NORTH SHORE NORTH VANCOUVER OPEN SANCTIONED TOURNAMENT NUMBER 61-05-001 04/17/05 JUNIOR BOYS CLASS A (30 Points) W-L H/G Rs S/P PERCENT 1st SAM DEGRAAF .......... CLOVERDALE 0-5 11.36% 19 204 9.31% MEN - CLASS A (40 Points) W-L H/G Rs S/P PERCENT 1st JIM BALL ............. CENTRAL PARK 5-0 52.50% 110 244 45.08% 2nd JACK JOHNSON ......... WASHINGTON 4-1 68.75% 114 216 52.77% 3rd LLOYD REYKLIN ........ CENTRAL PARK 3-2 45.23% 75 226 33.18% MEN - CLASS B (40 Points) W-L H/G Rs S/P PERCENT 1st RAY JEROME ........... NANAIMO 2-3 41.30% 86 260 33.07% 2nd SAM TOMASEVIC ........ CENTRAL PARK 1-4 50.00% 65 214 30.37% 3rd ROBIN DEGRAAF ........ CLOVERDALE 0-5 37.50% 65 220 29.54% MEN - CLASS C (35 Points) W-L H/G Rs S/P PERCENT 1st SCOTT O`NEIL ......... CENTRAL PARK 5-0 43.18% 73 218 33.48% 2nd VINCE HERKEL ......... LADYSMITH 4-1 37.50% 67 224 29.91% 3rd DEREK GREVELING ...... DRY CREEK 3-2 38.63% 61 220 27.72% 4th DARRYL OLSON ......... ABBOTSFORD 2-3 27.50% 52 242 21.48% 5th PAUL ONYSCHTSCHUK .... DRY CREEK 1-4 29.54% 49 248 19.75% 6th TOM HARRIS ........... ABBOTSFORD 0-5 21.05% 36 240 15.00% MEN - CLASS D (30 Points) W-L H/G Rs S/P PERCENT 1st SAM TAYLOR ........... NANAIMO 4-0 28.12% 27 138 19.56% 2nd PHIL KREPPS .......... CLOVERDALE 3-1 21.05% 24 174 13.79% 3rd KEN BUCKLE ........... NORTHSHORE 2-2 34.61% 30 142 21.12% 4th SYD ANDERSON ......... ABBOTSFORD 1-3 16.66% 20 178 11.23% 5th RON BIGHAM ........... CLOVERDALE 0-4 15.00% 15 160 9.37% MIXED - CLASS A (40 Points) W-L H/G Rs S/P PERCENT 1st WILF GREGORY ......... NANAIMO 5-1 79.16% 202 300 67.33% 2nd MURRAY RAYNER ........ NANAIMO 3-3 67.50% 188 316 59.49% 3rd * ELYSE BRUNELLE ....... CENTRAL PARK 2-4 59.37% 187 342 54.67% 4th * RUBY MILLER .......... NANAIMO 2-4 60.41% 161 298 54.02% MIXED - CLASS B (30 Points) W-L H/G Rs S/P PERCENT 1st # SUE BERTRAND ......... CENTRAL PARK 5-1 45.83% 77 230 33.47% 2nd CHERYL DEGRAAF ....... CLOVERDALE 4-2 38.46% 55 194 28.35% 3rd DEBBIE BUCKLE ........ NORTHSHORE 3-2 35.71% 51 198 25.75% 4th * BUSTER BUCKLE ........ NORTH SHORE 2-3 27.08% 42 210 20.00% 5th * LINDA GREVELING ...... DRY CREEK 2-3 25.00% 25 156 16.02% (# INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) MEN - Class A/B 40 pts N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 JIM BALL BC 3443 5 0 202 110 244 45.08% 2 JACK JOHNSON WA 0110 4 1 205 114 216 52.77% 3 LLOYD REYKLIN BC 0369 3 2 147 75 226 33.18% 4 RAY JEROME BC 1282 2 3 161 86 260 33.07% 5 SAM TOMASEVIC BC 3454 1 4 113 65 214 30.37% 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF BC 0061 0 5 94 65 220 29.54% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 JIM BALL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 LLOYD REYKLIN W 42/17 21 40 52.50 4 RAY JEROME W 40/32 20 46 43.47 5 SAM TOMASEVIC W 40/26 21 56 37.50 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/11 17 36 47.22 2 JACK JOHNSON W 40/36 31 66 46.96 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 110 244 45.08 2 JACK JOHNSON - WA OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 SAM TOMASEVIC W 43/6 16 32 50.00 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 43/13 22 32 68.75 4 RAY JEROME W 42/28 25 52 48.07 3 LLOYD REYKLIN W 41/8 18 34 52.94 1 JIM BALL L 36/40 33 66 50.00 (Was 