THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - QUESNEL - September 2, 2006 JUNIORS - CLASS A (25 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 MATHEW MACDONALD BC 7775 8 1 231 79 232 34.05% 2 SAM DEGRAAF BC 1467 7 2 209 76 246 30.89% 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF BC 1468 3 6 131 37 258 14.34% 4 MIKIE ROY BC 1241 0 9 24 4 240 1.66% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 MATHEW MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 26/18 9 38 23.68 4 MIKIE ROY W 26/1 6 24 25.00 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 16/25 9 30 30.00 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 25/1 8 14 57.14 4 MIKIE ROY W 28/4 7 28 25.00 2 SAM DEGRAAF W 28/19 12 30 40.00 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 26/2 10 22 45.45 4 MIKIE ROY W 30/4 7 26 26.92 2 SAM DEGRAAF W 26/6 11 20 55.00 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 8 L 1 79 232 34.05 2 SAM DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 MIKIE ROY W 26/3 6 28 21.42 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 26/12 10 36 27.77 1 MATHEW MACDONALD W 25/16 12 30 40.00 4 MIKIE ROY W 28/0 7 22 31.81 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 25/15 6 40 15.00 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 19/28 11 30 36.66 4 MIKIE ROY W 27/0 7 22 31.81 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 27/3 11 18 61.11 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 6/26 6 20 30.00 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 76 246 30.89 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 18/26 4 38 10.52 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 12/26 5 36 13.88 4 MIKIE ROY W 25/3 3 32 9.37 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 1/25 0 14 None 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 15/25 5 40 12.50 4 MIKIE ROY W 26/7 6 36 16.66 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 2/26 3 22 13.63 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 3/27 2 18 11.11 4 MIKIE ROY W 29/2 9 22 40.90 (Was 15%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 37 258 14.34 4 MIKIE ROY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 3/26 0 28 None 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 1/26 0 24 None 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF L 3/25 1 32 3.12 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 0/28 0 22 None 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 4/28 0 28 None 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF L 7/26 0 36 None 2 SAM DEGRAAF L 0/27 1 22 4.54 1 MATHEW MACDONALD L 4/30 1 26 3.84 3 JESSICA DEGRAAF L 2/29 1 22 4.54 (Was 2%) TOTALS W 0 L 9 4 240 1.66 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# NEIL YASKOW BC 3136 8 3 420 327 524 62.40% 2 WILF GREGORY BC 3293 7 4 371 348 598 58.19% 3* MURRAY RAYNER BC 4856 6 4 383 319 492 64.83% 4* WALTER KINAKIN BC 0744 6 4 362 317 518 61.19% 5** LEO ANDERSON BC 2930 2 8 264 257 504 50.99% 6** JOHN THORNTON BC 0678 2 8 190 178 388 45.87% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# NEIL YASKOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOHN THORNTON L 21/41 18 44 40.90 5 LEO ANDERSON W 41/32 26 48 54.16 4 WALTER KINAKIN W 45/22 36 48 75.00 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 28/40 31 56 55.35 2 WILF GREGORY W 41/14 35 50 70.00 6 JOHN THORNTON W 42/4 18 22 81.81 5 LEO ANDERSON W 42/11 30 44 68.18 4 WALTER KINAKIN W 40/38 39 58 67.24 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/31 39 58 67.24 2 WILF GREGORY L 36/40 25 48 52.08 2 WILF GREGORY W 43/11 30 48 62.50 (Was 62%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 327 524 62.40 2 WILF GREGORY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/36 41 60 68.33 4 WALTER KINAKIN L 21/42 32 56 57.14 6 JOHN THORNTON L 34/41 41 68 60.29 5 LEO ANDERSON W 41/30 34 60 56.66 1 NEIL YASKOW L 14/41 26 50 52.00 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/38 35 60 58.33 4 WALTER KINAKIN W 42/37 38 60 63.33 6 JOHN THORNTON W 44/19 23 34 67.64 5 LEO ANDERSON W 43/24 32 54 59.25 1 NEIL YASKOW W 40/36 27 48 56.25 1 NEIL YASKOW L 11/43 19 48 39.58 (Was 64%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 348 598 58.19 3* MURRAY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 WILF GREGORY L 36/40 41 60 68.33 6 JOHN THORNTON W 41/8 24 32 75.00 5 LEO ANDERSON W 40/22 30 48 62.50 1 NEIL YASKOW W 40/28 37 56 66.07 4 WALTER KINAKIN L 31/41 28 58 48.27 2 WILF GREGORY L 38/41 36 60 60.00 6 JOHN THORNTON W 41/3 24 28 85.71 5 LEO ANDERSON W 40/15 31 46 67.39 1 NEIL YASKOW L 31/41 37 58 63.79 4 WALTER KINAKIN W 45/19 31 46 67.39 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 64%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 319 492 64.83 4* WALTER KINAKIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LEO ANDERSON W 40/18 45 62 72.58 2 WILF GREGORY W 42/21 38 56 67.85 1 NEIL YASKOW L 22/45 28 48 58.33 6 JOHN THORNTON W 41/9 20 28 71.42 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/31 30 58 51.72 5 LEO ANDERSON W 41/30 30 56 53.57 2 WILF GREGORY L 37/42 37 60 61.66 1 NEIL YASKOW L 38/40 39 58 67.24 6 JOHN THORNTON W 41/24 27 46 58.69 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 19/45 23 46 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 61%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 317 518 61.19 5** LEO ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 WALTER KINAKIN L 18/40 38 62 61.29 1 NEIL YASKOW L 32/41 22 48 45.83 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 22/40 23 48 47.91 2 WILF GREGORY L 30/41 31 60 51.66 6 JOHN THORNTON W 42/33 28 58 48.27 4 WALTER KINAKIN L 30/41 26 56 46.42 1 NEIL YASKOW L 11/42 20 44 45.45 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 15/40 23 46 50.00 2 WILF GREGORY L 24/43 28 54 51.85 6 JOHN THORNTON W 40/8 18 28 64.28 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 55%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 257 504 50.99 6** JOHN THORNTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 NEIL YASKOW W 41/21 24 44 54.54 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 8/41 13 32 40.62 2 WILF GREGORY W 41/34 43 68 63.23 4 WALTER KINAKIN L 9/41 10 28 35.71 5 LEO ANDERSON L 33/42 27 58 46.55 1 NEIL YASKOW L 4/42 5 22 22.72 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 3/41 12 28 42.85 2 WILF GREGORY L 19/44 15 34 44.11 4 WALTER KINAKIN L 24/41 22 46 47.82 5 LEO ANDERSON L 8/40 7 28 25.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 54%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 178 388 45.87 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY BC 1502 7 3 361 228 468 48.71% 2* GORDON SNYDER BC 2952 6 4 386 234 506 46.24% 3* ERLE SALMON BC 3621 6 4 344 203 480 42.29% 4* WAYNE HODGINS BC 4097 6 4 364 204 490 41.63% 5 JERRY HARACH BC 1751 5 5 333 215 518 41.50% 6 EARLE GILLARD BC 4212 0 10 153 80 398 20.10% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 EARLE GILLARD W 40/15 17 34 50.00 4 WAYNE HODGINS L 15/42 16 44 36.36 2 GORDON SNYDER L 38/42 24 58 41.37 3 ERLE SALMON L 19/42 18 48 37.50 5 JERRY HARACH W 45/27 30 58 51.72 6 EARLE GILLARD W 42/11 15 30 50.00 4 WAYNE HODGINS W 40/28 25 52 48.07 2 GORDON SNYDER W 41/36 30 58 51.72 3 ERLE SALMON W 40/35 30 40 75.00 5 JERRY HARACH W 41/16 23 46 50.00 (Was 49%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 228 468 48.71 2* GORDON SNYDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ERLE SALMON L 39/42 29 68 42.64 6 EARLE GILLARD W 40/25 23 50 46.00 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/38 27 58 46.55 5 JERRY HARACH L 30/40 17 50 34.00 4 WAYNE HODGINS W 43/32 26 54 48.14 3 ERLE SALMON W 43/6 19 30 63.33 6 EARLE GILLARD W 41/7 16 36 44.44 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 36/41 28 58 48.27 5 JERRY HARACH W 44/21 23 44 52.27 4 WAYNE HODGINS L 28/42 26 58 44.82 (Was 52%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 234 506 46.24 3* ERLE SALMON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 GORDON SNYDER W 42/39 27 68 39.70 5 JERRY HARACH L 27/40 20 56 35.71 4 WAYNE HODGINS L 28/41 13 46 28.26 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/19 26 48 54.16 6 EARLE GILLARD W 42/22 21 58 36.20 2 GORDON SNYDER L 6/43 8 30 26.66 5 JERRY HARACH W 40/35 26 58 44.82 4 WAYNE HODGINS W 40/12 17 34 50.00 