIE NORQUAY L 29/33 8 20 40.00 1 STEVE BISHOP L 27/42 7 20 35.00 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 31 100 31.00 MIXED - CLASS C (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 JENNA JOHN BC 5105 5 0 181 52 100 52.00% 2* CHANTAL WILSON BC 8103 3 2 179 52 100 52.00% 3* PARRI KIRK BC 1596 3 2 158 38 100 38.00% 4 PHIL ERICKSON BC 0651 2 3 161 43 100 43.00% 5** ORLANDO PELLIZZARI BC 2108 1 4 138 35 100 35.00% 6** JIM WILLIAMS BC 5337 1 4 129 30 100 30.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 JENNA JOHN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CHANTAL WILSON W 35/31 10 20 50.00 6 JIM WILLIAMS W 38/25 12 20 60.00 5 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 33/29 10 20 50.00 3 PARRI KIRK W 41/34 11 20 55.00 4 PHIL ERICKSON W 34/33 9 20 45.00 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 52 100 52.00 2* CHANTAL WILSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JENNA JOHN L 31/35 8 20 40.00 4 PHIL ERICKSON W 37/29 11 20 55.00 6 JIM WILLIAMS L 33/35 9 20 45.00 5 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 38/33 12 20 60.00 3 PARRI KIRK W 40/26 12 20 60.00 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 52 100 52.00 3* PARRI KIRK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JIM WILLIAMS W 32/26 7 20 35.00 5 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 35/29 10 20 50.00 4 PHIL ERICKSON W 31/30 7 20 35.00 1 JENNA JOHN L 34/41 8 20 40.00 2 CHANTAL WILSON L 26/40 6 20 30.00 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 38 100 38.00 4 PHIL ERICKSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ORLAN PELLIZZARI W 30/17 8 20 40.00 2 CHANTAL WILSON L 29/37 7 20 35.00 3 PARRI KIRK L 30/31 7 20 35.00 6 JIM WILLIAMS W 39/18 12 20 60.00 1 JENNA JOHN L 33/34 9 20 45.00 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 43 100 43.00 5** ORLANDO PELLIZZARI - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 PHIL ERICKSON L 17/30 2 20 10.00 3 PARRI KIRK L 29/35 8 20 40.00 1 JENNA JOHN L 29/33 7 20 35.00 2 CHANTAL WILSON L 33/38 9 20 45.00 6 JIM WILLIAMS W 30/25 9 20 45.00 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 35 100 35.00 6** JIM WILLIAMS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 PARRI KIRK L 26/32 5 20 25.00 1 JENNA JOHN L 25/38 7 20 35.00 2 CHANTAL WILSON W 35/33 8 20 40.00 4 PHIL ERICKSON L 18/39 5 20 25.00 5 ORLAN PELLIZZARI L 25/30 5 20 25.00 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 30 100 30.00 MIXED - CLASS D (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1TieJOY DEVOCHT BC 8139 4 1 164 46 100 46.00% 2TieTOM HAMAKAWA BC 7505 4 1 148 39 100 39.00% 3 RON DUMONT BC 5081 3 2 154 30 100 30.00% 4 HENRY DYCK BC 8004 2« 2« 113 23 100 23.00% 5 VINCE HERKEL BC 3306 1 4 157 42 100 42.00% 6 JEAN PAUL BOURGOIN BC 2235 « 4« 96 17 100 17.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1Tie JOY DEVOCHT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JEAN PA BOURGOIN W 33/17 9 20 45.00 3 RON DUMONT W 34/29 9 20 45.00 4 HENRY DYCK W 22/16 6 20 30.00 5 VINCE HERKEL W 40/37 12 20 60.00 2 TOM HAMAKAWA L 35/38 10 20 50.00 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 46 100 46.00 2Tie TOM HAMAKAWA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 HENRY DYCK L 23/32 7 20 35.00 6 JEAN PA BOURGOIN W 27/23 5 20 25.00 5 VINCE HERKEL W 30/28 8 20 40.00 3 RON DUMONT W 30/28 8 20 40.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT W 38/35 11 20 55.00 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 39 100 39.00 3 RON DUMONT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 VINCE HERKEL W 32/24 6 20 30.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 29/34 5 20 25.00 6 JEAN PA BOURGOIN W 27/23 5 20 25.00 2 TOM HAMAKAWA L 28/30 5 20 25.00 4 HENRY DYCK W 38/21 9 20 45.00 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 30 100 30.00 4 HENRY DYCK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 TOM HAMAKAWA W 32/23 8 20 40.00 5 VINCE HERKEL W 28/24 6 20 30.