THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 WOMEN - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE BC 0306 9 1 407 269 406 66.25% 2* DOREEN MULOIN BC 9781 7 3 371 288 464 62.06% 3* CAROL ORMISTON BC 3903 7 3 340 254 450 56.44% 4 IDA BOSCHMAN BC 2923 5 5 259 195 416 46.87% 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF BC 0062 2 8 172 161 396 40.65% 6 ELAINE STERN BC 2936 0 10 110 117 392 29.84% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 40/30 25 46 54.34 6 ELAINE STERN W 41/7 16 24 66.66 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 42/6 24 34 70.58 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 34/41 36 58 62.06 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 45/33 50 78 64.10 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 40/0 23 32 71.87 6 ELAINE STERN W 42/6 19 30 63.33 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/0 18 24 75.00 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 41/7 27 34 79.41 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 42/15 31 46 67.39 (Was 66%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 269 406 66.25 2* DOREEN MULOIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 41/15 26 40 65.00 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 41/3 29 40 72.50 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 40/1 21 24 87.50 6 ELAINE STERN W 41/11 18 32 56.25 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 33/45 45 78 57.69 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 42/28 37 60 61.66 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 36/45 32 64 50.00 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 40/10 32 46 69.56 6 ELAINE STERN W 42/0 26 34 76.47 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 15/42 22 46 47.82 (Was 61%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 288 464 62.06 3* CAROL ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 15/41 19 40 47.50 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 40/6 20 30 66.66 6 ELAINE STERN W 41/22 23 50 46.00 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 41/34 37 58 63.79 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 43/4 18 26 69.23 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 28/42 32 60 53.33 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 41/17 24 50 48.00 6 ELAINE STERN W 44/17 29 48 60.41 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 7/41 16 34 47.05 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/33 36 54 66.66 (Was 57%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 254 450 56.44 4 IDA BOSCHMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ELAINE STERN W 42/13 17 42 40.47 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 3/41 17 40 42.50 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 6/42 12 34 35.29 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 42/27 26 52 50.00 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 4/43 6 26 23.07 6 ELAINE STERN W 41/15 18 48 37.50 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 45/36 37 64 57.81 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 0/40 6 24 25.00 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 43/1 22 32 68.75 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 33/40 34 54 62.96 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 195 416 46.87 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 30/40 23 46 50.00 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 6/40 10 30 33.33 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 1/40 8 24 33.33 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 27/42 21 52 40.38 6 ELAINE STERN W 40/15 21 46 45.65 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 0/40 10 32 31.25 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 17/41 18 50 36.00 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 10/40 23 46 50.00 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 1/43 9 32 28.12 6 ELAINE STERN W 40/4 18 38 47.36 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 161 396 40.65 6 ELAINE STERN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 13/42 9 42 21.42 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 7/41 5 24 20.83 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 22/41 18 50 36.00 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 11/41 9 32 28.12 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 15/40 14 46 30.43 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 15/41 10 48 20.83 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 6/42 9 30 30.00 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 17/44 21 48 43.75 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 0/42 14 34 41.17 5 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 4/40 8 38 21.05 (Was 49%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 117 392 29.84 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 WOMEN - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# CAROL WILKINSON BC 1510 8 3 423 246 506 48.61% 2 RUBY MILLER BC 4853 8 4 425 252 606 41.58% 3 NORMA BISCHOFF BC 1105 7 4 392 262 604 43.37% 4 CINDY HELGESON BC 3969 6 4 379 231 496 46.57% 5 VIVIAN FENDLE BC 0000 2 8 314 221 518 42.66% 6 YVONNE GREAVES BC 9767 1 9 215 149 438 34.01% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# CAROL WILKINSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CINDY HELGESON W 42/27 20 42 47.61 5 VIVIAN FENDLE W 44/13 26 38 68.42 2 RUBY MILLER L 15/40 9 30 30.00 3 NORMA BISCHOFF W 43/6 25 40 62.50 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 42/28 21 50 42.00 4 CINDY HELGESON L 38/43 18 48 37.50 5 VIVIAN FENDLE W 40/30 34 62 54.83 2 RUBY MILLER W 42/18 27 46 58.69 3 NORMA BISCHOFF L 33/45 22 56 39.28 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 41/12 18 34 52.94 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 RUBY MILLER W 43/28 26 60 43.33 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 246 506 48.61 2 RUBY MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 42/27 28 58 48.27 4 CINDY HELGESON L 18/43 11 38 28.94 1 CAROL WILKINSON W 40/15 15 30 50.00 5 VIVIAN FENDLE W 40/29 20 56 35.71 3 NORMA BISCHOFF W 40/24 27 56 48.21 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 45/18 21 42 50.00 4 CINDY HELGESON L 32/41 18 50 36.00 1 CAROL WILKINSON L 18/42 19 46 41.30 5 VIVIAN FENDLE W 40/34 24 56 42.85 3 NORMA BISCHOFF W 41/33 21 50 42.00 3 NORMA BISCHOFF W 41/33 28 64 43.75 1 CAROL WILKINSON L 28/43 20 60 33.33 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 252 606 41.58 3 NORMA BISCHOFF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 VIVIAN FENDLE W 43/28 28 64 43.75 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 44/29 21 44 47.72 4 CINDY HELGESON W 41/39 33 68 48.52 1 CAROL WILKINSON L 6/43 14 40 35.00 2 RUBY MILLER L 24/40 22 56 39.28 5 VIVIAN FENDLE W 41/29 25 58 43.10 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 41/28 22 48 45.83 4 CINDY HELGESON W 41/28 30 56 53.57 1 CAROL WILKINSON W 45/33 25 56 44.64 2 RUBY MILLER L 33/41 18 50 36.00 2 RUBY MILLER L 33/41 24 64 37.