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 35/40 28 40 70.00 6 EARLE GILLARD W 42/26 17 42 40.47 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 203 480 42.29 4* WAYNE HODGINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JERRY HARACH W 45/30 23 56 41.07 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/15 23 44 52.27 3 ERLE SALMON W 41/28 18 46 39.13 6 EARLE GILLARD W 44/17 15 42 35.71 2 GORDON SNYDER L 32/43 22 54 40.74 5 JERRY HARACH L 38/42 33 74 44.59 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 28/40 20 52 38.46 3 ERLE SALMON L 12/40 6 34 17.64 6 EARLE GILLARD W 40/9 14 30 46.66 2 GORDON SNYDER W 42/28 30 58 51.72 (Was 52%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 204 490 41.63 5 JERRY HARACH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 WAYNE HODGINS L 30/45 19 56 33.92 3 ERLE SALMON W 40/27 23 56 41.07 6 EARLE GILLARD W 41/10 20 40 50.00 2 GORDON SNYDER W 40/30 21 50 42.00 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 27/45 25 58 43.10 4 WAYNE HODGINS W 42/38 34 74 45.94 3 ERLE SALMON L 35/40 22 58 37.93 6 EARLE GILLARD W 41/11 15 36 41.66 2 GORDON SNYDER L 21/44 18 44 40.90 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 16/41 18 46 39.13 (Was 49%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 215 518 41.50 6 EARLE GILLARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 15/40 9 34 26.47 2 GORDON SNYDER L 25/40 16 50 32.00 5 JERRY HARACH L 10/41 7 40 17.50 4 WAYNE HODGINS L 17/44 8 42 19.04 3 ERLE SALMON L 22/42 13 58 22.41 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 11/42 6 30 20.00 2 GORDON SNYDER L 7/41 4 36 11.11 5 JERRY HARACH L 11/41 4 36 11.11 4 WAYNE HODGINS L 9/40 4 30 13.33 3 ERLE SALMON L 26/42 9 42 21.42 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 80 398 20.10 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TED PETERS BC 4811 9 1 355 181 456 39.69% 2 JOE BELANGER BC 1752 7 3 331 152 422 36.01% 3 NORM LEBRUN BC 2815 5 5 290 144 440 32.72% 4* KEN MOUNT BC 1145 4 6 278 137 466 29.39% 5* MIKE CAMERON BC 0531 4 6 239 114 448 25.44% 6 TED KUPFERSHMID BC 0507 1 9 209 86 444 19.36% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TED PETERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JOE BELANGER W 39/25 21 52 40.38 4 KEN MOUNT W 35/14 18 38 47.36 3 NORM LEBRUN W 36/26 22 50 44.00 5 MIKE CAMERON W 37/17 16 46 34.78 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 36/25 14 38 36.84 2 JOE BELANGER W 35/33 24 58 41.37 4 KEN MOUNT W 35/5 15 32 46.87 3 NORM LEBRUN W 37/20 15 36 41.66 5 MIKE CAMERON L 28/38 20 56 35.71 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/20 16 50 32.00 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 181 456 39.69 2 JOE BELANGER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TED PETERS L 25/39 16 52 30.76 3 NORM LEBRUN W 35/21 12 36 33.33 5 MIKE CAMERON W 37/8 12 30 40.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/1 11 26 42.30 4 KEN MOUNT W 37/30 18 56 32.14 1 TED PETERS L 33/35 25 58 43.10 3 NORM LEBRUN L 18/35 9 36 25.00 5 MIKE CAMERON W 35/26 19 46 41.30 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/16 12 30 40.00 4 KEN MOUNT W 37/27 18 52 34.61 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 152 422 36.01 3 NORM LEBRUN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 27/35 11 42 26.19 2 JOE BELANGER L 21/35 11 36 30.55 1 TED PETERS L 26/36 20 50 40.00 4 KEN MOUNT L 17/35 11 48 22.91 5 MIKE CAMERON W 36/18 18 52 34.61 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/32 16 56 28.57 2 JOE BELANGER W 35/18 15 36 41.66 1 TED PETERS L 20/37 11 36 30.55 4 KEN MOUNT W 36/25 17 56 30.35 5 MIKE CAMERON W 35/6 14 28 50.00 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 144 440 32.72 4* KEN MOUNT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 MIKE CAMERON W 36/16 14 36 38.88 1 TED PETERS L 14/35 12 38 31.57 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/19 15 48 31.25 3 NORM LEBRUN W 35/17 16 48 33.33 2 JOE BELANGER L 30/37 17 56 30.35 5 MIKE CAMERON L 34/36 12 50 24.00 1 TED PETERS L 5/35 8 32 25.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/13 15 50 30.00 3 NORM LEBRUN L 25/36 14 56 25.00 2 JOE BELANGER L 27/37 14 52 26.92 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 137 466 29.39 5* MIKE CAMERON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 KEN MOUNT L 16/36 8 36 22.22 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 39/23 17 52 32.69 2 JOE BELANGER L 8/37 4 30 13.33 1 TED PETERS L 17/37 10 46 21.73 3 NORM LEBRUN L 18/36 8 52 15.38 4 KEN MOUNT W 36/34 13 50 26.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/25 12 52 23.07 2 JOE BELANGER L 26/35 14 46 30.43 1 TED PETERS W 38/28 23 56 41.07 3 NORM LEBRUN L 6/35 5 28 17.85 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 114 448 25.44 6 TED KUPFERSHMID - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 NORM LEBRUN W 35/27 10 42 23.80 5 MIKE CAMERON L 23/39 10 52 19.23 4 KEN MOUNT L 19/37 8 48 16.66 2 JOE BELANGER L 1/37 0 26 None 1 TED PETERS L 25/36 9 38 23.68 3 NORM LEBRUN L 32/37 12 56 21.42 5 MIKE CAMERON L 25/35 11 52 21.15 4 KEN MOUNT L 13/35 10 50 20.00 2 JOE BELANGER L 16/37 5 30 16.66 1 TED PETERS L 20/37 11 50 22.00 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 86 444 19.36 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS D (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS BC 0221 7 2 293 104 422 24.64% 2 ROGER HELGESON BC 1812 6 3 306 104 420 24.76% 3 STEW BATTIE BC 2886 5 4 239 81 372 21.77% 4 MARCEL PINETTE BC 4210 0 9 144 52 366 14.20% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 STEW BATTIE W 35/21 13 42 30.95 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 35/15 12 42 28.57 2 ROGER HELGESON W 35/30 14 64 21.87 3 STEW BATTIE L 13/36 3 40 7.50 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 37/24 11 48 22.91 2 ROGER HELGESON W 36/29 16 54 29.62 3 STEW BATTIE W 35/15 10 42 23.80 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 37/15 13 38 34.21 2 ROGER HELGESON L 30/35 12 52 23.07 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 104 422 24.64 2 ROGER HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 35/26 11 44 25.00 3 STEW BATTIE L 29/38 8 56 14.28 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS L 30/35 13 64 20.31 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 37/10 13 40 32.50 3 STEW BATTIE W 38/6 12 30 40.00 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS L 29/36 13 54 24.07 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 38/8 10 36 27.77 3 STEW BATTIE W 35/13 9 44 20.45 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS W 35/30 15 52 28.84 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 104 420 24.76 3 STEW BATTIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS L 21/35 10 42 23.80 2 ROGER HELGESON W 38/29 14 56 25.00 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 35/17 10 36 27.77 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS W 36/13 12 40 30.00 2 ROGER HELGESON L 6/38 3 30 10.00 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 40/23 12 52 23.07 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS L 15/35 5 42 11.90 2 ROGER HELGESON L 13/35 4 44 9.09 4 MARCEL PINETTE W 35/6 11 30 36.66 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 81 372 21.77 4 MARCEL PINETTE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ROGER HELGESON L 26/35 9 44 20.45 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS L 15/35 7 42 16.66 3 STEW BATTIE L 17/35 5 36 13.88 2 ROGER HELGESON L 10/37 6 40 15.00 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS L 24/37 6 48 12.50 3 STEW BATTIE L 23/40 7 52 13.46 2 ROGER HELGESON L 8/38 4 36 11.11 1 ARCHIE RADOWITS L 15/37 6 38 15.78 3 STEW BATTIE L 6/35 2 30 6.66 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 0 L 9 52 366 14.20 WOMEN - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DOREEN MULOIN BC 9781 10 0 419 241 398 60.55% 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE BC 0306 8 2 372 231 444 52.02% 3* IDA BOSCHMAN BC 2923 4 6 291 204 450 45.33% 4* DOROTHY KRIMMER BC 3902 4 6 306 222 490 45.30% 5** JUNE THOMPSON BC 3884 2 8 301 206 470 43.82% 6** VIVIAN FENDLE BC 0558 2 8 216 180 444 40.54% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DOREEN MULOIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/0 20 24 83.33 6 VIVIAN FENDLE W 45/6 