54%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 114 216 52.77 3 LLOYD REYKLIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JIM BALL L 17/42 12 40 30.00 5 SAM TOMASEVIC W 40/16 19 42 45.23 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/37 18 60 30.00 2 JACK JOHNSON L 8/41 6 34 17.64 4 RAY JEROME W 42/21 20 50 40.00 (Was 49%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 75 226 33.18 4 RAY JEROME - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/32 18 60 30.00 1 JIM BALL L 32/40 19 46 41.30 2 JACK JOHNSON L 28/42 19 52 36.53 5 SAM TOMASEVIC W 40/24 16 52 30.76 3 LLOYD REYKLIN L 21/42 14 50 28.00 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 86 260 33.07 5 SAM TOMASEVIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JACK JOHNSON L 6/43 7 32 21.87 3 LLOYD REYKLIN L 16/40 13 42 30.95 1 JIM BALL L 26/40 19 56 33.92 4 RAY JEROME L 24/40 10 52 19.23 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 41/1 16 32 50.00 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 65 214 30.37 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 RAY JEROME L 32/40 18 60 30.00 2 JACK JOHNSON L 13/43 12 32 37.50 3 LLOYD REYKLIN L 37/40 22 60 36.66 1 JIM BALL L 11/40 8 36 22.22 5 SAM TOMASEVIC L 1/41 5 32 15.62 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 65 220 29.54 MEN - CLASS C (35 Points N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SCOTT O`NEIL BC 0362 5 0 178 73 218 33.48% 2 VINCE HERKEL BC 3306 4 1 165 67 224 29.91% 3 DEREK GREVELING BC 0986 3 2 143 61 220 27.72% 4 DARRYL OLSON BC 0921 2 3 154 52 242 21.48% 5 PAUL ONYSCHTSCHUK BC 0738 1 4 127 49 248 19.75% 6 TOM HARRIS BC 0525 0 5 110 36 240 15.00% > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SCOTT O`NEIL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 35/15 13 44 29.54 4 DARRYL OLSON W 35/17 12 38 31.57 2 VINCE HERKEL W 36/21 19 44 43.18 3 DEREK GREVELING W 35/28 15 54 27.77 6 TOM HARRIS W 37/20 14 38 36.84 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 5 L 0 73 218 33.48 2 VINCE HERKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DARRYL OLSON W 39/27 15 40 37.50 3 DEREK GREVELING W 35/9 10 28 35.71 1 SCOTT O`NEIL L 21/36 13 44 29.54 6 TOM HARRIS W 35/31 14 60 23.33 5 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 35/25 15 52 28.84 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 4 L 1 67 224 29.91 3 DEREK GREVELING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 TOM HARRIS W 35/12 12 38 31.57 2 VINCE HERKEL L 9/35 4 28 14.28 5 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 35/24 17 44 38.63 1 SCOTT O`NEIL L 28/35 13 54 24.07 4 DARRYL OLSON W 36/34 15 56 26.78 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 61 220 27.72 4 DARRYL OLSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 VINCE HERKEL L 27/39 11 40 27.50 1 SCOTT O`NEIL L 17/35 6 38 15.78 6 TOM HARRIS W 36/17 11 52 21.15 5 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK W 40/28 12 56 21.42 3 DEREK GREVELING L 34/36 12 56 21.42 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 52 242 21.48 5 PAUL ONYSCHTSCHUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SCOTT O`NEIL L 15/35 6 44 13.63 6 TOM HARRIS W 35/30 14 52 26.92 3 DEREK GREVELING L 24/35 13 44 29.54 4 DARRYL OLSON L 28/40 7 56 12.50 2 VINCE HERKEL L 25/35 9 52 