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 43%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 262 604 43.37 4 CINDY HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CAROL WILKINSON L 27/42 16 42 38.09 2 RUBY MILLER W 43/18 21 38 55.26 3 NORMA BISCHOFF L 39/41 33 68 48.52 6 YVONNE GREAVES L 30/41 20 50 40.00 5 VIVIAN FENDLE W 44/36 23 54 42.59 1 CAROL WILKINSON W 43/38 20 48 41.66 2 RUBY MILLER W 41/32 23 50 46.00 3 NORMA BISCHOFF L 28/41 27 56 48.21 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 43/11 20 36 55.55 5 VIVIAN FENDLE W 41/30 28 54 51.85 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 45%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 231 496 46.57 5 VIVIAN FENDLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 NORMA BISCHOFF L 28/43 24 64 37.50 1 CAROL WILKINSON L 13/44 16 38 42.10 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 40/2 17 26 65.38 2 RUBY MILLER L 29/40 20 56 35.71 4 CINDY HELGESON L 36/44 20 54 37.03 3 NORMA BISCHOFF L 29/41 22 58 37.93 1 CAROL WILKINSON L 30/40 30 62 48.38 6 YVONNE GREAVES W 45/19 26 50 52.00 2 RUBY MILLER L 34/40 24 56 42.85 4 CINDY HELGESON L 30/41 22 54 40.74 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 44%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 221 518 42.66 6 YVONNE GREAVES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 RUBY MILLER L 27/42 24 58 41.37 3 NORMA BISCHOFF L 29/44 15 44 34.09 5 VIVIAN FENDLE L 2/40 7 26 26.92 4 CINDY HELGESON W 41/30 24 50 48.00 1 CAROL WILKINSON L 28/42 16 50 32.00 2 RUBY MILLER L 18/45 12 42 28.57 3 NORMA BISCHOFF L 28/41 16 48 33.33 5 VIVIAN FENDLE L 19/45 17 50 34.00 4 CINDY HELGESON L 11/43 10 36 27.77 1 CAROL WILKINSON L 12/41 8 34 23.52 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 46%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 149 438 34.01 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 WOMEN - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# VERNA WEINGARDT BC 9778 7 4 343 185 484 38.22% 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS BC 0883 6 5 327 178 456 39.03% 3* ELAINE RUSH BC 3881 5 5 295 172 410 41.95% 4* ROSE THOMAS BC 0623 5 5 302 164 434 37.78% 5* LORRAINE HUBICK BC 0881 5 5 273 151 426 35.44% 6 YVONNE HELLYER BC 3420 3 7 251 164 458 35.80% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# VERNA WEINGARDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 YVONNE HELLYER W 36/22 15 44 34.09 5 LORRAINE HUBICK W 36/12 14 28 50.00 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS L 32/37 22 50 44.00 3 ELAINE RUSH W 35/32 19 50 38.00 4 ROSE THOMAS L 19/37 16 52 30.76 6 YVONNE HELLYER L 34/35 16 50 32.00 5 LORRAINE HUBICK W 35/28 22 54 40.74 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS L 2/36 3 24 12.50 3 ELAINE RUSH W 36/25 21 52 40.38 4 ROSE THOMAS W 38/26 17 36 47.22 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS W 40/25 20 44 45.45 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 185 484 38.22 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ROSE THOMAS L 25/37 13 44 29.54 3 ELAINE RUSH L 25/37 19 52 36.53 1 VERNA WEINGARDT W 37/32 27 50 54.00 6 YVONNE HELLYER W 36/27 24 52 46.15 5 LORRAINE HUBICK L 22/37 8 44 18.18 4 ROSE THOMAS W 37/14 14 32 43.75 3 ELAINE RUSH L 12/35 9 32 28.12 1 VERNA WEINGARDT W 36/2 13 24 54.16 6 YVONNE HELLYER W 35/18 15 36 41.66 5 LORRAINE HUBICK W 37/26 21 46 45.65 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 25/40 15 44 34.09 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 6 L 5 178 456 39.03 3* ELAINE RUSH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LORRAINE HUBICK W 35/11 14 30 46.66 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS W 37/25 23 52 44.23 4 ROSE THOMAS W 39/19 26 42 61.90 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 32/35 20 50 40.00 6 YVONNE HELLYER W 38/15 17 34 50.00 5 LORRAINE HUBICK L 4/36 3 26 11.53 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS W 35/12 17 32 53.12 4 ROSE THOMAS L 28/37 16 44 36.36 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 25/36 22 52 42.30 6 YVONNE HELLYER L 22/37 14 48 29.16 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 40%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 172 410 41.95 4* ROSE THOMAS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS W 37/25 16 44 36.36 6 YVONNE HELLYER W 35/20 15 36 41.66 3 ELAINE RUSH L 19/39 19 42 45.23 5 LORRAINE HUBICK W 37/15 21 44 47.72 1 VERNA WEINGARDT W 37/19 23 52 44.23 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS L 14/37 8 32 25.00 6 YVONNE HELLYER L 26/37 13 54 24.07 3 ELAINE RUSH W 37/28 18 44 40.90 5 LORRAINE HUBICK L 34/35 18 50 36.00 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 26/38 13 36 36.11 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 164 434 37.78 5* LORRAINE HUBICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ELAINE RUSH L 11/35 6 30 20.00 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 12/36 7 28 25.00 6 YVONNE HELLYER W 37/16 20 48 41.66 4 ROSE THOMAS L 15/37 15 44 34.09 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS W 37/22 12 44 27.27 3 ELAINE RUSH W 36/4 12 26 46.15 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 28/35 20 54 37.03 6 YVONNE HELLYER W 36/24 25 56 44.64 4 ROSE THOMAS W 35/34 17 50 34.00 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS L 26/37 17 46 36.95 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 35%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 151 426 35.44 6 YVONNE HELLYER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 22/36 15 44 34.09 4 ROSE THOMAS L 20/35 11 36 30.55 5 LORRAINE HUBICK L 16/37 15 48 31.25 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS L 27/36 23 52 44.23 3 ELAINE RUSH L 15/38 11 34 32.35 1 VERNA WEINGARDT W 35/34 18 50 36.00 4 ROSE THOMAS W 37/26 18 54 33.33 5 LORRAINE HUBICK L 24/36 23 56 41.07 2 CAROL SKRODOLIS L 18/35 11 36 30.55 3 ELAINE RUSH W 37/22 19 48 39.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 164 458 35.80 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 WOMEN - CLASS D (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CAROL PERRY BC 3407 9 1 299 123 380 32.36% 2 SUSAN MACDONALD BC 4084 7 3 295 88 384 22.91% 3* CHERYL BRIETKOPF BC 0649 5 5 242 87 378 23.01% 4* NORAH SCHOLEFIELD BC 2879 5 5 213 66 384 17.18% 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS BC 3160 4 6 265 89 430 20.69% 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN BC 9803 0 10 103 38 348 10.91% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CAROL PERRY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 SUSAN MACDONALD W 31/21 13 40 32.50 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD W 31/12 15 44 34.09 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 31/22 11 48 22.91 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 31/14 12 30 40.00 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 31/13 12 32 37.50 2 SUSAN MACDONALD W 32/28 12 38 31.57 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD L 18/32 11 40 27.50 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 31/3 9 28 32.14 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 32/19 16 42 38.09 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 31/19 12 38 31.57 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 123 380 32.36 2 SUSAN MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CAROL PERRY L 21/31 10 40 25.00 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 30/18 12 40 30.00 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 30/25 9 40 22.50 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 34/19 11 30 36.66 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD W 31/2 11 26 42.30 1 CAROL PERRY L 28/32 9 38 23.68 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 31/13 5 40 12.50 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 26/32 8 54 14.81 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 34/24 6 48 12.50 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD W 30/2 7 28 25.00 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 88 384 22.91 3* CHERYL BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 30/10 12 32 37.50 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 31/29 12 62 19.35 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD W 30/21 9 48 18.75 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 19/34 7 30 23.33 1 CAROL PERRY L 13/31 7 32 21.87 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 32/0 9 22 40.90 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 12/31 7 28 25.00 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD W 32/18 11 38 28.94 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 24/34 6 48 12.50 1 CAROL PERRY L 19/31 7 38 18.42 