THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 WOMEN - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ELYSE BRUNELLE BC 0306 8 5 493 415 714 58.12% 2 DOREEN MULOIN BC 9781 7 6 461 398 724 54.97% 3 CAROL ORMISTON BC 3903 4 8 312 288 590 48.81% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ELYSE BRUNELLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 38/42 44 76 57.89 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 37/42 30 60 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 40/36 41 68 60.29 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 39/40 29 54 53.70 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 13/40 33 56 58.92 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 31/44 35 64 54.68 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 44/39 31 62 50.00 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 44/9 26 44 59.09 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 42/33 41 66 62.12 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 41/7 22 28 78.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 41/34 36 62 58.06 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 43/30 25 40 62.50 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 40/12 22 34 64.70 (Was 67%) TOTALS W 8 L 5 415 714 58.12 2 DOREEN MULOIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 40/25 26 52 50.00 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 42/38 42 76 55.26 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 45/5 32 42 76.19 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 36/40 38 68 55.88 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 41/16 27 48 56.25 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 40/13 41 56 73.21 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 41/27 31 52 59.61 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 39/44 28 62 45.16 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON W 41/27 29 50 58.00 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 33/42 37 66 56.06 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 CAROL ORMISTON L 17/40 23 56 41.07 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 34/41 31 62 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 12/40 13 34 38.23 (Was 58%) TOTALS W 7 L 6 398 724 54.97 3 CAROL ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 25/40 24 52 46.15 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 42/37 31 60 51.66 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 5/45 19 42 45.23 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 40/39 28 54 51.85 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 16/41 19 48 39.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 44/31 39 64 60.93 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 27/41 26 52 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 9/44 16 44 36.36 2 DOREEN MULOIN L 27/41 25 50 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 7/41 11 28 39.28 2 DOREEN MULOIN W 40/17 30 56 53.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 30/43 20 40 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 60%) TOTALS W 4 L 8 288 590 48.81 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 WOMEN - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# VERNA WEINGARDT BC 9778 10 3 511 274 646 42.41% 2 YVONNE GREAVES BC 9767 9 4 477 262 586 44.70% 3* MELANIE TAYLOR BC 1025 7 5 422 269 606 44.38% 4* CAROL WILKINSON BC 1510 7 5 413 240 566 42.40% 5 CINDY HELGESON BC 3969 6 6 383 201 550 36.54% 6 PAT ROOKES BC 0914 3 9 306 200 564 35.46% 7 SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 1 11 272 167 542 30.81% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# VERNA WEINGARDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 CINDY HELGESON W 40/36 19 50 38.00 7 SUE BERTRAND W 44/12 18 50 36.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 CAROL WILKINSON L 37/41 22 48 45.83 6 PAT ROOKES W 43/29 23 56 41.07 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 41/12 22 44 50.00 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 29/41 20 48 41.66 5 CINDY HELGESON L 26/40 17 52 32.69 7 SUE BERTRAND W 41/29 17 54 31.48 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 CAROL WILKINSON W 45/36 31 66 46.96 6 PAT ROOKES W 43/26 16 46 34.78 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 40/32 28 60 46.66 2 YVONNE GREAVES W 40/22 24 44 54.54 2 YVONNE GREAVES W 42/12 17 28 60.71 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 10 L 3 274 646 42.41 2 YVONNE GREAVES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 PAT ROOKES W 41/16 20 38 52.63 7 SUE BERTRAND W 40/17 15 44 34.09 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 35/42 28 68 41.17 4 CAROL WILKINSON W 43/24 19 46 41.30 5 CINDY HELGESON L 35/43 20 54 37.03 1 VERNA WEINGARDT W 41/29 24 48 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 6 PAT ROOKES W 41/13 21 42 50.00 7 SUE BERTRAND W 42/16 18 32 56.25 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 43/32 30 58 51.72 4 CAROL WILKINSON W 42/23 24 46 52.17 5 CINDY HELGESON W 40/20 17 38 44.73 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 22/40 19 44 43.18 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 12/42 7 28 25.00 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 9 L 4 262 586 44.70 3* MELANIE TAYLOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 PAT ROOKES W 42/37 24 64 37.50 5 CINDY HELGESON L 19/40 17 50 34.00 4 CAROL WILKINSON W 44/16 22 38 57.89 2 YVONNE GREAVES W 42/35 30 68 44.11 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 12/41 17 44 38.63 7 SUE BERTRAND W 43/19 17 40 42.50 6 PAT ROOKES L 32/42 15 50 30.00 5 CINDY HELGESON W 43/16 21 40 52.50 4 CAROL WILKINSON W 40/25 30 50 60.00 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 32/43 28 58 48.27 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 32/40 28 60 46.66 7 SUE BERTRAND W 41/22 20 44 45.45 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 269 606 44.38 4* CAROL WILKINSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 SUE BERTRAND W 40/17 15 34 44.11 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 16/44 12 38 31.57 1 VERNA WEINGARDT W 41/37 22 48 45.83 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 24/43 13 46 28.26 6 PAT ROOKES W 42/22 25 50 50.00 5 CINDY HELGESON W 43/20 18 38 47.36 7 SUE BERTRAND W 41/34 19 54 35.18 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 25/40 25 50 50.00 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 36/45 29 66 43.93 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 23/42 18 46 39.13 6 PAT ROOKES W 41/14 30 52 57.69 5 CINDY HELGESON W 41/11 14 44 31.81 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 38%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 240 566 42.40 5 CINDY HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 36/40 22 50 44.00 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 40/19 22 50 44.00 6 PAT ROOKES W 41/12 16 38 42.10 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 SUE BERTRAND W 40/29 17 48 35.41 2 YVONNE GREAVES W 43/35 21 54 38.88 4 CAROL WILKINSON L 20/43 10 38 26.31 1 VERNA WEINGARDT W 40/26 25 52 48.07 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 16/43 12 40 30.00 6 PAT ROOKES W 41/12 20 42 47.61 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 SUE BERTRAND L 35/41 20 56 35.71 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 20/40 10 38 26.31 4 CAROL WILKINSON L 11/41 6 44 13.63 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 42%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 201 550 36.54 6 PAT ROOKES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 37/42 21 64 32.81 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 16/41 13 38 34.21 5 CINDY HELGESON L 12/41 9 38 23.68 7 SUE BERTRAND W 41/12 17 34 50.00 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 29/43 22 56 39.28 4 CAROL WILKINSON L 22/42 19 50 38.