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 16/22 4 20 20.00 6 JEAN PA BOURGOIN Tie 16/16 1 20 5.00 3 RON DUMONT L 21/38 4 20 20.00 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 23 100 23.00 5 VINCE HERKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 RON DUMONT L 24/32 7 20 35.00 4 HENRY DYCK L 24/28 6 20 30.00 2 TOM HAMAKAWA L 28/30 6 20 30.00 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 37/40 10 20 50.00 6 JEAN PA BOURGOIN W 44/17 13 20 65.00 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 42 100 42.00 6 JEAN PAUL BOURGOIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JOY DEVOCHT L 17/33 3 20 15.00 2 TOM HAMAKAWA L 23/27 4 20 20.00 3 RON DUMONT L 23/27 4 20 20.00 4 HENRY DYCK Tie 16/16 3 20 15.00 5 VINCE HERKEL L 17/44 3 20 15.00 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 0« L 4« 17 100 17.00 MIXED - CLASS E (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BRIAN RICKABY BC 0020 3« 1« 136 33 100 33.00% 2* DWAYNE BERTRAND BC 1619 3 2 125 29 100 29.00% 3* JUNE LAZENBY BC 6563 3 2 126 28 100 28.00% 4** SHELLEY EVANS BC 8128 2 3 140 27 100 27.00% 5** CHRIS VANIER BC 8133 2 3 121 22 100 22.00% 6 LUIK TANER BC 0041 1« 3« 117 24 100 24.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BRIAN RICKABY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 SHELLEY EVANS W 30/24 7 20 35.00 5 CHRIS VANIER W 33/31 8 20 40.00 3 JUNE LAZENBY L 24/25 5 20 25.00 2 DWAYNE BERTRAND Tie 22/22 6 20 30.00 6 LUIK TANER W 27/22 7 20 35.00 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 3« L 1« 33 100 33.00 2* DWAYNE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 LUIK TANER Tie 26/26 6 20 30.00 4 SHELLEY EVANS W 30/29 7 20 35.00 5 CHRIS VANIER L 21/22 4 20 20.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY Tie 22/22 5 20 25.00 3 JUNE LAZENBY W 26/21 7 20 35.00 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 29 100 29.00 3* JUNE LAZENBY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 CHRIS VANIER L 21/25 4 20 20.00 6 LUIK TANER W 23/21 5 20 25.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY W 25/24 4 20 20.00 4 SHELLEY EVANS W 36/31 10 20 50.00 2 DWAYNE BERTRAND L 21/26 5 20 25.00 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 28 100 28.00 4** SHELLEY EVANS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BRIAN RICKABY L 24/30 4 20 20.00 2 DWAYNE BERTRAND L 29/30 6 20 30.00 6 LUIK TANER W 27/24 5 20 25.00 3 JUNE LAZENBY L 31/36 6 20 30.00 5 CHRIS VANIER W 29/23 6 20 30.00 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 27 100 27.00 5** CHRIS VANIER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JUNE LAZENBY W 25/21 4 20 20.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY L 31/33 7 20 35.00 2 DWAYNE BERTRAND W 22/21 4 20 20.00 6 LUIK TANER L 20/24 3 20 15.00 4 SHELLEY EVANS L 23/29 4 20 20.00 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 22 100 22.00 6 LUIK TANER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DWAYNE BERTRAND Tie 26/26 6 20 30.00 3 JUNE LAZENBY L 21/23 3 20 15.00 4 SHELLEY EVANS L 24/27 6 20 30.00 5 CHRIS VANIER W 24/20 5 20 25.00 1 BRIAN RICKABY L 22/27 4 20 20.00 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 1« L 3« 24 100 24.00 MIXED - CLASS F (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 GAIL BISHOP BC 8114 4 1 133 21 100 21.00% 2 BILL BRUSSEE BC 1801 3 2 115 18 100 18.00% 3 CLIFF HUMBERSTONE BC 0015 2« 2« 113 20 100 20.00% 4* SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 2 3 101 18 100 18.00% 5* BRUCE KEHLER BC 0056 2 3 99 15 100 15.00% 6 BOB PRICE BC 2230 1« 3« 107 23 100 23.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 GAIL BISHOP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BRUCE KEHLER L 20/28 1 20 5.00 4 SUE BERTRAND W 32/18 6 20 30.00 6 BOB PRICE W 29/21 6 20 30.00 3 CLIF HUMBERSTONE W 25/19 4 20 20.