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 87 378 23.01 4* NORAH SCHOLEFIELD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 32/28 13 48 27.08 1 CAROL PERRY L 12/31 8 44 18.18 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 21/30 6 48 12.50 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 31/0 4 32 12.50 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 2/31 3 26 11.53 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 31/26 6 50 12.00 1 CAROL PERRY W 32/18 13 40 32.50 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 18/32 5 38 13.15 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 32/2 7 30 23.33 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 2/30 1 28 3.57 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 66 384 17.18 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD L 28/32 10 48 20.83 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 29/31 7 62 11.29 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 25/30 10 40 25.00 1 CAROL PERRY L 14/31 7 30 23.33 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 31/13 7 34 20.58 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD L 26/31 7 50 14.00 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 31/12 13 28 46.42 2 SUSAN MACDONALD W 32/26 10 54 18.51 1 CAROL PERRY L 19/32 11 42 26.19 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 30/22 7 42 16.66 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 89 430 20.69 6 SYLVIANNE MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 10/30 6 32 18.75 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 18/30 10 40 25.00 1 CAROL PERRY L 22/31 8 48 16.66 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD L 0/31 0 32 None 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 13/31 3 34 8.82 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 0/32 1 22 4.54 2 SUSAN MACDONALD L 13/31 5 40 12.50 1 CAROL PERRY L 3/31 0 28 None 4 NORA SCHOLEFIELD L 2/32 0 30 None 5 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 22/30 5 42 11.90 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 38 348 10.91 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 WOMEN - CLASS E (25Pts/40Sh) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 PAULINE TUTTLE BC 1312 8 0 219 59 254 23.22% 2 ANNETTE HUGHES BC 1807 6 2 180 53 272 19.48% 3 MARLENE GARNER BC 1808 4 4 135 32 266 12.03% 4 FAITH JUELL BC 1157 2 6 130 40 278 14.38% 5 SUE HELGESON BC 0000 0 8 28 3 234 1.28% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 PAULINE TUTTLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ANNETTE HUGHES W 31/23 5 44 11.36 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 27/6 5 32 15.62 3 MARLENE GARNER W 27/4 9 28 32.14 4 FAITH JUELL W 28/7 9 36 25.00 2 ANNETTE HUGHES W 26/10 8 34 23.52 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 27/1 8 18 44.44 3 MARLENE GARNER W 27/7 6 28 21.42 4 FAITH JUELL W 26/13 9 34 26.47 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 8 L 0 59 254 23.22 2 ANNETTE HUGHES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 PAULINE TUTTLE L 23/31 5 44 11.36 4 FAITH JUELL W 17/12 8 40 20.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 26/4 6 34 17.64 3 MARLENE GARNER W 25/19 7 34 20.58 1 PAULINE TUTTLE L 10/26 4 34 11.76 4 FAITH JUELL W 25/4 6 22 27.27 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 28/4 7 26 26.92 3 MARLENE GARNER W 26/12 10 38 26.31 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 6 L 2 53 272 19.48 3 MARLENE GARNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 25/0 5 18 27.77 4 FAITH JUELL W 25/24 7 40 17.50 1 PAULINE TUTTLE L 4/27 1 28 3.57 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 19/25 4 34 11.76 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 SUE HELGESON W 21/5 1 40 2.50 4 FAITH JUELL W 22/20 7 40 17.50 1 PAULINE TUTTLE L 7/27 1 28 3.57 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 12/26 6 38 15.78 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 4 L 4 32 266 12.03 4 FAITH JUELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 SUE HELGESON W 25/3 4 34 11.76 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 12/17 7 40 17.50 3 MARLENE GARNER L 24/25 7 40 17.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 PAULINE TUTTLE L 7/28 4 36 11.11 5 SUE HELGESON W 25/5 5 32 15.62 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 4/25 1 22 4.54 3 MARLENE GARNER L 20/22 7 40 17.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 PAULINE TUTTLE L 13/26 5 34 14.70 (Was 12%) TOTALS W 2 L 6 40 278 14.38 5 SUE HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 FAITH JUELL L 3/25 1 34 2.94 3 MARLENE GARNER L 0/25 0 18 None 1 PAULINE TUTTLE L 6/27 1 32 3.12 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 4/26 0 34 None - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 FAITH JUELL L 5/25 0 32 None 3 MARLENE GARNER L 5/21 1 40 2.50 1 PAULINE TUTTLE L 1/27 0 18 None 2 ANNETTE HUGHES L 4/28 0 26 None - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 2%) TOTALS W 0 L 8 3 234 1.28 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 NEIL YASKOW BC 3136 8 2 386 289 488 59.22% 2 WILF GREGORY BC 3293 7 3 354 264 456 57.89% 3 MURRAY RAYNER BC 4856 6 4 321 227 440 51.59% 4 GORDON SNYDER BC 0460 5 5 342 273 524 52.09% 5 MEL MCCLELLAND BC 4769 4 6 188 147 404 36.38% 6 Kevin Cuthbert {Pacer} 4135 0 10 337 276 516 53.48% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 NEIL YASKOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 40/38 44 72 61.11 4 GORDON SNYDER L 28/40 37 66 56.06 5 MEL MCCLELLAND W 40/28 26 48 54.16 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 42/19 18 30 60.00 2 WILF GREGORY W 41/17 25 40 62.50 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 35/40 35 58 60.34 4 GORDON SNYDER W 40/17 28 46 60.86 5 MEL MCCLELLAND W 41/0 15 18 83.33 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 45/37 33 58 56.89 2 WILF GREGORY L 34/42 28 52 53.84 (Was 61%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 289 488 59.22 2 WILF GREGORY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/12 19 32 59.37 5 MEL MCCLELLAND L 30/41 29 60 48.33 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 25/40 24 48 50.00 4 GORDON SNYDER L 34/40 24 44 54.54 1 NEIL YASKOW L 17/41 17 40 42.50 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 42/5 26 38 68.42 5 MEL MCCLELLAND W 41/10 19 30 63.33 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 42/31 31 50 62.00 4 GORDON SNYDER W 41/24 45 62 72.58 1 NEIL YASKOW W 42/34 30 52 57.69 (Was 63%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 264 456 57.89 3 MURRAY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 WILF GREGORY L 12/40 9 32 28.12 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 41/28 24 44 54.54 4 GORDON SNYDER W 40/24 25 44 56.81 1 NEIL YASKOW L 19/42 11 30 36.66 5 MEL MCCLELLAND W 41/25 29 52 55.76 2 WILF GREGORY L 5/42 15 38 39.47 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 44/17 30 48 62.50 4 GORDON SNYDER W 40/39 32 64 50.00 1 NEIL YASKOW L 37/45 30 58 51.72 5 MEL MCCLELLAND W 42/5 22 30 73.33 (Was 62%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 227 440 51.59 4 GORDON SNYDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 MEL MCCLELLAND L 37/40 23 54 42.59 1 NEIL YASKOW W 40/28 40 66 60.60 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 24/40 19 44 43.18 2 WILF GREGORY W 40/34 26 44 59.09 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 41/18 25 46 54.34 5 MEL MCCLELLAND W 40/4 16 30 53.33 1 NEIL YASKOW L 17/40 21 46 45.65 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 39/40 30 64 46.87 2 WILF GREGORY L 24/41 39 62 62.90 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 40/38 34 68 50.00 (Was 52%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 273 524 52.09 5 MEL MCCLELLAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 GORDON SNYDER W 40/37 24 54 44.44 2 WILF GREGORY W 41/30 31 60 