20 30 66.66 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 40/32 26 54 48.14 5 JUNE THOMPSON W 40/15 23 38 60.52 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 42/1 20 26 76.92 3 IDA BOSCHMAN W 43/20 22 44 50.00 6 VIVIAN FENDLE W 42/10 22 36 61.11 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 42/22 25 42 59.52 5 JUNE THOMPSON W 41/18 24 38 63.15 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 44/37 39 66 59.09 (Was 60%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 241 398 60.55 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 41/10 21 34 61.76 5 JUNE THOMPSON W 41/30 20 50 40.00 6 VIVIAN FENDLE W 40/23 24 46 52.17 3 IDA BOSCHMAN W 43/12 14 28 50.00 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 1/42 7 26 26.92 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 41/13 24 38 63.15 5 JUNE THOMPSON W 42/37 31 56 55.35 6 VIVIAN FENDLE W 42/9 24 40 60.00 3 IDA BOSCHMAN W 44/39 28 60 46.66 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 37/44 38 66 57.57 (Was 62%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 231 444 52.02 3* IDA BOSCHMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 0/40 7 24 29.16 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 43/31 22 50 44.00 5 JUNE THOMPSON L 12/40 13 32 40.62 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 12/43 5 28 17.85 6 VIVIAN FENDLE W 43/32 32 64 50.00 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 20/43 17 44 38.63 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 39/40 35 70 50.00 5 JUNE THOMPSON W 41/30 23 46 50.00 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 39/44 27 60 45.00 6 VIVIAN FENDLE W 42/6 23 32 71.87 (Was 56%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 204 450 45.33 4* DOROTHY KRIMMER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 10/41 11 34 32.35 3 IDA BOSCHMAN L 31/43 18 50 36.00 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 32/40 25 54 46.29 6 VIVIAN FENDLE W 41/11 22 42 52.38 5 JUNE THOMPSON L 35/45 24 58 41.37 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 13/41 14 38 36.84 3 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/39 35 70 50.00 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 22/42 19 42 45.23 6 VIVIAN FENDLE W 42/35 25 52 48.07 5 JUNE THOMPSON W 40/33 29 50 58.00 (Was 48%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 222 490 45.30 5** JUNE THOMPSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 VIVIAN FENDLE L 16/43 10 40 25.00 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 30/41 18 50 36.00 3 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/12 21 32 65.62 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 15/40 15 38 39.47 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 45/35 25 58 43.10 6 VIVIAN FENDLE L 37/41 27 62 43.54 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 37/42 29 56 51.78 3 IDA BOSCHMAN L 30/41 19 46 41.30 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 18/41 16 38 42.10 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 33/40 26 50 52.00 (Was 50%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 206 470 43.82 6** VIVIAN FENDLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JUNE THOMPSON W 43/16 18 40 45.00 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 6/45 8 30 26.66 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 23/40 21 46 45.65 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 11/41 14 42 33.33 3 IDA BOSCHMAN L 32/43 29 64 45.31 5 JUNE THOMPSON W 41/37 28 62 45.16 1 DOREEN MULOIN L 10/42 12 36 33.33 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 9/42 15 40 37.50 4 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 35/42 23 52 44.23 3 IDA BOSCHMAN L 6/42 12 32 37.50 (Was 51%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 180 444 40.54 WOMEN - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 NORMA BISCHOFF BC 1105 11 1 490 253 554 45.66% 2* RUBY MILLER BC 4853 7 5 432 249 564 44.14% 3* VERNA WEINGARDT BC 9778 7 5 430 243 582 41.75% 4** BONNIE HERRETT BC 0242 6 6 413 259 602 43.02% 5** YVONNE GREAVES BC 9767 6 6 382 204 582 35.05% 6 LORRAINE HAMEL BC 0697 3 9 256 168 530 31.69% 7 CINDY HELGESON BC 3969 2 10 294 168 526 31.93% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 NORMA BISCHOFF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 YVONNE GREAVES W 41/9 13 40 32.50 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 40/12 25 46 54.34 7 CINDY HELGESON W 40/13 13 36 36.11 3 VERNA WEINGARDT W 41/16 24 42 57.14 2 RUBY MILLER W 42/24 22 50 44.00 4 BONNIE HERRETT W 43/38 29 62 46.77 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 YVONNE GREAVES W 43/19 21 48 43.75 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 40/5 15 28 53.57 7 CINDY HELGESON W 41/32 20 50 40.00 3 VERNA WEINGARDT W 45/36 28 58 48.27 2 RUBY MILLER L 31/43 20 44 45.45 4 BONNIE HERRETT W 43/26 23 50 46.00 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 11 L 1 253 554 45.66 2* RUBY MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BONNIE HERRETT W 41/18 25 50 50.00 7 CINDY HELGESON W 43/19 18 36 50.00 5 YVONNE GREAVES W 41/27 23 50 46.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 41/24 22 42 52.38 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 24/42 16 50 32.00 3 VERNA WEINGARDT L 19/40 19 44 43.18 4 BONNIE HERRETT L 26/42 19 48 39.58 7 CINDY HELGESON W 40/4 20 34 58.82 5 YVONNE GREAVES L 38/45 20 54 37.03 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 LORRAINE HAMEL L 36/44 17 52 32.69 1 NORMA BISCHOFF W 43/31 24 44 54.54 3 VERNA WEINGARDT W 40/29 26 60 43.33 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 249 564 44.14 3* VERNA WEINGARDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 40/17 22 48 45.83 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 CINDY HELGESON W 40/4 16 32 50.00 4 BONNIE HERRETT L 21/40 15 46 32.60 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 16/41 16 42 38.09 5 YVONNE GREAVES L 39/42 30 74 40.54 2 RUBY MILLER W 40/19 26 44 59.09 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 43/15 17 44 38.63 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 CINDY HELGESON W 43/31 16 50 32.00 4 BONNIE HERRETT W 41/26 22 44 50.00 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 36/45 25 58 43.10 5 YVONNE GREAVES W 42/25 15 40 37.50 2 RUBY MILLER L 29/40 23 60 38.33 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 243 582 41.75 4** BONNIE HERRETT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 RUBY MILLER L 18/41 20 50 40.00 6 LORRAINE HAMEL L 28/42 23 54 42.59 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 VERNA WEINGARDT W 40/21 22 46 47.82 5 YVONNE GREAVES W 40/21 18 46 39.13 7 CINDY HELGESON L 31/43 20 54 37.03 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 38/43 28 62 45.16 2 RUBY MILLER W 42/26 25 48 52.08 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 42/23 24 54 44.44 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 VERNA WEINGARDT L 26/41 18 44 40.90 5 YVONNE GREAVES W 42/31 18 44 40.90 7 CINDY HELGESON W 40/12 25 50 50.00 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 26/43 18 50 36.00 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 259 602 43.02 5** YVONNE GREAVES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 CINDY HELGESON W 40/36 18 58 31.03 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 9/41 5 40 12.50 2 RUBY MILLER L 27/41 19 50 38.00 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 41/8 15 28 53.57 4 BONNIE HERRETT L 21/40 15 46 32.60 3 VERNA WEINGARDT W 42/39 33 74 44.59 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 CINDY HELGESON W 42/22 20 46 43.47 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 19/43 13 48 27.08 2 RUBY MILLER W 45/38 22 54 40.74 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 40/21 19 54 35.18 4 BONNIE HERRETT L 31/42 16 44 36.36 3 VERNA WEINGARDT L 25/42 9 40 22.