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 27/25 4 20 20.00 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 21 100 21.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 19/25 2 20 10.00 6 BOB PRICE W 29/15 5 20 25.00 5 BRUCE KEHLER W 19/14 2 20 10.00 4 SUE BERTRAND W 23/22 4 20 20.00 1 GAIL BISHOP L 25/27 5 20 25.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 18 100 18.00 3 CLIFF HUMBERSTONE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BILL BRUSSEE W 25/19 5 20 25.00 5 BRUCE KEHLER L 20/22 3 20 15.00 4 SUE BERTRAND W 25/22 4 20 20.00 1 GAIL BISHOP L 19/25 3 20 15.00 6 BOB PRICE Tie 24/24 5 20 25.00 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 20 100 20.00 4* SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 BOB PRICE W 17/16 3 20 15.00 1 GAIL BISHOP L 18/32 2 20 10.00 3 CLIF HUMBERSTONE L 22/25 4 20 20.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE L 22/23 4 20 20.00 5 BRUCE KEHLER W 22/21 5 20 25.00 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 18 100 18.00 5* BRUCE KEHLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 GAIL BISHOP W 28/20 6 20 30.00 3 CLIF HUMBERSTONE W 22/20 3 20 15.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE L 14/19 1 20 5.00 6 BOB PRICE L 14/31 2 20 10.00 4 SUE BERTRAND L 21/22 3 20 15.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 15 100 15.00 6 BOB PRICE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 SUE BERTRAND L 16/17 4 20 20.00 2 BILL BRUSSEE L 15/29 3 20 15.00 1 GAIL BISHOP L 21/29 4 20 20.00 5 BRUCE KEHLER W 31/14 8 20 40.00 3 CLIF HUMBERSTONE Tie 24/24 4 20 20.00 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 1« L 3« 23 100 23.00 MIXED - CLASS G (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DOROTHY MILLER BC 5140 4« « 119 19 100 19.00% 2 BRUCE MILLER BC 2257 4 1 147 39 100 39.00% 3 BERNIE LEPPER BC 3696 3 2 109 21 100 21.00% 4 DOUG FUNK BC 0026 2« 2« 86 13 100 13.00% 5 BRIAN RYDER BC 0001 1 4 114 22 100 22.00% 6 A Pacer {Pacer} 9999 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DOROTHY MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 A Pacer W 24/0 4 20 20.00 4 DOUG FUNK Tie 19/19 2 20 10.00 5 BRIAN RYDER W 26/24 4 20 20.00 3 BERNIE LEPPER W 22/21 3 20 15.00 2 BRUCE MILLER W 28/20 6 20 30.00 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 4« L 0« 19 100 19.00 2 BRUCE MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DOUG FUNK W 29/15 8 20 40.00 3 BERNIE LEPPER W 33/19 9 20 45.00 6 A Pacer W 33/0 9 20 45.00 5 BRIAN RYDER W 32/21 8 20 40.00 1 DOROTHY MILLER L 20/28 5 20 25.00 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 39 100 39.00 3 BERNIE LEPPER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BRIAN RYDER W 25/22 5 20 25.00 2 BRUCE MILLER L 19/33 3 20 15.00 4 DOUG FUNK W 18/15 3 20 15.00 1 DOROTHY MILLER L 21/22 4 20 20.00 6 A Pacer W 26/0 6 20 30.00 (Was 14%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 21 100 21.00 4 DOUG FUNK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BRUCE MILLER L 15/29 2 20 10.00 1 DOROTHY MILLER Tie 19/19 3 20 15.00 3 BERNIE LEPPER L 15/18 2 20 10.00 6 A Pacer W 16/0 3 20 15.00 5 BRIAN RYDER W 21/20 3 20 15.00 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 13 100 13.00 5 BRIAN RYDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 BERNIE LEPPER L 22/25 6 20 30.00 6 A Pacer W 27/0 6 20 30.00 1 DOROTHY MILLER L 24/26 4 20 20.00 2 BRUCE MILLER L 21/32 3 20 15.00 4 DOUG FUNK L 20/21 3 20 15.00 (Was 14%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 22 100 22.00 MIXED - CLASS H (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SCOTT HALLS BC 1569 5 0 120 26 100 26.00% 2 MARYSE ATKINSON BC 0597 4 1 115 16 100 16.00% 3 PHIL OVERHILL BC 8144 3 2 98 8 100 8.00% 4 GREG ALTILIA BC 0060 2 3 70 3 100 3.00% 5 KELVIN PHOENIX BC 0028 1 4 78 11 100 11.00% 6 GORDON JULES BC 5104 0 5 75 5 100 5.