51.66 1 NEIL YASKOW L 28/40 22 48 45.83 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 27/42 14 54 25.92 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 25/41 23 52 44.23 4 GORDON SNYDER L 4/40 4 30 13.33 2 WILF GREGORY L 10/41 10 30 33.33 1 NEIL YASKOW L 0/41 2 18 11.11 6 Kevin Cuthbert W 8/45 7 28 25.00 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 5/42 10 30 33.33 (Was 52%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 147 404 36.38 6 Kevin Cuthbert - {Pacer} OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 NEIL YASKOW L 38/40 42 72 58.33 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 28/41 20 44 45.45 2 WILF GREGORY L 40/25 30 48 62.50 5 MEL MCCLELLAND L 42/27 22 54 40.74 4 GORDON SNYDER L 18/41 19 46 41.30 1 NEIL YASKOW L 40/35 37 58 63.79 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 17/44 22 48 45.83 2 WILF GREGORY L 31/42 27 50 54.00 5 MEL MCCLELLAND L 45/8 20 28 71.42 4 GORDON SNYDER L 38/40 37 68 54.41 (PACER) TOTALS W 0 L 10 276 516 53.48 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ERNIE CONNOLLY BC 1502 9 2 437 283 564 50.17% 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO BC 9758 8 3 424 303 594 51.01% 3* JERRY HARACH BC 1751 4 6 297 236 498 47.38% 4* OSCAR HOYSETH BC 3171 4 6 311 211 488 43.23% 5** JOHN THORNTON BC 0678 3 7 347 267 568 47.00% 6** JOHN COLLIN BC 0199 3 7 315 226 552 40.94% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ERNIE CONNOLLY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JERRY HARACH W 44/39 31 62 50.00 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 40/17 23 44 52.27 6 JOHN COLLIN W 43/29 28 54 51.85 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 28/44 29 60 48.33 5 JOHN THORNTON W 40/39 31 64 48.43 3 JERRY HARACH W 42/3 23 32 71.87 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 42/28 17 34 50.00 6 JOHN COLLIN W 41/24 21 50 42.00 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 35/40 35 72 48.61 5 JOHN THORNTON W 42/27 20 44 45.45 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 40/28 25 48 52.08 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 9 L 2 283 564 50.17 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOHN COLLIN L 29/41 30 72 41.66 5 JOHN THORNTON W 41/39 29 64 45.31 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 29/42 24 44 54.54 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 44/28 36 60 60.00 3 JERRY HARACH W 44/39 34 66 51.51 6 JOHN COLLIN W 41/33 24 54 44.44 5 JOHN THORNTON W 43/32 19 42 45.23 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 42/15 23 40 57.50 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/35 37 72 51.38 3 JERRY HARACH W 43/4 26 32 81.25 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 28/40 21 48 43.75 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 303 594 51.01 3* JERRY HARACH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 39/44 29 62 46.77 6 JOHN COLLIN W 42/21 26 52 50.00 5 JOHN THORNTON L 23/41 29 54 53.70 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 19/44 16 52 30.76 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 39/44 32 66 48.48 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 3/42 11 32 34.37 6 JOHN COLLIN W 43/27 24 50 48.00 5 JOHN THORNTON W 42/39 30 56 53.57 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 43/19 26 42 61.90 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 4/43 13 32 40.62 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 46%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 236 498 47.38 4* OSCAR HOYSETH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JOHN THORNTON W 41/26 24 50 48.00 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 17/40 15 44 34.09 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 42/29 28 44 63.63 3 JERRY HARACH W 44/19 23 52 44.23 6 JOHN COLLIN L 27/41 24 60 40.00 5 JOHN THORNTON L 38/41 37 78 47.43 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 28/42 13 34 38.23 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 15/42 13 40 32.50 3 JERRY HARACH L 19/43 16 42 38.09 6 JOHN COLLIN W 40/23 18 44 40.90 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 49%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 211 488 43.23 5** JOHN THORNTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 26/41 21 50 42.00 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 39/41 29 64 45.31 3 JERRY HARACH W 41/23 34 54 62.96 6 JOHN COLLIN L 21/40 24 52 46.15 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 39/40 32 64 50.00 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 41/38 39 78 50.00 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 32/43 16 42 38.09 3 JERRY HARACH L 39/42 29 56 51.78 6 JOHN COLLIN W 42/36 29 64 45.31 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 27/42 14 44 31.81 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 48%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 267 568 47.00 6** JOHN COLLIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 41/29 33 72 45.83 3 JERRY HARACH L 21/42 18 52 34.61 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 29/43 25 54 46.29 5 JOHN THORNTON W 40/21 31 52 59.61 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 41/27 28 60 46.66 2 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 33/41 20 54 37.03 3 JERRY HARACH L 27/43 15 50 30.00 1 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 24/41 15 50 30.00 5 JOHN THORNTON L 36/42 27 64 42.18 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 23/40 14 44 31.81 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 49%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 226 552 40.94 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# KEN MOUNT BC 1145 7 4 351 191 568 33.62% 2 EARLE GILLARD BC 4212 6 5 341 152 530 28.67% 3* CLARENCE JUELL BC 4846 5 5 311 185 492 37.60% 4* CLIFF BROSNIKOFF BC 9760 5 5 289 156 448 34.82% 5* ALBERT ROCHON BC 0282 5 5 300 155 456 33.99% 6 TED KUPFERSHMID BC 0507 3 7 284 154 462 33.33% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# KEN MOUNT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CLARENCE JUELL L 24/36 10 46 21.73 2 EARLE GILLARD L 25/35 15 46 32.60 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/28 16 52 30.76 5 ALBERT ROCHON W 37/22 18 52 34.61 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF W 35/30 17 52 32.69 3 CLARENCE JUELL W 35/30 22 70 31.42 2 EARLE GILLARD L 19/36 9 36 25.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 36/24 25 54 46.29 5 ALBERT ROCHON W 36/32 20 52 38.46 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF L 33/40 22 58 37.93 2 EARLE GILLARD W 36/29 17 50 34.00 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 191 568 33.62 2 EARLE GILLARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/21 17 56 30.35 1 KEN MOUNT W 35/25 17 46 36.95 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF W 35/28 12 54 22.22 3 CLARENCE JUELL W 36/27 15 54 27.77 5 ALBERT ROCHON W 37/21 16 48 33.33 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 29/39 15 48 31.25 1 KEN MOUNT W 36/19 11 36 30.55 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF L 28/40 14 48 29.16 3 CLARENCE JUELL L 21/36 13 48 27.08 5 ALBERT ROCHON L 18/35 11 42 26.19 1 KEN MOUNT L 29/36 11 50 22.00 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 6 L 5 152 530 28.67 3* CLARENCE JUELL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 KEN MOUNT W 36/24 16 46 34.78 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF W 36/3 14 30 46.66 5 ALBERT ROCHON L 29/38 24 50 48.00 2 EARLE GILLARD L 27/36 15 54 27.77 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/24 18 46 39.13 1 KEN MOUNT L 30/35 23 70 32.85 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF L 22/35 16 50 32.00 5 ALBERT ROCHON W 35/33 19 50 38.00 2 EARLE GILLARD W 36/21 21 48 43.75 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 25/37 19 48 39.