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 40%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 204 582 35.05 6 LORRAINE HAMEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 VERNA WEINGARDT L 17/40 16 48 33.33 4 BONNIE HERRETT W 42/28 27 54 50.00 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 12/40 15 46 32.60 5 YVONNE GREAVES L 8/41 4 28 14.28 2 RUBY MILLER L 24/41 16 42 38.09 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 CINDY HELGESON W 42/37 18 50 36.00 3 VERNA WEINGARDT L 15/43 10 44 22.72 4 BONNIE HERRETT L 23/42 18 54 33.33 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 5/40 4 28 14.28 5 YVONNE GREAVES L 21/40 14 54 25.92 2 RUBY MILLER W 44/36 22 52 42.30 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 CINDY HELGESON L 3/41 4 30 13.33 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 9 168 530 31.69 7 CINDY HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 YVONNE GREAVES L 36/40 18 58 31.03 2 RUBY MILLER L 19/43 11 36 30.55 3 VERNA WEINGARDT L 4/40 6 32 18.75 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 13/40 6 36 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 BONNIE HERRETT W 43/31 23 54 42.59 6 LORRAINE HAMEL L 37/42 16 50 32.00 5 YVONNE GREAVES L 22/42 14 46 30.43 2 RUBY MILLER L 4/40 9 34 26.47 3 VERNA WEINGARDT L 31/43 15 50 30.00 1 NORMA BISCHOFF L 32/41 20 50 40.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 BONNIE HERRETT L 12/40 15 50 30.00 6 LORRAINE HAMEL W 41/3 15 30 50.00 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 2 L 10 168 526 31.93 WOMEN - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF BC 0062 10 2 415 221 478 46.23% 2 JEANETTE FERRARA BC 4214 9 3 346 181 506 35.77% 3* LORRAINE HUBICK BC 0881 7 5 351 187 544 34.37% 4* SHELLY KOPP BC 0207 7 5 341 179 528 33.90% 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK BC 3376 6 6 356 192 554 34.65% 6 JOYCE HAMEL BC 0505 2 10 293 158 566 27.91% 7 SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 1 11 254 130 528 24.62% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 28/35 17 50 34.00 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 37/26 27 52 51.92 4 SHELLY KOPP W 35/18 19 38 50.00 7 SUE BERTRAND W 36/21 21 46 45.65 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 35/16 18 38 47.36 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 40/18 19 40 47.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 JEANETTE FERRARA W 37/6 15 26 57.69 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 36/23 17 40 42.50 4 SHELLY KOPP W 35/11 19 40 47.50 7 SUE BERTRAND W 35/12 13 30 43.33 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK L 23/35 22 50 44.00 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 38/11 14 28 50.00 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 10 L 2 221 478 46.23 2 JEANETTE FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 SHELLY KOPP W 37/23 23 54 42.59 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 35/28 19 50 38.00 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 37/30 21 52 40.38 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 38/18 16 34 47.05 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 4/35 4 26 15.38 7 SUE BERTRAND W 35/16 16 30 53.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 SHELLY KOPP L 10/36 8 40 20.00 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 6/37 5 26 19.23 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 37/21 21 44 47.72 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 36/25 15 52 28.84 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 35/19 22 60 36.66 7 SUE BERTRAND W 36/16 11 38 28.94 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 9 L 3 181 506 35.77 3* LORRAINE HUBICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK L 21/35 19 58 32.75 6 JOYCE HAMEL L 33/35 16 56 28.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 SUE BERTRAND W 35/19 19 50 38.00 2 JEANETTE FERRARA W 35/4 14 26 53.84 4 SHELLY KOPP W 37/21 16 34 47.05 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 18/40 12 40 30.00 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 35/21 16 46 34.78 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 37/34 19 56 33.92 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 SUE BERTRAND W 35/27 18 54 33.33 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 19/35 19 60 31.66 4 SHELLY KOPP W 35/15 15 36 41.66 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 11/38 4 28 14.28 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 187 544 34.37 4* SHELLY KOPP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 23/37 15 54 27.77 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 36/21 20 44 45.45 7 SUE BERTRAND W 36/15 14 42 33.33 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 18/35 13 38 34.21 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 21/37 10 34 29.41 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 38/9 20 46 43.47 2 JEANETTE FERRARA W 36/10 15 40 37.50 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK W 36/33 20 56 35.71 7 SUE BERTRAND W 36/33 18 58 31.03 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 11/35 12 40 30.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 15/35 10 36 27.77 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 35/17 12 40 30.00 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 179 528 33.90 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 35/21 22 58 37.93 4 SHELLY KOPP L 21/36 16 44 36.36 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 30/37 16 52 30.76 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 35/20 15 34 44.11 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 16/35 12 38 31.57 7 SUE BERTRAND W 35/24 15 42 35.71 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 21/35 12 46 26.08 4 SHELLY KOPP L 33/36 19 56 33.92 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 21/37 15 44 34.09 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 36/26 15 54 27.77 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 35/23 24 50 48.00 7 SUE BERTRAND W 38/9 11 36 30.55 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 192 554 34.65 6 JOYCE HAMEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 SUE BERTRAND L 20/35 7 48 14.58 3 LORRAINE HUBICK W 35/33 17 56 30.35 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 26/37 22 52 42.30 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 18/38 10 34 29.41 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK L 20/35 11 34 32.35 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 SHELLY KOPP L 9/38 11 46 23.91 7 SUE BERTRAND W 40/27 19 54 35.18 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 34/37 21 56 37.50 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 23/36 11 40 27.50 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 25/36 10 52 19.23 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK L 26/36 12 54 22.22 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 SHELLY KOPP L 17/35 7 40 17.50 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 2 L 10 158 566 27.91 7 SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOYCE HAMEL W 35/20 10 48 20.83 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 SHELLY KOPP L 15/36 7 42 16.66 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 19/35 13 50 26.00 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 21/36 15 46 32.60 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 16/35 9 30 30.00 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK L 24/35 10 42 23.80 6 JOYCE HAMEL L 27/40 14 54 25.92 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 SHELLY KOPP L 33/36 17 58 29.31 3 LORRAINE HUBICK L 27/35 15 54 27.77 1 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 12/35 7 30 23.33 2 JEANETTE FERRARA L 16/36 7 38 18.42 5 BETTY BLACKLOCK L 9/38 6 36 16.66 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 1 L 11 130 528 24.62 WOMEN - CLASS D (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SUSAN MACDONALD BC 4084 7 1 256 102 278 36.69% 2 DELPHINE ROY BC 1238 5 3 216 92 304 30.26% 3* SHERRY MAYHEWM BC 2116 3 5 221 102 374 27.27% 4* CHERYL BRIETKOPF BC 0649 3 5 177 87 342 25.43% 5 HELENE BOUDREAU BC 2112 2 6 179 85 350 24.28% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SUSAN MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 HELENE BOUDREAU W 35/4 13 20 65.00 4 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 35/7 15 34 44.11 3 SHERRY MAYHEWM W 37/27 17 54 31.48 2 DELPHINE ROY W 35/3 12 24 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 HELENE BOUDREAU W 36/17 14 50 28.00 4 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 36/9 12 36 33.33 3 SHERRY MAYHEWM W 37/15 16 34 47.05 2 DELPHINE ROY L 5/36 3 26 11.53 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 7 L 1 102 278 36.69 2 DELPHINE ROY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 SHERRY MAYHEWM W 35/30 13 58 22.41 4 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 16/37 9 38 23.68 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 HELENE BOUDREAU L 16/35 10 38 26.31 1 SUSAN MACDONALD L 3/35 3 24 12.50 3 SHERRY MAYHEWM W 37/18 14 46 30.43 4 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 37/10 17 34 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 HELENE BOUDREAU W 36/19 13 40 32.50 1 SUSAN MACDONALD W 36/5 13 26 50.00 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 5 L 3 92 304 30.26 3* SHERRY MAYHEWM - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DELPHINE ROY L 30/35 13 58 22.