17.30 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 1 L 4 49 248 19.75 6 TOM HARRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DEREK GREVELING L 12/35 3 38 7.89 5 PAU ONYSCHTSCHUK L 30/35 10 52 19.23 4 DARRYL OLSON L 17/36 4 52 7.69 2 VINCE HERKEL L 31/35 11 60 18.33 1 SCOTT O`NEIL L 20/37 8 38 21.05 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 0 L 5 36 240 15.00 MEN - CLASS D (30 Points N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SAM TAYLOR BC 1288 4 0 124 27 138 19.56% 2 PHIL KREPPS BC 1460 3 1 110 24 174 13.79% 3 KEN BUCKLE BC 3692 2 2 99 30 142 21.12% 4 SYD ANDERSON BC 0401 1 3 81 20 178 11.23% 5 RON BIGHAM BC 3457 0 4 50 15 160 9.37% > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SAM TAYLOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 RON BIGHAM W 33/9 5 36 13.88 3 KEN BUCKLE W 30/6 6 32 18.75 2 PHIL KREPPS W 30/15 9 32 28.12 4 SYD ANDERSON W 31/14 7 38 18.42 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 6%) TOTALS W 4 L 0 27 138 19.56 2 PHIL KREPPS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 SYD ANDERSON W 31/23 7 50 14.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 SAM TAYLOR L 15/30 2 32 6.25 3 KEN BUCKLE W 31/28 7 54 12.96 5 RON BIGHAM W 33/8 8 38 21.05 (Was 14%) TOTALS W 3 L 1 24 174 13.79 3 KEN BUCKLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 SAM TAYLOR L 6/30 2 32 6.25 5 RON BIGHAM W 31/5 9 26 34.61 2 PHIL KREPPS L 28/31 10 54 18.51 4 SYD ANDERSON W 34/11 9 30 30.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 2 L 2 30 142 21.12 4 SYD ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 PHIL KREPPS L 23/31 4 50 8.00 5 RON BIGHAM W 33/28 10 60 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 SAM TAYLOR L 14/31 3 38 7.89 3 KEN BUCKLE L 11/34 3 30 10.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 1 L 3 20 178 11.23 5 RON BIGHAM - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SAM TAYLOR L 9/33 2 36 5.55 4 SYD ANDERSON L 28/33 9 60 15.00 3 KEN BUCKLE L 5/31 2 26 7.69 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 PHIL KREPPS L 8/33 2 38 5.26 (Was 10%) TOTALS W 0 L 4 15 160 9.37 MIXED CLASS A (40 Points N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 WILF GREGORY BC 3293 5 1 237 202 300 67.33% 2 MURRAY RAYNER BC 4856 3 3 187 188 316 59.49% 3* ELYSE BRUNELLE BC 0306 2 4 186 187 342 54.67% 4* RUBY MILLER BC 4853 2 4 160 161 298 54.02% > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 WILF GREGORY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 40/21 37 56 66.07 2 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/17 38 48 79.16 4 RUBY MILLER W 41/4 25 34 73.52 3 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 35/43 28 54 51.85 2 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/23 42 60 70.00 4 RUBY MILLER W 40/28 32 48 66.66 (Was 60%) TOTALS W 5 L 1 202 300 67.33 2 MURRAY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 RUBY MILLER W 41/33 34 56 60.71 1 WILF GREGORY L 17/41 30 48 62.50 3 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 23/43 31 64 48.43 4 RUBY MILLER W 41/10 27 40 67.50 1 WILF GREGORY L 23/40 38 60 63.33 3 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 42/20 28 48 58.33 (Was 67%) TOTALS W 3 L 3 188 316 59.49 3* ELYSE BRUNELLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 WILF GREGORY L 21/40 31 56 55.35 4 RUBY MILLER L 25/41 27 50 54.00 2 MURRAY RAYNER W 43/23 38 64 59.37 1 WILF GREGORY W 43/35 31 54 57.40 4 RUBY MILLER L 34/44 39 70 55.71 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 20/42 21 48 43.75 (Was 67%) TOTALS W 2 L 4 187 342 54.67 4* RUBY MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 33/41 31 56 55.35 3 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 41/25 30 50 60.00 1 WILF GREGORY L 4/41 13 34 38.23 2 MURRAY RAYNER L 10/41 16 40 40.00 3 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 44/34 42 70 60.00 1 WILF GREGORY L 28/40 29 48 60.41 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 2 L 4 161 298 54.02 MIXED CLASS B (30 Points) N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 5 1 176 77 230 33.47% 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF BC 0062 4 2 163 55 194 28.35% 3 DEBBIE BUCKLE BC 1372 3 2 128 51 198 25.75% 4* BUSTER BUCKLE BC 3700 2 3 126 42 210 20.00% 5* LINDA GREVELING BC 0990 2 3 85 25 156 16.02% 6 SAM DEGRAAF BC 1467 0 5 63 19 204 9.31% > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BUSTER BUCKLE L 22/35 11 48 22.91 3 DEBBIE BUCKLE W 32/17 18 50 36.00 6 Sam Degraaf W 30/12 12 44 27.27 5 LINDA GREVELING W 30/6 11 24 45.83 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 30/22 14 38 36.84 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 32/17 11 26 42.30 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 5 L 1 77 230 33.47 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 Sam Degraaf W 30/11 8 42 19.04 5 LINDA GREVELING W 31/9 10 26 38.46 3 DEBBIE BUCKLE W 32/11 11 30 36.66 4 BUSTER BUCKLE W 31/10 9 32 28.12 1 SUE BERTRAND L 22/30 11 38 28.94 1 SUE BERTRAND L 17/32 6 26 23.07 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 4 L 2 55 194 28.35 3 DEBBIE BUCKLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LINDA GREVELING W 35/9 10 28 35.71 1 SUE BERTRAND L 17/32 11 50 22.00 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 11/32 5 30 16.66 6 Sam Degraaf W 32/12 11 42 26.19 4 BUSTER BUCKLE W 33/26 14 48 29.16 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 24%) TOTALS W 3 L 2 51 198 25.75 4* BUSTER BUCKLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SUE BERTRAND W 35/22 13 48 27.08 6 Sam Degraaf W 30/13 7 40 17.50 5 LINDA GREVELING L 25/31 7 42 16.66 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 10/31 3 32 9.37 3 DEBBIE BUCKLE L 26/33 12 48 25.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 27%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 42 210 20.00 5* LINDA GREVELING - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DEBBIE BUCKLE L 9/35 2 28 7.14 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 9/31 2 26 7.69 4 BUSTER BUCKLE W 31/25 10 42 23.80 1 SUE BERTRAND L 6/30 2 24 8.33 6 Sam Degraaf W 30/15 9 36 25.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 12%) TOTALS W 2 L 3 25 156 16.02 6 Sam Degraaf - {Pacer} OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 11/30 3 42 7.14 4 BUSTER BUCKLE L 13/30 3 40 7.50 1 SUE BERTRAND L 12/30 5 44 11.36 3 DEBBIE BUCKLE L 12/32 4 42 9.52 5 LINDA GREVELING L 15/30 4 36 11.11 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (PACER) TOTALS W 0 L 5 19 204 9.31