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 44%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 185 492 37.60 4* CLIFF BROSNIKOFF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ALBERT ROCHON L 7/35 6 28 21.42 3 CLARENCE JUELL L 3/36 3 30 10.00 2 EARLE GILLARD L 28/35 13 54 24.07 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/23 15 36 41.66 1 KEN MOUNT L 30/35 14 52 26.92 5 ALBERT ROCHON L 34/36 23 52 44.23 3 CLARENCE JUELL W 35/22 20 50 40.00 2 EARLE GILLARD W 40/28 20 48 41.66 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/17 20 40 50.00 1 KEN MOUNT W 40/33 22 58 37.93 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 156 448 34.82 5* ALBERT ROCHON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF W 35/7 13 28 46.42 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 12/39 6 30 20.00 3 CLARENCE JUELL W 38/29 26 50 52.00 1 KEN MOUNT L 22/37 10 52 19.23 2 EARLE GILLARD L 21/37 13 48 27.08 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF W 36/34 23 52 44.23 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 36/32 18 52 34.61 3 CLARENCE JUELL L 33/35 16 50 32.00 1 KEN MOUNT L 32/36 15 52 28.84 2 EARLE GILLARD W 35/18 15 42 35.71 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 38%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 155 456 33.99 6 TED KUPFERSHMID - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 EARLE GILLARD L 21/37 14 56 25.00 5 ALBERT ROCHON W 39/12 16 30 53.33 1 KEN MOUNT L 28/35 11 52 21.15 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF L 23/37 9 36 25.00 3 CLARENCE JUELL L 24/35 13 46 28.26 2 EARLE GILLARD W 39/29 20 48 41.66 5 ALBERT ROCHON L 32/36 17 52 32.69 1 KEN MOUNT L 24/36 20 54 37.03 4 CLIFF BROSNIKOFF L 17/35 14 40 35.00 3 CLARENCE JUELL W 37/25 20 48 41.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 43%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 154 462 33.33 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS D (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# TED PETERS BC 4811 8 3 287 125 412 30.33% 2 GARRY RAYNER BC 0740 7 4 289 128 426 30.04% 3 LARRY GREGOIRE BC 3423 6 4 260 110 338 32.54% 4* DICK HOPKINS BC 3159 5 5 258 145 420 34.52% 5* JOE BELANGER BC 1752 5 5 249 112 344 32.55% 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN BC 0554 0 10 140 69 368 18.75% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# TED PETERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 GARRY RAYNER W 30/18 16 48 33.33 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 32/22 13 42 30.95 5 JOE BELANGER L 10/31 7 30 23.33 3 LARRY GREGOIRE L 10/30 6 22 27.27 4 DICK HOPKINS W 30/12 8 28 28.57 2 GARRY RAYNER L 15/30 9 42 21.42 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 33/9 10 40 25.00 5 JOE BELANGER W 32/26 14 44 31.81 3 LARRY GREGOIRE W 31/16 12 24 50.00 4 DICK HOPKINS W 32/19 16 54 29.62 2 GARRY RAYNER W 32/16 14 38 36.84 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 125 412 30.33 2 GARRY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TED PETERS L 18/30 12 48 25.00 3 LARRY GREGOIRE L 22/30 9 36 25.00 4 DICK HOPKINS L 14/31 12 34 35.29 5 JOE BELANGER W 30/12 12 32 37.50 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 30/14 9 36 25.00 1 TED PETERS W 30/15 14 42 33.33 3 LARRY GREGOIRE W 34/22 13 44 29.54 4 DICK HOPKINS W 33/29 16 50 32.00 5 JOE BELANGER W 30/21 12 32 37.50 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 32/19 10 34 29.41 1 TED PETERS L 16/32 9 38 23.68 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 128 426 30.04 3 LARRY GREGOIRE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DICK HOPKINS L 27/31 12 46 26.08 2 GARRY RAYNER W 30/22 13 36 36.11 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 31/12 13 38 34.21 1 TED PETERS W 30/10 13 22 59.09 5 JOE BELANGER W 31/7 13 26 50.00 4 DICK HOPKINS W 32/18 13 42 30.95 2 GARRY RAYNER L 22/34 10 44 22.72 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 35/14 11 36 30.55 1 TED PETERS L 16/31 8 24 33.33 5 JOE BELANGER L 6/32 4 24 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 110 338 32.54 4* DICK HOPKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 LARRY GREGOIRE W 31/27 16 46 34.78 5 JOE BELANGER L 22/31 14 44 31.81 2 GARRY RAYNER W 31/14 20 34 58.82 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 32/21 12 44 27.27 1 TED PETERS L 12/30 4 28 14.28 3 LARRY GREGOIRE L 18/32 10 42 23.80 5 JOE BELANGER W 33/27 17 46 36.95 2 GARRY RAYNER L 29/33 20 50 40.00 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 31/6 16 32 50.00 1 TED PETERS L 19/32 16 54 29.62 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 145 420 34.52 5* JOE BELANGER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 31/14 10 34 29.41 4 DICK HOPKINS W 31/22 13 44 29.54 1 TED PETERS W 31/10 14 30 46.66 2 GARRY RAYNER L 12/30 8 32 25.00 3 LARRY GREGOIRE L 7/31 6 26 23.07 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 31/9 11 32 34.37 4 DICK HOPKINS L 27/33 16 46 34.78 1 TED PETERS L 26/32 14 44 31.81 2 GARRY RAYNER L 21/30 9 32 28.12 3 LARRY GREGOIRE W 32/6 11 24 45.83 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 112 344 32.55 6 ARDEN WEIDMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JOE BELANGER L 14/31 4 34 11.76 1 TED PETERS L 22/32 10 42 23.80 3 LARRY GREGOIRE L 12/31 8 38 21.05 4 DICK HOPKINS L 21/32 6 44 13.63 2 GARRY RAYNER L 14/30 5 36 13.88 5 JOE BELANGER L 9/31 6 32 18.75 1 TED PETERS L 9/33 7 40 17.50 3 LARRY GREGOIRE L 14/35 6 36 16.66 4 DICK HOPKINS L 6/31 8 32 25.00 2 GARRY RAYNER L 19/32 9 34 26.47 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 30%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 69 368 18.75 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS E (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ROGER HELGESON BC 1812 8 2 273 100 388 25.77% 2 LEWIS BEETON BC 1106 7 3 281 90 368 24.45% 3 MARCEL PINETTE BC 4210 6 4 261 88 402 21.89% 4 ED MORIGEAU BC 0800 5 5 274 99 422 23.45% 5 NORM WEBSTER BC 1294 4 6 223 77 396 19.44% 6 BUD PERRY BC 3406 0 10 146 58 396 14.64% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ROGER HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LEWIS BEETON W 31/17 9 36 25.00 3 MARCEL PINETTE W 31/21 10 46 21.73 5 NORM WEBSTER W 30/13 9 34 26.47 4 ED MORIGEAU W 31/26 13 52 25.00 6 BUD PERRY W 33/11 12 36 33.33 2 LEWIS BEETON L 9/31 4 30 13.33 3 MARCEL PINETTE W 32/19 13 36 36.11 5 NORM WEBSTER L 15/33 6 38 15.78 4 ED MORIGEAU W 31/21 14 48 29.16 6 BUD PERRY W 30/20 10 32 31.25 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 100 388 25.77 2 LEWIS BEETON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ROGER HELGESON L 17/31 5 36 13.88 5 NORM WEBSTER W 30/12 10 28 35.71 4 ED MORIGEAU W 31/29 14 44 31.81 6 BUD PERRY W 31/22 8 48 16.66 3 MARCEL PINETTE W 30/17 8 38 21.05 1 ROGER HELGESON W 31/9 10 30 33.33 5 NORM WEBSTER W 31/21 9 44 20.45 4 ED MORIGEAU L 25/30 10 42 23.80 6 BUD PERRY W 31/2 8 26 30.76 3 MARCEL PINETTE L 24/32 8 32 25.00 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 90 368 24.45 3 MARCEL PINETTE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ED MORIGEAU L 14/32 6 38 15.78 1 ROGER HELGESON L 21/31 8 46 17.39 6 BUD PERRY W 33/5 9 40 22.50 5 NORM WEBSTER W 31/28 11 48 22.91 2 LEWIS BEETON L 17/30 6 38 15.78 4 ED MORIGEAU W 31/23 11 44 25.00 1 ROGER HELGESON L 19/32 8 36 22.22 6 BUD PERRY W 30/7 7 32 21.87 5 NORM WEBSTER W 33/17 12 48 25.00 2 LEWIS BEETON W 32/24 10 32 31.25 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 88 402 21.89 4 ED MORIGEAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MARCEL PINETTE W 32/14 11 38 28.94 6 BUD PERRY W 30/26 8 46 17.39 2 LEWIS BEETON L 29/31 14 44 31.81 1 ROGER HELGESON L 26/31 8 52 15.38 5 NORM WEBSTER W 30/4 10 26 38.46 3 MARCEL PINETTE L 23/31 8 44 18.18 6 BUD PERRY W 33/15 11 44 25.00 2 LEWIS BEETON W 30/25 12 42 28.57 1 ROGER HELGESON L 21/31 8 48 16.66 5 NORM WEBSTER L 20/35 9 38 23.68 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 