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 HELENE BOUDREAU W 35/21 15 52 28.84 1 SUSAN MACDONALD L 27/37 13 54 24.07 4 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 35/13 15 30 50.00 2 DELPHINE ROY L 18/37 7 46 15.21 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 HELENE BOUDREAU W 35/20 15 40 37.50 1 SUSAN MACDONALD L 15/37 9 34 26.47 4 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 26/37 15 60 25.00 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 102 374 27.27 4* CHERYL BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 HELENE BOUDREAU W 40/27 12 54 22.22 2 DELPHINE ROY W 37/16 15 38 39.47 1 SUSAN MACDONALD L 7/35 7 34 20.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 SHERRY MAYHEWM L 13/35 9 30 30.00 5 HELENE BOUDREAU L 24/36 16 56 28.57 2 DELPHINE ROY L 10/37 7 34 20.58 1 SUSAN MACDONALD L 9/36 4 36 11.11 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 SHERRY MAYHEWM W 37/26 17 60 28.33 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 87 342 25.43 5 HELENE BOUDREAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 27/40 8 54 14.81 1 SUSAN MACDONALD L 4/35 3 20 15.00 3 SHERRY MAYHEWM L 21/35 12 52 23.07 2 DELPHINE ROY W 35/16 14 38 36.84 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 36/24 20 56 35.71 1 SUSAN MACDONALD L 17/36 11 50 22.00 3 SHERRY MAYHEWM L 20/35 11 40 27.50 2 DELPHINE ROY L 19/36 6 40 15.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 23%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 85 350 24.28 WOMEN - CLASS E (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 MARY DICKIE BC 0807 8 0 246 53 312 16.98% 2 VIOLET ANDERSON BC 4227 6 2 218 60 322 18.63% 3 FAITH JUELL BC 1157 3 5 175 32 338 9.46% 4 ALICE LAFLAMME BC 0578 2 6 161 41 430 9.53% 5 SUE HELGESON BC 1809 1 7 109 24 402 5.97% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 MARY DICKIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 30/10 4 46 8.69 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 31/7 7 38 18.42 2 VIOLET ANDERSON W 31/20 6 48 12.50 3 FAITH JUELL W 30/7 8 28 28.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 32/14 6 38 15.78 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 30/9 6 38 15.78 2 VIOLET ANDERSON W 31/13 8 34 23.52 3 FAITH JUELL W 31/15 8 42 19.04 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 8 L 0 53 312 16.98 2 VIOLET ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 FAITH JUELL W 32/13 9 42 21.42 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 32/6 9 34 26.47 1 MARY DICKIE L 20/31 6 48 12.50 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 30/15 8 40 20.00 3 FAITH JUELL W 30/18 8 30 26.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 30/11 8 52 15.38 1 MARY DICKIE L 13/31 3 34 8.82 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 31/13 9 42 21.42 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 6 L 2 60 322 18.63 3 FAITH JUELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 VIOLET ANDERSON L 13/32 1 42 2.38 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 31/22 3 56 5.35 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 31/8 3 38 7.89 1 MARY DICKIE L 7/30 4 28 14.28 2 VIOLET ANDERSON L 18/30 5 30 16.66 4 ALICE LAFLAMME L 29/34 8 62 12.90 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 31/13 4 40 10.00 1 MARY DICKIE L 15/31 4 42 9.52 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 32 338 9.46 4 ALICE LAFLAMME - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 SUE HELGESON W 32/17 6 70 8.57 3 FAITH JUELL L 22/31 4 56 7.14 1 MARY DICKIE L 7/31 3 38 7.89 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 VIOLET ANDERSON L 15/30 3 40 7.50 5 SUE HELGESON L 29/30 6 84 7.14 3 FAITH JUELL W 34/29 12 62 19.35 1 MARY DICKIE L 9/30 3 38 7.89 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 VIOLET ANDERSON L 13/31 4 42 9.52 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 41 430 9.53 5 SUE HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ALICE LAFLAMME L 17/32 4 70 5.71 1 MARY DICKIE L 10/30 3 46 6.52 2 VIOLET ANDERSON L 6/32 1 34 2.94 3 FAITH JUELL L 8/31 2 38 5.26 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 30/29 4 84 4.76 1 MARY DICKIE L 14/32 3 38 7.89 2 VIOLET ANDERSON L 11/30 4 52 7.69 3 FAITH JUELL L 13/31 3 40 7.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 8%) TOTALS W 1 L 7 24 402 5.97 MEN - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TONY RONDOW BC 0600 9 1 401 280 480 58.33% 2 VIC VALLEE BC 2916 8 2 405 283 536 52.79% 3 BOB TASCHNER BC 2914 5 5 306 214 500 42.80% 4 JERRY MELISSA BC 0534 4 6 290 227 480 47.29% 5 TOM BALAZS BC 4169 3 7 243 170 454 37.44% 6 LLOYD OSBORNE BC 0702 1 9 279 192 466 41.20% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TONY RONDOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 BOB TASCHNER W 41/15 29 52 55.76 2 VIC VALLEE L 35/40 40 76 52.63 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 41/22 23 42 54.76 5 TOM BALAZS W 41/5 20 38 52.63 4 JERRY MELISSA W 41/18 36 52 69.23 3 BOB TASCHNER W 41/13 21 36 58.33 2 VIC VALLEE W 40/33 40 62 64.51 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 40/12 21 34 61.76 5 TOM BALAZS W 41/12 24 40 60.00 4 JERRY MELISSA W 40/29 26 48 54.16 (Was 57%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 280 480 58.33 2 VIC VALLEE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 41/28 18 38 47.36 1 TONY RONDOW W 40/35 40 76 52.63 5 TOM BALAZS L 39/40 25 64 39.06 4 JERRY MELISSA W 41/26 32 50 64.00 3 BOB TASCHNER W 44/32 27 52 51.92 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 40/24 28 52 53.84 1 TONY RONDOW L 33/40 38 62 61.29 5 TOM BALAZS W 44/7 20 34 58.82 4 JERRY MELISSA W 43/33 31 54 57.40 3 BOB TASCHNER W 40/28 24 54 44.44 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 283 536 52.79 3 BOB TASCHNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TONY RONDOW L 15/41 23 52 44.23 5 TOM BALAZS W 41/36 25 56 44.64 4 JERRY MELISSA W 42/15 25 46 54.34 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 40/33 23 62 37.09 2 VIC VALLEE L 32/44 22 52 42.30 1 TONY RONDOW L 13/41 14 36 38.88 5 TOM BALAZS W 42/28 24 50 48.00 4 JERRY MELISSA L 12/40 12 40 30.00 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 41/32 26 52 50.00 2 VIC VALLEE L 28/40 20 54 37.03 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 214 500 42.80 4 JERRY MELISSA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 TOM BALAZS W 42/22 21 56 37.50 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 40/30 24 46 52.17 3 BOB TASCHNER L 15/42 17 46 36.95 2 VIC VALLEE L 26/41 27 50 54.00 1 TONY RONDOW L 18/41 29 52 55.76 5 TOM BALAZS L 7/42 6 32 18.75 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 40/28 30 56 53.57 3 BOB TASCHNER W 40/12 21 40 52.50 2 VIC VALLEE L 33/43 28 54 51.85 1 TONY RONDOW L 29/40 24 48 50.00 (Was 51%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 227 480 47.29 5 TOM BALAZS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 JERRY MELISSA L 22/42 17 56 30.35 3 BOB TASCHNER L 36/41 24 56 42.85 2 VIC VALLEE W 40/39 25 64 39.06 1 TONY RONDOW L 5/41 10 38 26.31 6 LLOYD OSBORNE L 11/43 13 42 30.95 4 JERRY MELISSA W 42/7 17 32 53.12 3 BOB TASCHNER L 28/42 20 50 40.00 2 VIC VALLEE L 7/44 9 34 26.47 1 TONY RONDOW L 12/41 15 40 37.50 6 LLOYD OSBORNE W 40/27 20 42 47.61 (Was 47%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 170 454 37.44 6 LLOYD OSBORNE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 VIC VALLEE L 28/41 13 38 34.21 4 JERRY MELISSA L 30/40 21 46 45.65 1 TONY RONDOW L 22/41 16 42 38.09 3 BOB TASCHNER L 33/40 21 62 33.87 5 TOM BALAZS W 43/11 22 42 52.38 2 VIC VALLEE L 24/40 23 52 44.23 