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SCOTT HALLS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 GORDON JULES W 19/12 3 20 15.00 3 PHIL OVERHILL W 23/20 5 20 25.00 2 MARYSE ATKINSON W 31/21 8 20 40.00 4 GREG ALTILIA W 23/15 5 20 25.00 5 KELVIN PHOENIX W 24/17 5 20 25.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 26 100 26.00 2 MARYSE ATKINSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 GREG ALTILIA W 26/15 6 20 30.00 6 GORDON JULES W 26/25 4 20 20.00 1 SCOTT HALLS L 21/31 2 20 10.00 5 KELVIN PHOENIX W 21/18 2 20 10.00 3 PHIL OVERHILL W 21/15 2 20 10.00 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 16 100 16.00 3 PHIL OVERHILL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 KELVIN PHOENIX W 21/19 2 20 10.00 1 SCOTT HALLS L 20/23 2 20 10.00 4 GREG ALTILIA W 24/11 3 20 15.00 6 GORDON JULES W 18/14 1 20 5.00 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 15/21 0 20 None (Was 9%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 8 100 8.00 4 GREG ALTILIA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 15/26 0 20 None 5 KELVIN PHOENIX W 17/7 2 20 10.00 3 PHIL OVERHILL L 11/24 0 20 None 1 SCOTT HALLS L 15/23 1 20 5.00 6 GORDON JULES W 12/11 0 20 None (Was 10%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 3 100 3.00 5 KELVIN PHOENIX - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 PHIL OVERHILL L 19/21 3 20 15.00 4 GREG ALTILIA L 7/17 0 20 None 6 GORDON JULES W 17/13 2 20 10.00 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 18/21 4 20 20.00 1 SCOTT HALLS L 17/24 2 20 10.00 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 11 100 11.00 6 GORDON JULES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SCOTT HALLS L 12/19 0 20 None 2 MARYSE ATKINSON L 25/26 4 20 20.00 5 KELVIN PHOENIX L 13/17 0 20 None 3 PHIL OVERHILL L 14/18 1 20 5.00 4 GREG ALTILIA L 11/12 0 20 None (Was 6%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 5 100 5.00 MIXED - CLASS I (20 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1TieELAINE MCMATH BC 8148 4 1 104 12 100 12.00% 2TieTAMMY POWELL BC 8151 4 1 80 8 100 8.00% 3 DAVE POWELL BC 8150 3 2 66 9 100 9.00% 4 BETTY HART BC 5208 2« 2« 78 7 100 7.00% 5 BERNARD HAMEL BC 4504 1« 3« 56 2 100 2.00% 6 A Pacer {Pacer} 9999 0 5 0 0 100 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1Tie ELAINE MCMATH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BERNARD HAMEL W 22/6 2 20 10.00 2 TAMMY POWELL L 18/20 2 20 10.00 6 A Pacer W 21/0 2 20 10.00 3 DAVE POWELL W 23/16 3 20 15.00 4 BETTY HART W 20/19 3 20 15.00 (Was 5%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 12 100 12.00 2Tie TAMMY POWELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DAVE POWELL L 12/17 1 20 5.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH W 20/18 2 20 10.00 5 BERNARD HAMEL W 15/13 2 20 10.00 4 BETTY HART W 20/15 3 20 15.00 6 A Pacer W 13/0 0 20 None (Was 5%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 8 100 8.00 3 DAVE POWELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 TAMMY POWELL W 17/12 4 20 20.00 6 A Pacer W 10/0 1 20 5.00 4 BETTY HART L 10/19 0 20 None 1 ELAINE MCMATH L 16/23 2 20 10.00 5 BERNARD HAMEL W 13/10 2 20 10.00 (Was 5%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 9 100 9.00 4 BETTY HART - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 A Pacer W 10/0 0 20 None 5 BERNARD HAMEL Tie 15/15 1 20 5.00 3 DAVE POWELL W 19/10 3 20 15.00 2 TAMMY POWELL L 15/20 1 20 5.00 1 ELAINE MCMATH L 19/20 2 20 10.00 (Was 5%) TOTALS W 2« L 2« 7 100 7.00 5 BERNARD HAMEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ELAINE MCMATH L 6/22 0 20 None 4 BETTY HART Tie 15/15 2 20 10.00 2 TAMMY POWELL L 13/15 0 20 None 6 A Pacer W 12/0 0 20 None 3 DAVE POWELL L 10/13 0 20 None (Was 3%) TOTALS W 1« L 3« 2 100 2.00