99 422 23.45 5 NORM WEBSTER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 BUD PERRY W 30/9 9 38 23.68 2 LEWIS BEETON L 12/30 4 28 14.28 1 ROGER HELGESON L 13/30 3 34 8.82 3 MARCEL PINETTE L 28/31 8 48 16.66 4 ED MORIGEAU L 4/30 4 26 15.38 6 BUD PERRY W 30/29 10 54 18.51 2 LEWIS BEETON L 21/31 7 44 15.90 1 ROGER HELGESON W 33/15 13 38 34.21 3 MARCEL PINETTE L 17/33 6 48 12.50 4 ED MORIGEAU W 35/20 13 38 34.21 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 77 396 19.44 6 BUD PERRY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 NORM WEBSTER L 9/30 5 38 13.15 4 ED MORIGEAU L 26/30 9 46 19.56 3 MARCEL PINETTE L 5/33 2 40 5.00 2 LEWIS BEETON L 22/31 6 48 12.50 1 ROGER HELGESON L 11/33 6 36 16.66 5 NORM WEBSTER L 29/30 10 54 18.51 4 ED MORIGEAU L 15/33 8 44 18.18 3 MARCEL PINETTE L 7/30 4 32 12.50 2 LEWIS BEETON L 2/31 1 26 3.84 1 ROGER HELGESON L 20/30 7 32 21.87 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 58 396 14.64 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS F (25Pts/40Sh) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CLIFF BAILEY BC 0118 5 1 150 51 212 24.05% 2 BUD HALLOCK BC 3283 4 2 142 48 216 22.22% 3 DOUG TUTTLE BC 1313 0 6 71 16 200 8.00% 4 KEN GREEN Withdrew 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CLIFF BAILEY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DOUG TUTTLE W 25/6 5 34 14.70 - - - B Y E - - - - 1/- -- -- ----- 2 BUD HALLOCK W 25/20 9 36 25.00 3 DOUG TUTTLE W 28/15 8 30 26.66 - - - B Y E - - - - 1/- -- -- ----- 2 BUD HALLOCK L 20/21 16 40 40.00 3 DOUG TUTTLE W 25/10 7 34 20.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 BUD HALLOCK W 25/20 6 38 15.78 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 5 L 1 51 212 24.05 2 BUD HALLOCK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - 1/- -- -- ----- 3 DOUG TUTTLE W 28/12 7 38 18.42 1 CLIFF BAILEY L 20/25 7 36 19.44 - - - B Y E - - - - 1/- -- -- ----- 3 DOUG TUTTLE W 26/9 7 28 25.00 1 CLIFF BAILEY W 21/20 15 40 37.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 DOUG TUTTLE W 25/17 7 36 19.44 1 CLIFF BAILEY L 20/25 5 38 13.15 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 4 L 2 48 216 22.22 3 DOUG TUTTLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CLIFF BAILEY L 6/25 1 34 2.94 2 BUD HALLOCK L 12/28 3 38 7.89 - - - B Y E - - - - 1/- -- -- ----- 1 CLIFF BAILEY L 15/28 5 30 16.66 2 BUD HALLOCK L 9/26 2 28 7.14 - - - B Y E - - - - 1/- -- -- ----- 1 CLIFF BAILEY L 10/25 2 34 5.88 2 BUD HALLOCK L 17/25 3 36 8.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 6%) TOTALS W 0 L 6 16 200 8.00 This Class Pitched on Day 1 Shift 1 and Day 2 Shift 1 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 JUNIORS - CLASS A (25Pts/40Sh) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SAM DEGRAAF BC 1467 6 1 172 56 246 22.76% 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF BC 1468 1 6 68 20 246 8.13% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SAM DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 30/6 11 34 32.35 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 26/10 9 24 37.50 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF L 11/17 3 40 7.50 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 27/5 6 38 15.78 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 24/14 9 40 22.50 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 27/5 9 36 25.00 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF W 27/11 9 34 26.47 (Was 15%) TOTALS W 6 L 1 56 246 22.76 2 JESSICA DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SAM DEGRAAF L 6/30 2 34 5.88 1 SAM DEGRAAF L 10/26 3 24 12.50 1 SAM DEGRAAF W 17/11 3 40 7.50 1 SAM DEGRAAF L 5/27 0 38 None 1 SAM DEGRAAF L 14/24 6 40 15.00 1 SAM DEGRAAF L 5/27 3 36 8.33 1 SAM DEGRAAF L 11/27 3 34 8.82 (Was 8%) TOTALS W 1 L 6 20 246 8.13 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 MEN - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TONY RONDOW BC 0600 8 0 333 213 378 56.34% 2 JIM BALL BC 3443 5 3 287 185 426 43.42% 3 WALTER KINAKIN BC 0744 4 4 291 185 410 45.12% 4 ROY DAWE BC 2807 3 5 225 152 394 38.57% 5 FRED ORMISTON BC 3946 0 8 170 108 360 30.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TONY RONDOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - 1/- -- -- ----- 4 ROY DAWE W 41/27 27 50 54.00 5 FRED ORMISTON W 42/7 21 32 65.62 2 JIM BALL W 40/23 27 54 50.00 3 WALTER KINAKIN W 42/27 33 68 48.52 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 ROY DAWE W 42/16 25 44 56.81 5 FRED ORMISTON W 40/9 23 38 60.52 2 JIM BALL W 42/20 25 36 69.44 3 WALTER KINAKIN W 43/22 32 56 57.14 (Was 63%) TOTALS W 8 L 0 213 378 56.34 2 JIM BALL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 WALTER KINAKIN W 42/39 26 66 39.39 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 ROY DAWE W 42/28 29 58 50.00 1 TONY RONDOW L 23/40 22 54 40.74 5 FRED ORMISTON W 42/17 14 46 30.43 3 WALTER KINAKIN W 41/35 31 60 51.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 ROY DAWE L 35/42 25 56 44.64 1 TONY RONDOW L 20/42 17 36 47.22 5 FRED ORMISTON W 42/27 21 50 42.00 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 5 L 3 185 426 43.42 3 WALTER KINAKIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JIM BALL L 39/42 25 66 37.87 5 FRED ORMISTON W 42/30 16 48 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 ROY DAWE W 45/7 19 34 55.88 1 TONY RONDOW L 27/42 30 68 44.11 2 JIM BALL L 35/41 30 60 50.00 5 FRED ORMISTON W 41/11 21 36 58.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 ROY DAWE W 40/24 19 42 45.23 1 TONY RONDOW L 22/43 25 56 44.64 (Was 55%) TOTALS W 4 L 4 185 410 45.12 4 ROY DAWE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 FRED ORMISTON W 40/30 19 54 35.18 1 TONY RONDOW L 27/41 20 50 40.00 2 JIM BALL L 28/42 22 58 37.93 3 WALTER KINAKIN L 7/45 8 34 23.52 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 FRED ORMISTON W 41/39 25 56 44.64 1 TONY RONDOW L 16/42 18 44 40.90 2 JIM BALL W 42/35 26 56 46.42 3 WALTER KINAKIN L 24/40 14 42 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 42%) TOTALS W 3 L 5 152 394 38.57 5 FRED ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ROY DAWE L 30/40 17 54 31.48 3 WALTER KINAKIN L 30/42 12 48 25.00 1 TONY RONDOW L 7/42 9 32 28.12 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 JIM BALL L 17/42 7 46 15.21 4 ROY DAWE L 39/41 23 56 41.07 3 WALTER KINAKIN L 11/41 12 36 33.33 1 TONY RONDOW L 9/40 12 38 31.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 JIM BALL L 27/42 16 50 32.00 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 0 L 8 108 360 30.00 This Class Pitched on Day 1 Shift 2 and Day 2 Shift 3 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 MEN - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# AL GUSHTA BC 1504 8 2 389 208 516 40.31% 2 RON DENMAN BC 0599 7 3 345 184 440 41.81% 3* ROBIN DEGRAAF BC 0061 6 3 321 180 464 38.79% 4* DALE WALCH BC 1103 6 3 335 156 458 34.06% 5 LOU BUSCH BC 4857 5 4 316 186 470 39.57% 6** ALBERT HELLYER BC 3422 4 5 269 148 430 34.41% 7** JOE BRIETKOPF BC 0648 4 5 281 158 474 33.33% 8** RAY JEROME BC 1282 4 5 300 135 442 30.54% 9 VINCE HERKEL BC 3306 2 7 254 154 466 33.04% 10 WILF BLANCHARD BC 0000 0 9 158 89 404 22.02% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# AL GUSHTA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 42/14 19 40 47.50 9 VINCE HERKEL W 41/24 21 56 37.50 8 RAY JEROME W 41/36 23 56 41.07 7 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/12 20 42 47.61 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 42/30 30 70 42.85 4 DALE WALCH L 21/40 13 46 28.26 2 RON DENMAN W 45/16 19 44 43.18 6 ALBERT HELLYER L 36/43 18 54 33.33 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/33 23 60 38.33 2 RON DENMAN W 40/29 22 48 45.83 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 208 516 40.31 2 RON DENMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 RAY JEROME L 11/40 6 36 