4 JERRY MELISSA L 28/40 27 56 48.21 1 TONY RONDOW L 12/40 11 34 32.35 3 BOB TASCHNER L 32/41 22 52 42.30 5 TOM BALAZS L 27/40 16 42 38.09 (Was 47%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 192 466 41.20 MEN - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ROY DAWE BC 2807 10 0 420 197 458 43.01% 2 BERT ALLEN BC 0556 6 4 354 185 496 37.29% 3 MIKE THOMPSON BC 3636 5 5 335 167 508 32.87% 4* SCOTT O`NEIL BC 0362 3 7 322 176 508 34.64% 5* LOU BUSCH BC 4857 3 7 272 158 470 33.61% 6* JOE BRIETKOPF BC 0648 3 7 273 162 520 31.15% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ROY DAWE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 SCOTT O`NEIL W 40/21 16 44 36.36 2 BERT ALLEN W 42/25 24 52 46.15 3 MIKE THOMPSON W 44/13 20 30 66.66 5 LOU BUSCH W 40/36 17 46 36.95 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/21 16 50 32.00 4 SCOTT O`NEIL W 45/30 21 50 42.00 2 BERT ALLEN W 43/29 21 50 42.00 3 MIKE THOMPSON W 40/39 23 66 34.84 5 LOU BUSCH W 44/9 23 40 57.50 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/12 16 30 53.33 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 197 458 43.01 2 BERT ALLEN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOE BRIETKOPF L 33/43 17 60 28.33 1 ROY DAWE L 25/42 20 52 38.46 5 LOU BUSCH W 43/15 21 46 45.65 4 SCOTT O`NEIL W 40/36 17 46 36.95 3 MIKE THOMPSON W 44/27 23 52 44.23 6 JOE BRIETKOPF L 17/40 11 40 27.50 1 ROY DAWE L 29/43 18 50 36.00 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/19 20 48 41.66 4 SCOTT O`NEIL W 42/36 20 56 35.71 3 MIKE THOMPSON W 40/23 18 46 39.13 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 185 496 37.29 3 MIKE THOMPSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/10 18 40 45.00 4 SCOTT O`NEIL W 40/20 14 46 30.43 1 ROY DAWE L 13/44 10 30 33.33 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/36 17 72 23.61 2 BERT ALLEN L 27/44 19 52 36.53 5 LOU BUSCH L 29/42 15 52 28.84 4 SCOTT O`NEIL W 40/32 21 54 38.88 1 ROY DAWE L 39/40 22 66 33.33 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/19 17 50 34.00 2 BERT ALLEN L 23/40 14 46 30.43 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 167 508 32.87 4* SCOTT O`NEIL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ROY DAWE L 21/40 12 44 27.27 3 MIKE THOMPSON L 20/40 11 46 23.91 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/18 26 62 41.93 2 BERT ALLEN L 36/40 16 46 34.78 5 LOU BUSCH W 45/32 25 54 46.29 1 ROY DAWE L 30/45 18 50 36.00 3 MIKE THOMPSON L 32/40 19 54 35.18 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/31 17 54 31.48 2 BERT ALLEN L 36/42 19 56 33.92 5 LOU BUSCH L 20/40 13 42 30.95 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 176 508 34.64 5* LOU BUSCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MIKE THOMPSON L 10/41 11 40 27.50 6 JOE BRIETKOPF L 29/41 19 52 36.53 2 BERT ALLEN L 15/43 13 46 28.26 1 ROY DAWE L 36/40 16 46 34.78 4 SCOTT O`NEIL L 32/45 20 54 37.03 3 MIKE THOMPSON W 42/29 21 52 40.38 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/12 17 50 34.00 2 BERT ALLEN L 19/41 13 48 27.08 1 ROY DAWE L 9/44 12 40 30.00 4 SCOTT O`NEIL W 40/20 16 42 38.09 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 158 470 33.61 6* JOE BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BERT ALLEN W 43/33 21 60 35.00 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/29 24 52 46.15 4 SCOTT O`NEIL L 18/42 19 62 30.64 3 MIKE THOMPSON L 36/42 20 72 27.77 1 ROY DAWE L 21/42 12 50 24.00 2 BERT ALLEN W 40/17 18 40 45.00 5 LOU BUSCH L 12/40 11 50 22.00 4 SCOTT O`NEIL L 31/40 15 54 27.77 3 MIKE THOMPSON L 19/41 15 50 30.00 1 ROY DAWE L 12/40 7 30 23.33 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 162 520 31.15 MEN - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# LORENZO FERRARA BC 4218 9 4 424 214 616 34.74% 2 SAM TOMASEVIC BC 3454 8 5 348 176 514 34.24% 3 RON DENMAN BC 0599 7 5 388 180 540 33.33% 4* LES ANDERSON BC 4226 6 6 361 195 552 35.32% 5* ALLAN CUMMINGS BC 1401 6 6 390 192 544 35.29% 6 VINCE HERKEL BC 3306 4 8 298 151 518 29.15% 7 DALE WALCH BC 1103 3 9 295 151 544 27.75% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# LORENZO FERRARA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 DALE WALCH W 35/27 23 64 35.93 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 37/24 15 40 37.50 2 SAM TOMASEVIC L 12/36 11 44 25.00 3 RON DENMAN L 26/37 17 58 29.31 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 VINCE HERKEL W 35/23 12 34 35.29 4 LES ANDERSON L 30/37 14 52 26.92 7 DALE WALCH L 34/38 21 64 32.81 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 36/25 26 64 40.62 2 SAM TOMASEVIC W 35/12 14 38 36.84 3 RON DENMAN W 35/30 16 56 28.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 VINCE HERKEL W 36/27 17 40 42.50 4 LES ANDERSON W 38/10 17 38 44.73 2 SAM TOMASEVIC W 35/2 11 24 45.83 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 9 L 4 214 616 34.74 2 SAM TOMASEVIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 LES ANDERSON W 36/33 26 62 41.93 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 LORENZO FERRARA W 36/12 19 44 43.18 6 VINCE HERKEL W 35/22 16 48 33.33 3 RON DENMAN L 20/37 10 44 22.72 7 DALE WALCH W 38/10 12 36 33.33 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 37/33 20 52 38.46 4 LES ANDERSON L 16/38 7 32 21.87 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 12/35 12 38 31.57 6 VINCE HERKEL W 35/10 13 30 43.33 3 RON DENMAN W 36/33 16 40 40.00 7 DALE WALCH W 38/13 16 34 47.05 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 7/35 8 30 26.66 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 2/35 1 24 4.16 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 8 L 5 176 514 34.24 3 RON DENMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 DALE WALCH W 35/21 16 38 42.10 4 LES ANDERSON W 35/19 18 38 47.36 1 LORENZO FERRARA W 37/26 19 58 32.75 2 SAM TOMASEVIC W 37/20 14 44 31.81 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 35/22 14 38 36.84 6 VINCE HERKEL W 35/13 16 40 40.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 DALE WALCH L 27/35 11 46 23.91 4 LES ANDERSON W 36/27 22 52 42.30 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 30/35 11 56 19.64 2 SAM TOMASEVIC L 33/36 14 40 35.00 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 24/36 12 46 26.08 6 VINCE HERKEL L 24/36 13 44 29.54 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 180 540 33.33 4* LES ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SAM TOMASEVIC L 33/36 25 62 40.32 6 VINCE HERKEL W 35/11 15 34 44.11 3 RON DENMAN L 19/35 13 38 34.21 7 DALE WALCH W 37/29 17 48 35.41 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 38/34 18 54 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 LORENZO FERRARA W 37/30 20 52 38.46 2 SAM TOMASEVIC W 38/16 15 32 46.87 6 VINCE HERKEL L 30/38 15 52 28.84 3 RON DENMAN L 27/36 19 52 36.53 7 DALE WALCH W 38/29 18 46 39.13 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 19/36 11 44 25.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 10/38 9 38 23.68 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 195 552 35.32 5* ALLAN CUMMINGS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 VINCE HERKEL W 40/21 19 44 43.18 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 24/37 13 40 32.50 7 DALE WALCH W 38/14 17 40 42.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LES ANDERSON L 34/38 16 54 29.62 3 RON DENMAN L 22/35 10 38 26.31 2 SAM TOMASEVIC L 33/37 18 52 34.61 6 VINCE HERKEL L 31/37 19 58 32.75 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 25/36 25 64 39.06 7 DALE WALCH W 36/13 10 34 29.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LES ANDERSON W 36/19 15 44 34.09 3 RON DENMAN W 36/24 15 46 32.60 2 SAM TOMASEVIC W 35/7 15 30 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 36%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 192 544 35.29 6 VINCE HERKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 21/40 14 44 31.81 4 LES ANDERSON L 11/35 5 34 14.70 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 SAM TOMASEVIC L 22/35 12 48 25.00 7 DALE WALCH L 23/36 12 48 25.00 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 23/35 9 34 26.47 3 RON DENMAN L 13/35 9 40 22.50 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 37/31 18 58 31.03 4 LES ANDERSON W 38/30 16 52 30.76 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 SAM TOMASEVIC L 10/35 6 30 20.00 7 DALE WALCH W 37/30 18 46 39.13 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 27/36 14 40 35.00 3 RON DENMAN W 36/24 18 44 40.90 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 36%) TOTALS W 4 L 8 151 518 29.15 7 DALE WALCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 LORENZO FERRARA L 27/35 18 64 28.12 3 RON DENMAN L 21/35 11 38 28.94 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 14/38 10 40 25.00 4 LES ANDERSON L 29/37 13 48 27.08 6 VINCE HERKEL W 36/23 15 48 31.25 2 SAM TOMASEVIC L 10/38 3 36 8.