16.66 6 ALBERT HELLYER W 41/32 23 52 44.23 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 42/25 27 42 64.28 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 41/11 18 40 45.00 4 DALE WALCH W 41/31 21 50 42.00 9 VINCE HERKEL W 42/30 22 54 40.74 1 AL GUSHTA L 16/45 10 44 22.72 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/17 18 36 50.00 7 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/12 21 38 55.26 1 AL GUSHTA L 29/40 18 48 37.50 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 184 440 41.81 3* ROBIN DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/32 25 60 41.66 7 JOE BRIETKOPF W 43/23 18 56 32.14 2 RON DENMAN L 25/42 22 42 52.38 4 DALE WALCH W 40/24 19 50 38.00 1 AL GUSHTA L 30/42 27 70 38.57 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 41/18 14 46 30.43 6 ALBERT HELLYER W 43/11 21 42 50.00 9 VINCE HERKEL L 18/40 16 46 34.78 8 RAY JEROME W 40/36 18 52 34.61 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 35%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 180 464 38.79 4* DALE WALCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 JOE BRIETKOPF L 32/42 13 64 20.31 8 RAY JEROME W 40/19 20 44 45.45 5 LOU BUSCH W 40/25 21 46 45.65 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 24/40 12 50 24.00 2 RON DENMAN L 31/41 16 50 32.00 1 AL GUSHTA W 40/21 16 46 34.78 9 VINCE HERKEL W 45/29 23 54 42.59 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 43/37 19 60 31.66 6 ALBERT HELLYER W 40/21 16 44 36.36 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 156 458 34.06 5 LOU BUSCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 32/41 24 60 40.00 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 42/17 18 44 40.90 4 DALE WALCH L 25/40 18 46 39.13 6 ALBERT HELLYER W 42/10 20 46 43.47 9 VINCE HERKEL W 40/32 21 58 36.20 8 RAY JEROME W 43/27 21 54 38.88 7 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/38 35 66 53.03 2 RON DENMAN L 17/41 9 36 25.00 1 AL GUSHTA L 33/41 20 60 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 186 470 39.57 6** ALBERT HELLYER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 VINCE HERKEL W 44/29 30 64 46.87 2 RON DENMAN L 32/41 20 52 38.46 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 41/8 15 28 53.57 5 LOU BUSCH L 10/42 12 46 26.08 8 RAY JEROME W 40/20 22 54 40.74 7 JOE BRIETKOPF L 27/40 10 46 21.73 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 11/43 8 42 19.04 1 AL GUSHTA W 43/36 19 54 35.18 4 DALE WALCH L 21/40 12 44 27.27 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 35%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 148 430 34.41 7** JOE BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DALE WALCH W 42/32 18 64 28.12 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 23/43 11 56 19.64 9 VINCE HERKEL W 41/12 19 46 41.30 1 AL GUSHTA L 12/40 14 42 33.33 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 40/23 19 58 32.75 6 ALBERT HELLYER W 40/27 15 46 32.60 5 LOU BUSCH L 38/42 33 66 50.00 8 RAY JEROME L 33/41 16 58 27.58 2 RON DENMAN L 12/41 13 38 34.21 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 39%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 158 474 33.33 8** RAY JEROME - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 RON DENMAN W 40/11 14 36 38.88 4 DALE WALCH L 19/40 14 44 31.81 1 AL GUSHTA L 36/41 19 56 33.92 9 VINCE HERKEL W 40/17 11 44 25.00 6 ALBERT HELLYER L 20/40 15 54 27.77 5 LOU BUSCH L 27/43 14 54 25.92 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 41/17 15 44 34.09 7 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/33 17 58 29.31 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 36/40 16 52 30.76 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 35%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 135 442 30.54 9 VINCE HERKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ALBERT HELLYER L 29/44 25 64 39.06 1 AL GUSHTA L 24/41 16 56 28.57 7 JOE BRIETKOPF L 12/41 10 46 21.73 8 RAY JEROME L 17/40 8 44 18.18 5 LOU BUSCH L 32/40 19 58 32.75 2 RON DENMAN L 30/42 18 54 33.33 4 DALE WALCH L 29/45 18 54 33.33 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/18 23 46 50.00 10 WILF BLANCHARD W 41/13 17 44 38.63 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 36%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 154 466 33.04 10 WILF BLANCHARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 AL GUSHTA L 14/42 10 40 25.00 5 LOU BUSCH L 17/42 9 44 20.45 6 ALBERT HELLYER L 8/41 4 28 14.28 2 RON DENMAN L 11/41 9 40 22.50 7 JOE BRIETKOPF L 23/40 16 58 27.58 3 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 18/41 7 46 15.21 8 RAY JEROME L 17/41 10 44 22.72 4 DALE WALCH L 37/43 18 60 30.00 9 VINCE HERKEL L 13/41 6 44 13.63 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 0 L 9 89 404 22.02 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 MEN - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS BC 1401 8 1 319 143 364 39.28% 2 LES ANDERSON BC 4226 7 2 300 133 384 34.63% 3 COLIN FREDRICKSON BC 1700 6 3 261 113 378 29.89% 4* HERB BOSCHMAN BC 2921 5 4 226 109 358 30.44% 5* NICK CULIC BC 3486 5 4 247 115 426 26.99% 6* SAM TAYLOR BC 1288 5 4 243 94 390 24.10% 7** BERT ALLEN BC 0556 3 6 227 113 402 28.10% 8** DON MCSWAIN BC 1237 3 6 226 102 396 25.75% 9 DON MORGAN BC 0122 2 7 183 88 362 24.30% 10 KEN HENDERSON BC 9784 1 8 191 91 420 21.66% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 KEN HENDERSON W 37/15 14 44 31.81 6 SAM TAYLOR W 37/9 14 38 36.84 4 HERB BOSCHMAN W 35/11 19 38 50.00 7 BERT ALLEN W 39/17 18 34 52.94 2 LES ANDERSON W 35/12 14 42 33.33 8 DON MCSWAIN W 35/19 15 42 35.71 5 NICK CULIC L 31/35 20 54 37.03 3 COLI FREDRICKSON W 35/9 11 28 39.28 9 DON MORGAN W 35/29 18 44 40.90 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 8 L 1 143 364 39.28 2 LES ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 BERT ALLEN W 37/24 20 54 37.03 5 NICK CULIC W 40/20 21 52 40.38 8 DON MCSWAIN W 35/10 11 32 34.37 9 DON MORGAN W 36/2 12 26 46.15 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 12/35 9 42 21.42 6 SAM TAYLOR L 31/39 11 56 19.64 3 COLI FREDRICKSON W 35/13 17 42 40.47 10 KEN HENDERSON W 38/19 16 46 34.78 4 HERB BOSCHMAN W 36/8 16 34 47.05 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 133 384 34.63 3 COLIN FREDRICKSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 DON MORGAN W 39/17 17 38 44.73 10 KEN HENDERSON W 35/13 16 30 53.33 7 BERT ALLEN L 23/37 10 50 20.00 4 HERB BOSCHMAN W 37/3 11 34 32.35 8 DON MCSWAIN W 35/21 17 58 29.31 5 NICK CULIC W 35/24 16 56 28.57 2 LES ANDERSON L 13/35 9 42 21.42 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 9/35 2 28 7.14 6 SAM TAYLOR W 35/8 15 42 35.71 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 113 378 29.89 4* HERB BOSCHMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 DON MCSWAIN W 36/17 18 42 42.85 7 BERT ALLEN W 35/10 12 38 31.57 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 11/35 12 38 31.57 3 COLI FREDRICKSON L 3/37 3 34 8.82 5 NICK CULIC L 22/35 12 38 31.57 9 DON MORGAN W 36/8 17 38 44.73 10 KEN HENDERSON W 40/24 15 54 27.77 6 SAM TAYLOR W 35/31 14 42 33.33 2 LES ANDERSON L 8/36 6 34 17.64 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 109 358 30.44 5* NICK CULIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 SAM TAYLOR L 12/37 5 38 13.15 2 LES ANDERSON L 20/40 12 52 23.07 10 KEN HENDERSON W 35/22 18 58 31.03 8 DON MCSWAIN W 36/19 11 42 26.19 4 HERB BOSCHMAN W 35/22 16 38 42.10 3 COLI FREDRICKSON L 24/35 13 56 23.21 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS W 35/31 18 54 33.33 9 DON MORGAN L 13/35 5 36 13.88 7 BERT ALLEN W 37/21 17 52 32.69 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 115 426 26.99 6* SAM TAYLOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 NICK CULIC W 37/12 12 38 31.57 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 9/37 5 38 13.15 9 DON MORGAN W 36/27 14 44 31.81 10 KEN HENDERSON W 36/25 8 42 19.04 7 BERT ALLEN W 36/21 16 52 30.76 2 LES ANDERSON W 39/31 11 56 19.64 8 DON MCSWAIN L 11/35 8 36 22.22 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 31/35 12 42 28.57 3 COLI FREDRICKSON L 8/35 8 42 19.04 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 94 390 24.10 7** BERT ALLEN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LES ANDERSON L 24/37 13 54 24.07 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 10/35 6 38 15.78 3 COLI FREDRICKSON W 37/23 18 50 36.00 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 17/39 10 34 29.41 6 SAM TAYLOR L 21/36 15 52 28.84 10 KEN HENDERSON W 35/16 12 38 31.57 9 DON MORGAN W 37/9 15 38 39.47 8 DON MCSWAIN L 25/37 12 46 26.08 5 NICK CULIC L 21/37 12 52 23.07 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 113 402 28.10 8** DON MCSWAIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 17/36 12 42 28.57 9 DON MORGAN W 37/21 14 44 31.81 2 LES ANDERSON L 10/35 5 32 15.62 5 NICK CULIC L 19/36 7 42 16.66 3 COLI FREDRICKSON L 21/35 13 58 22.41 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 19/35 9 42 21.42 6 SAM TAYLOR W 35/11 14 36 38.88 7 BERT ALLEN W 37/25 17 46 36.95 10 KEN HENDERSON L 31/36 11 54 20.37 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 102 396 25.75 9 DON MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 COLI FREDRICKSON L 17/39 9 38 23.68 8 DON MCSWAIN L 21/37 9 44 20.45 6 SAM TAYLOR L 27/36 12 44 27.27 2 LES ANDERSON L 2/36 2 26 7.69 10 KEN HENDERSON W 35/21 16 54 29.62 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 8/36 9 38 23.68 7 BERT ALLEN L 9/37 5 38 13.15 5 NICK CULIC W 35/13 11 36 30.55 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 29/35 15 44 34.09 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 88 362 24.30 10 KEN HENDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ALLAN CUMMINGS L 15/37 8 44 18.18 3 COLI FREDRICKSON L 13/35 10 30 33.33 5 NICK CULIC L 22/35 14 58 24.13 6 SAM TAYLOR L 25/36 7 42 16.66 9 DON MORGAN L 21/35 11 54 20.37 7 BERT ALLEN L 16/35 7 38 18.42 4 HERB BOSCHMAN L 24/40 12 54 22.22 2 LES ANDERSON L 19/38 8 46 17.39 8 DON MCSWAIN W 36/31 14 54 25.92 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 1 L 8 91 420 21.66 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 MEN - CLASS D (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 TOM HARRIS BC 0525 9 1 345 87 444 19.59% 2 DAVE BARTON BC 9770 8 2 313 105 460 22.82% 3 DAN COFFIN BC 3287 7 3 315 90 514 17.50% 4 PHIL KREPPS BC 1460 3 7 243 77 498 15.46% 5 JOHN HAMLER BC 0119 2 8 194 68 470 14.46% 6 LAWRENCE WEINENGER BC 0120 1 9 224 69 538 12.82% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 TOM HARRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JOHN HAMLER W 36/16 10 50 20.00 2 DAVE BARTON W 35/2 8 32 25.00 3 DAN COFFIN W 35/16 8 46 17.39 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 36/3 8 36 22.22 4 PHIL KREPPS W 36/9 12 40 30.00 5 JOHN HAMLER W 36/18 6 38 15.78 2 DAVE BARTON W 36/20 7 56 12.50 3 DAN COFFIN L 24/35 9 48 18.75 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 35/14 6 48 12.50 4 PHIL KREPPS W 36/23 13 50 26.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 87 444 19.59 2 DAVE BARTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 PHIL KREPPS W 35/9 12 48 25.00 1 TOM HARRIS L 2/35 3 32 9.37 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 37/25 12 54 22.22 5 JOHN HAMLER W 35/24 10 46 21.73 3 DAN COFFIN W 39/24 9 56 16.07 4 PHIL KREPPS W 35/26 13 44 29.54 1 TOM HARRIS L 20/36 4 56 7.14 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 35/29 12 52 23.07 5 JOHN HAMLER W 38/6 15 28 53.57 3 DAN COFFIN W 37/28 15 44 34.09 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 105 460 22.82 3 DAN COFFIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 35/33 11 66 16.66 5 JOHN HAMLER W 35/11 8 40 20.00 1 TOM HARRIS L 16/35 5 46 10.86 4 PHIL KREPPS W 35/19 8 54 14.81 2 DAVE BARTON L 24/39 3 56 5.35 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 35/25 10 64 15.62 5 JOHN HAMLER W 35/18 12 50 24.00 1 TOM HARRIS W 35/24 11 48 22.91 4 PHIL KREPPS W 37/24 10 46 21.73 2 DAVE BARTON L 28/37 12 44 27.27 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 90 514 17.50 4 PHIL KREPPS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DAVE BARTON L 9/35 6 48 12.50 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 36/15 7 58 12.06 5 JOHN HAMLER L 24/37 6 62 9.67 3 DAN COFFIN L 19/35 6 54 11.11 1 TOM HARRIS L 9/36 3 40 7.50 2 DAVE BARTON L 26/35 11 44 25.00 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 37/18 10 50 20.00 5 JOHN HAMLER W 36/22 11 46 23.91 3 DAN COFFIN L 24/37 7 46 15.21 1 TOM HARRIS L 23/36 10 50 20.00 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 77 498 15.46 5 JOHN HAMLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM HARRIS L 16/36 8 50 16.00 3 DAN COFFIN L 11/35 5 40 12.50 4 PHIL KREPPS W 37/24 9 62 14.51 2 DAVE BARTON L 24/35 7 46 15.21 6 LAWREN WEINENGER W 36/25 8 64 12.50 1 TOM HARRIS L 18/36 6 38 15.78 3 DAN COFFIN L 18/35 10 50 20.00 4 PHIL KREPPS L 22/36 8 46 17.39 2 DAVE BARTON L 6/38 6 28 21.42 6 LAWREN WEINENGER L 6/37 1 46 2.17 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 68 470 14.46 6 LAWRENCE WEINENGER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DAN COFFIN L 33/35 13 66 19.69 4 PHIL KREPPS L 15/36 6 58 10.34 2 DAVE BARTON L 25/37 8 54 14.81 1 TOM HARRIS L 3/36 1 36 2.77 5 JOHN HAMLER L 25/36 5 64 7.81 3 DAN COFFIN L 25/35 8 64 12.50 4 PHIL KREPPS L 18/37 6 50 12.00 2 DAVE BARTON L 29/35 10 52 19.23 1 TOM HARRIS L 14/35 4 48 8.33 5 JOHN HAMLER W 37/6 8 46 17.39 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 69 538 12.82 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC CHAMPIONSHIPS - PENTICTON - September 3, 2005 MEN - CLASS E (30Pts/40Sh) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CHRIS MACDONALD BC 4086 8 1 225 72 338 21.30% 2 BOB BARKER BC 1289 5 4 186 48 354 13.55% 3 FRANK HUBICK BC 0880 4 5 170 40 356 11.23% 4 ED SKRODOLIS BC 0888 1 8 96 25 340 7.35% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CHRIS MACDONALD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 FRANK HUBICK W 20/16 4 40 10.00 4 ED SKRODOLIS W 30/6 6 32 18.75 2 BOB BARKER W 22/20 8 40 20.00 3 FRANK HUBICK L 21/26 7 40 17.50 4 ED SKRODOLIS W 32/6 10 28 35.71 2 BOB BARKER W 27/16 13 40 32.50 3 FRANK HUBICK W 18/9 6 40 15.00 4 ED SKRODOLIS W 22/12 7 40 17.50 2 BOB BARKER W 33/13 11 38 28.94 (Was 12%) TOTALS W 8 L 1 72 338 21.30 2 BOB BARKER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ED SKRODOLIS W 27/7 8 40 20.00 3 FRANK HUBICK W 27/7 5 40 12.50 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 20/22 6 40 15.00 4 ED SKRODOLIS W 24/7 5 40 12.50 3 FRANK HUBICK L 13/32 4 36 11.11 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 16/27 8 40 20.00 4 ED SKRODOLIS W 24/7 2 40 5.00 3 FRANK HUBICK W 22/18 7 40 17.50 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 13/33 3 38 7.89 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 48 354 13.55 3 FRANK HUBICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 16/20 0 40 None 2 BOB BARKER L 7/27 1 40 2.50 4 ED SKRODOLIS W 29/9 7 40 17.50 1 CHRIS MACDONALD W 26/21 8 40 20.00 2 BOB BARKER W 32/13 7 36 19.44 4 ED SKRODOLIS L 15/26 4 40 10.00 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 9/18 4 40 10.00 2 BOB BARKER L 18/22 5 40 12.50 4 ED SKRODOLIS W 18/16 4 40 10.00 (Was 9%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 40 356 11.23 4 ED SKRODOLIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BOB BARKER L 7/27 3 40 7.50 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 6/30 0 32 None 3 FRANK HUBICK L 9/29 2 40 5.00 2 BOB BARKER L 7/24 3 40 7.50 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 6/32 3 28 10.71 3 FRANK HUBICK W 26/15 5 40 12.50 2 BOB BARKER L 7/24 2 40 5.00 1 CHRIS MACDONALD L 12/22 4 40 10.00 3 FRANK HUBICK L 16/18 3 40 7.50 (Was 4%) TOTALS W 1 L 8 25 340 7.35