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 LORENZO FERRARA W 38/34 22 64 34.37 3 RON DENMAN W 35/27 14 46 30.43 5 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 13/36 4 34 11.76 4 LES ANDERSON L 29/38 16 46 34.78 6 VINCE HERKEL L 30/37 15 46 32.60 2 SAM TOMASEVIC L 13/38 10 34 29.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 3 L 9 151 544 27.75 MEN - CLASS D (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 HERB BOSCHMAN BC 2921 9 3 403 182 576 31.59% 2 CHUCK BRUCE BC 0703 8 4 384 181 552 32.78% 3 NICK CULIC BC 3486 7 5 367 171 558 30.64% 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM BC 1610 6 6 356 176 582 30.24% 5* SANTE MICHIELIN BC 4061 5 7 374 173 564 30.67% 6* ROBIN DEGRAAF BC 0061 5 7 371 161 554 29.06% 7 RAY JEROME BC 1282 2 10 275 128 506 25.29% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 HERB BOSCHMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SANTE MICHIELIN L 17/37 10 38 26.31 3 NICK CULIC L 26/37 14 42 33.33 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM W 37/22 12 38 31.57 7 RAY JEROME W 35/21 16 56 28.57 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 37/30 14 56 25.00 2 CHUCK BRUCE W 35/28 20 56 35.71 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SANTE MICHIELIN W 39/30 16 40 40.00 3 NICK CULIC W 38/15 16 42 38.09 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM W 35/32 22 62 35.48 7 RAY JEROME W 36/19 11 40 27.50 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 38/29 16 54 29.62 2 CHUCK BRUCE L 30/36 15 52 28.84 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 9 L 3 182 576 31.59 2 CHUCK BRUCE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 38/17 17 38 44.73 3 NICK CULIC L 30/36 16 58 27.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 RAY JEROME W 40/14 19 44 43.18 5 SANTE MICHIELIN W 36/28 11 50 22.00 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM W 37/21 16 38 42.10 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 28/35 18 56 32.14 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 37/31 16 48 33.33 3 NICK CULIC L 8/40 7 34 20.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 RAY JEROME W 35/27 14 42 33.33 5 SANTE MICHIELIN W 37/28 16 50 32.00 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM L 22/36 14 42 33.33 1 HERB BOSCHMAN W 36/30 17 52 32.69 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 181 552 32.78 3 NICK CULIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 RAY JEROME L 11/37 5 30 16.66 2 CHUCK BRUCE W 36/30 15 58 25.86 1 HERB BOSCHMAN W 37/26 17 42 40.47 5 SANTE MICHIELIN W 36/33 17 48 35.41 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 36/30 14 54 25.92 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM L 28/35 19 64 29.68 7 RAY JEROME L 27/35 8 42 19.04 2 CHUCK BRUCE W 40/8 16 34 47.05 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 15/38 9 42 21.42 5 SANTE MICHIELIN W 38/33 19 60 31.66 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 26/35 14 40 35.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM W 37/20 18 44 40.90 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 171 558 30.64 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 SANTE MICHIELIN W 37/19 15 50 30.00 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 20/35 12 50 24.00 7 RAY JEROME W 36/25 15 44 34.09 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 22/37 8 38 21.05 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 CHUCK BRUCE L 21/37 10 38 26.31 3 NICK CULIC W 35/28 23 64 35.93 5 SANTE MICHIELIN L 25/35 15 54 27.77 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 36/34 13 52 25.00 7 RAY JEROME W 36/25 14 44 31.81 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 32/35 21 62 33.87 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 CHUCK BRUCE W 36/22 19 42 45.23 3 NICK CULIC L 20/37 11 44 25.00 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 176 582 30.24 5* SANTE MICHIELIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM L 19/37 11 50 22.00 1 HERB BOSCHMAN W 37/17 15 38 39.47 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 35/22 12 40 30.00 3 NICK CULIC L 33/36 17 48 35.41 2 CHUCK BRUCE L 28/36 11 50 22.00 7 RAY JEROME W 37/23 21 50 42.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM W 35/25 17 54 31.48 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 30/39 13 40 32.50 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 24/37 14 46 30.43 3 NICK CULIC L 33/38 15 60 25.00 2 CHUCK BRUCE L 28/37 13 50 26.00 7 RAY JEROME W 35/17 14 38 36.84 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 28%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 173 564 30.67 6* ROBIN DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CHUCK BRUCE L 17/38 9 38 23.68 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM W 35/20 15 50 30.00 5 SANTE MICHIELIN L 22/35 8 40 20.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 NICK CULIC L 30/36 14 54 25.92 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 30/37 12 56 21.42 7 RAY JEROME W 35/14 12 30 40.00 2 CHUCK BRUCE L 31/37 13 48 27.08 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM L 34/36 12 52 23.07 5 SANTE MICHIELIN W 37/24 16 46 34.78 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 NICK CULIC W 35/26 17 40 42.50 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 29/38 14 54 25.92 7 RAY JEROME W 36/18 19 46 41.30 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 161 554 29.06 7 RAY JEROME - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 NICK CULIC W 37/11 12 30 40.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM L 25/36 11 44 25.00 2 CHUCK BRUCE L 14/40 11 44 25.00 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 21/35 13 56 23.21 5 SANTE MICHIELIN L 23/37 17 50 34.00 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 14/35 6 30 20.00 3 NICK CULIC W 35/27 12 42 28.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 MIKE CUNNINGHAM L 25/36 9 44 20.45 2 CHUCK BRUCE L 27/35 9 42 21.42 1 HERB BOSCHMAN L 19/36 7 40 17.50 5 SANTE MICHIELIN L 17/35 7 38 18.42 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 18/36 14 46 30.43 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 2 L 10 128 506 25.29 MEN - CLASS E (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DAN COFFIN BC 3287 8 2 303 112 436 25.68% 2 DON MCSWAIN BC 1237 7 3 265 91 388 23.45% 3* FRED GORDON BC 0663 5 5 252 91 410 22.19% 4* WILF BLANCHARD BC 0557 5 5 245 92 422 21.80% 5 PHIL ERICKSON BC 0651 3 7 213 78 438 17.80% 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE BC 2929 2 8 204 94 410 22.92% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DAN COFFIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 30/9 11 38 28.94 2 DON MCSWAIN W 32/16 13 36 36.11 3 FRED GORDON W 31/15 10 44 22.72 4 WILF BLANCHARD W 31/25 8 50 16.00 5 PHIL ERICKSON W 33/12 11 40 27.50 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE L 26/32 9 44 20.45 2 DON MCSWAIN W 32/23 13 42 30.95 3 FRED GORDON W 30/25 11 52 21.15 4 WILF BLANCHARD L 27/30 12 50 24.00 5 PHIL ERICKSON W 31/18 14 40 35.00 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 112 436 25.68 2 DON MCSWAIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 FRED GORDON L 7/30 4 22 18.18 1 DAN COFFIN L 16/32 7 36 19.44 5 PHIL ERICKSON W 31/26 7 50 14.00 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 33/14 9 36 25.00 4 WILF BLANCHARD W 31/10 9 34 26.47 3 FRED GORDON W 30/21 7 48 14.58 1 DAN COFFIN L 23/32 9 42 21.42 5 PHIL ERICKSON W 31/23 13 56 23.21 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 31/9 12 34 35.29 4 WILF BLANCHARD W 32/7 14 30 46.66 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 91 388 23.45 3* FRED GORDON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DON MCSWAIN W 30/7 11 22 50.00 4 WILF BLANCHARD L 23/35 9 54 16.66 1 DAN COFFIN L 15/31 7 44 15.90 5 PHIL ERICKSON W 30/6 7 30 23.33 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE L 11/30 5 34 14.70 2 DON MCSWAIN L 21/30 7 48 14.58 4 WILF BLANCHARD W 35/26 14 48 29.16 1 DAN COFFIN L 25/30 10 52 19.23 5 PHIL ERICKSON W 32/15 10 38 26.31 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 30/24 11 40 27.50 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 91 410 22.19 4* WILF BLANCHARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 PHIL ERICKSON L 14/31 6 38 15.78 3 FRED GORDON W 35/23 14 54 25.92 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 30/21 12 42 28.57 1 DAN COFFIN L 25/31 5 50 10.00 2 DON MCSWAIN L 10/31 3 34 8.82 5 PHIL ERICKSON W 35/16 15 40 37.50 3 FRED GORDON L 26/35 11 48 22.91 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 33/24 11 36 30.55 1 DAN COFFIN W 30/27 11 50 22.00 2 DON MCSWAIN L 7/32 4 30 13.33 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 92 422 21.80 5 PHIL ERICKSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 WILF BLANCHARD W 31/14 9 38 23.68 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 31/26 11 54 20.37 2 DON MCSWAIN L 26/31 6 50 12.00 3 FRED GORDON L 6/30 1 30 3.33 1 DAN COFFIN L 12/33 6 40 15.00 4 WILF BLANCHARD L 16/35 8 40 20.00 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 35/15 15 52 28.84 2 DON MCSWAIN L 23/31 9 56 16.07 3 FRED GORDON L 15/32 5 38 13.15 1 DAN COFFIN L 18/31 8 40 20.00 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 78 438 17.80 6 LOUIS LEVESQUE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DAN COFFIN L 9/30 7 38 18.42 5 PHIL ERICKSON L 26/31 9 54 16.66 4 WILF BLANCHARD L 21/30 12 42 28.57 2 DON MCSWAIN L 14/33 4 36 11.11 3 FRED GORDON W 30/11 12 34 35.29 1 DAN COFFIN W 32/26 13 44 29.54 5 PHIL ERICKSON L 15/35 12 52 23.07 4 WILF BLANCHARD L 24/33 9 36 25.00 2 DON MCSWAIN L 9/31 5 34 14.70 3 FRED GORDON L 24/30 11 40 27.50 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 94 410 22.92 MEN - CLASS F (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TOM HARRIS BC 0525 10 0 312 95 388 24.48% 2 PHIL KREPPS BC 1460 6 4 256 79 408 19.36% 3* DAVE DUNLOP BC 2111 5 5 239 81 398 20.35% 4* CHRIS MACDONALD BC 4086 5 5 252 83 460 18.04% 5** JOHN HAMLER BC 0119 2 8 162 57 416 13.70% 6** ADAM LEBLANC BC 1490 2 8 184 60 442 13.57% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TOM HARRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CHRIS MACDONALD W 32/19 10 42 23.80 6 ADAM LEBLANC W 31/21 7 38 18.42 5 JOHN HAMLER W 30/2 7 22 31.81 2 PHIL KREPPS W 31/26 10 42 23.80 3 DAVE DUNLOP W 30/6 9 36 25.00 4 CHRIS MACDONALD W 32/15 11 38 28.94 6 ADAM LEBLANC W 30/10 14 42 33.33 5 JOHN HAMLER W 32/27 9 48 18.75 2 PHIL KREPPS W 31/11 9 30 30.00 3 DAVE DUNLOP W 33/29 9 50 18.00 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 95 388 24.48 2 PHIL KREPPS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DAVE DUNLOP L 14/30 6 44 13.63 4 CHRIS MACDONALD W 31/23 11 56 19.64 6 ADAM LEBLANC W 31/6 8 30 26.66 1 TOM HARRIS L 26/31 9 42 21.42 5 JOHN HAMLER W 30/5 7 32 21.87 3 DAVE DUNLOP W 32/13 10 32 31.25 4 CHRIS MACDONALD L 21/30 6 44 13.63 6 ADAM LEBLANC W 30/25 10 52 19.23 1 TOM HARRIS L 11/31 4 30 13.33 5 JOHN HAMLER W 30/15 8 46 17.39 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 79 408 19.36 3* DAVE DUNLOP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 PHIL KREPPS W 30/14 9 44 20.45 5 JOHN HAMLER W 30/8 11 34 32.35 4 CHRIS MACDONALD L 8/31 3 32 9.37 6 ADAM LEBLANC L 29/32 8 58 13.79 1 TOM HARRIS L 6/30 5 36 13.88 2 PHIL KREPPS L 13/32 4 32 12.50 5 JOHN HAMLER W 30/7 9 32 28.12 4 CHRIS MACDONALD W 32/20 11 52 21.15 6 ADAM LEBLANC W 32/5 10 28 35.71 1 TOM HARRIS L 29/33 11 50 22.00 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 81 398 20.35 4* CHRIS MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM HARRIS L 19/32 6 42 14.28 2 PHIL KREPPS L 23/31 10 56 17.85 3 DAVE DUNLOP W 31/8 11 32 34.37 5 JOHN HAMLER W 30/12 10 38 26.31 6 ADAM LEBLANC W 32/17 11 46 23.91 1 TOM HARRIS L 15/32 7 38 18.42 2 PHIL KREPPS W 30/21 8 44 18.18 3 DAVE DUNLOP L 20/32 8 52 15.38 5 JOHN HAMLER L 22/33 5 64 7.81 6 ADAM LEBLANC W 30/21 7 48 14.58 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 83 460 18.04 5** JOHN HAMLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ADAM LEBLANC W 31/17 10 46 21.73 3 DAVE DUNLOP L 8/30 6 34 17.64 1 TOM HARRIS L 2/30 0 22 None 4 CHRIS MACDONALD L 12/30 5 38 13.15 2 PHIL KREPPS L 5/30 2 32 6.25 6 ADAM LEBLANC L 22/30 5 54 9.25 3 DAVE DUNLOP L 7/30 3 32 9.37 1 TOM HARRIS L 27/32 10 48 20.83 4 CHRIS MACDONALD W 33/22 10 64 15.62 2 PHIL KREPPS L 15/30 6 46 13.04 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 57 416 13.70 6** ADAM LEBLANC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JOHN HAMLER L 17/31 7 46 15.21 1 TOM HARRIS L 21/31 5 38 13.15 2 PHIL KREPPS L 6/31 3 30 10.00 3 DAVE DUNLOP W 32/29 8 58 13.79 4 CHRIS MACDONALD L 17/32 4 46 8.69 5 JOHN HAMLER W 30/22 7 54 12.96 1 TOM HARRIS L 10/30 7 42 16.66 2 PHIL KREPPS L 25/30 9 52 17.30 3 DAVE DUNLOP L 5/32 3 28 10.71 4 CHRIS MACDONALD L 21/30 7 48 14.58 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 60 442 13.57 MEN - CLASS G (25 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SPEED POWDER BC 1811 9 1 254 53 450 11.77% 2 BRIAN STANTON BC 0893 8 2 247 56 404 13.86% 3* ROY DAWE SR BC 1457 5 5 222 51 390 13.07% 4* FRANK HUBICK BC 0880 5 5 168 23 418 5.50% 5 TERRY MAYHEW BC 2118 2 8 177 39 516 7.55% 6 IRVINE THORPE BC 0527 1 9 117 20 426 4.69% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SPEED POWDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 TERRY MAYHEW W 30/5 6 42 14.28 2 BRIAN STANTON W 25/23 5 48 10.41 6 IRVINE THORPE W 25/15 4 44 9.09 3 ROY DAWE SR W 25/22 6 50 12.00 4 FRANK HUBICK W 26/21 4 46 8.69 5 TERRY MAYHEW W 25/23 7 66 10.60 2 BRIAN STANTON W 25/16 6 38 15.78 6 IRVINE THORPE W 27/2 6 28 21.42 3 ROY DAWE SR W 25/19 5 38 13.15 4 FRANK HUBICK L 21/25 4 50 8.00 (Was 10%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 53 450 11.77 2 BRIAN STANTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 FRANK HUBICK W 25/2 6 26 23.07 1 SPEED POWDER L 23/25 7 48 14.58 3 ROY DAWE SR W 25/22 4 54 7.40 5 TERRY MAYHEW W 25/14 4 52 7.69 6 IRVINE THORPE W 25/11 4 34 11.76 4 FRANK HUBICK W 30/7 8 28 28.57 1 SPEED POWDER L 16/25 6 38 15.78 3 ROY DAWE SR W 25/5 8 30 26.66 5 TERRY MAYHEW W 27/19 6 48 12.50 6 IRVINE THORPE W 26/9 3 46 6.52 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 56 404 13.86 3* ROY DAWE SR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 IRVINE THORPE W 25/1 4 26 15.38 4 FRANK HUBICK W 27/4 8 26 30.76 2 BRIAN STANTON L 22/25 5 54 9.25 1 SPEED POWDER L 22/25 7 50 14.00 5 TERRY MAYHEW W 27/19 3 48 6.25 6 IRVINE THORPE W 26/10 4 34 11.76 4 FRANK HUBICK L 24/25 5 56 8.92 2 BRIAN STANTON L 5/25 2 30 6.66 1 SPEED POWDER L 19/25 7 38 18.42 5 TERRY MAYHEW W 25/3 6 28 21.42 (Was 7%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 51 390 13.07 4* FRANK HUBICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BRIAN STANTON L 2/25 0 26 None 3 ROY DAWE SR L 4/27 0 26 None 5 TERRY MAYHEW W 25/20 5 42 11.90 6 IRVINE THORPE L 8/26 2 38 5.26 1 SPEED POWDER L 21/26 2 46 4.34 2 BRIAN STANTON L 7/30 1 28 3.57 3 ROY DAWE SR W 25/24 3 56 5.35 5 TERRY MAYHEW W 25/22 4 60 6.66 6 IRVINE THORPE W 26/10 3 46 6.52 1 SPEED POWDER W 25/21 3 50 6.00 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 23 418 5.50 5 TERRY MAYHEW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SPEED POWDER L 5/30 2 42 4.76 6 IRVINE THORPE W 25/17 4 66 6.06 4 FRANK HUBICK L 20/25 3 42 7.14 2 BRIAN STANTON L 14/25 1 52 1.92 3 ROY DAWE SR L 19/27 4 48 8.33 1 SPEED POWDER L 23/25 6 66 9.09 6 IRVINE THORPE W 27/16 6 64 9.37 4 FRANK HUBICK L 22/25 8 60 13.33 2 BRIAN STANTON L 19/27 4 48 8.33 3 ROY DAWE SR L 3/25 1 28 3.57 (Was 10%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 39 516 7.55 6 IRVINE THORPE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ROY DAWE SR L 1/25 0 26 None 5 TERRY MAYHEW L 17/25 1 66 1.51 1 SPEED POWDER L 15/25 3 44 6.81 4 FRANK HUBICK W 26/8 7 38 18.42 2 BRIAN STANTON L 11/25 3 34 8.82 3 ROY DAWE SR L 10/26 3 34 8.82 5 TERRY MAYHEW L 16/27 2 64 3.12 1 SPEED POWDER L 2/27 0 28 None 4 FRANK HUBICK L 10/26 1 46 2.17 2 BRIAN STANTON L 9/26 0 46 None (Was 16%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 20 426 4.69