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 MELANIE TAYLOR W 42/32 18 50 36.00 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 13/41 13 42 30.95 5 CINDY HELGESON L 12/41 11 42 26.19 7 SUE BERTRAND W 42/24 24 52 46.15 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 26/43 12 46 26.08 4 CAROL WILKINSON L 14/41 21 52 40.38 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 3 L 9 200 564 35.46 7 SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CAROL WILKINSON L 17/40 8 34 23.52 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 12/44 10 50 20.00 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 17/40 10 44 22.72 6 PAT ROOKES L 12/41 8 34 23.52 5 CINDY HELGESON L 29/40 16 48 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 19/43 11 40 27.50 4 CAROL WILKINSON L 34/41 20 54 37.03 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 29/41 16 54 29.62 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 16/42 11 32 34.37 6 PAT ROOKES L 24/42 20 52 38.46 5 CINDY HELGESON W 41/35 23 56 41.07 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 MELANIE TAYLOR L 22/41 14 44 31.81 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 35%) TOTALS W 1 L 11 167 542 30.81 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 WOMEN - CLASS C (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF BC 0649 10 2 267 92 462 19.91% 2* SHIRLEY HOPKINS BC 3160 8 4 245 90 426 21.12% 3* SYLVIANNE MORGAN BC 9803 8 4 230 92 436 21.10% 4** LUCILLE SEXSMITH BC 1903 7 5 213 89 442 20.13% 5** MARLENE GARNER BC 1808 7 5 216 78 456 17.10% 6 ANNETTE HUGHES BC 1807 2 10 1 47 258 18.21% 7 Raquel Schaefer {Pacer} 0509 0 12 294 131 424 30.89% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 6 50 12.00 5 MARLENE GARNER L 10/32 2 30 6.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 32/19 11 52 21.15 7 Raquel Schaefer W 32/23 12 50 24.00 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH W 30/12 9 32 28.12 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 33/20 10 48 20.83 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 5 MARLENE GARNER W 32/18 11 38 28.94 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 27/32 8 44 18.18 7 Raquel Schaefer W 7/30 2 30 6.66 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH W 31/24 9 42 21.42 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 31/25 12 46 26.08 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 10 L 2 92 462 19.91 2* SHIRLEY HOPKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 Raquel Schaefer W 31/24 11 44 25.00 5 MARLENE GARNER L 18/32 6 34 17.64 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH W 30/3 11 32 34.37 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 23/30 5 46 10.86 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 10 26 38.46 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 20/33 5 48 10.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 7 Raquel Schaefer W 1/30 6 26 23.07 5 MARLENE GARNER W 30/24 8 50 16.00 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH W 31/14 7 38 18.42 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 34/23 12 36 33.33 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 25/31 9 46 19.56 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 90 426 21.12 3* SYLVIANNE MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 MARLENE GARNER W 30/7 9 30 30.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH L 29/33 13 46 28.26 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 19/32 8 52 15.38 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 30/23 9 46 19.56 7 Raquel Schaefer W 13/33 8 32 25.00 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 8 42 19.04 5 MARLENE GARNER W 30/18 8 48 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH L 16/32 7 34 20.58 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 32/27 9 44 20.45 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 23/34 9 36 25.00 7 Raquel Schaefer W 6/30 4 26 15.38 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 92 436 21.10 4** LUCILLE SEXSMITH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 Raquel Schaefer W 22/30 12 50 24.00 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 10 40 25.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 33/29 13 46 28.26 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 3/30 6 32 18.75 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 12/30 4 32 12.50 5 MARLENE GARNER W 32/14 10 36 27.77 7 Raquel Schaefer W 19/30 8 40 20.00 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 32/16 10 34 29.41 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 14/31 4 38 10.52 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 24/31 7 42 16.66 5 MARLENE GARNER L 20/30 5 52 9.61 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 89 442 20.13 5** MARLENE GARNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 7/30 1 30 3.33 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 32/10 9 30 30.00 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 32/18 10 34 29.41 7 Raquel Schaefer W 18/30 9 36 25.00 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 8 56 14.28 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH L 14/32 5 36 13.88 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 18/30 5 48 10.41 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 18/32 7 38 18.42 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 24/30 8 50 16.00 7 Raquel Schaefer W 21/33 9 46 19.56 6 ANNETTE HUGHES W 1/0 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH W 30/20 7 52 13.46 (Was 15%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 78 456 17.10 6 ANNETTE HUGHES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 0/1 10 50 20.00 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH L 0/1 9 40 22.50 7 Raquel Schaefer W 0/1 11 44 25.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 MARLENE GARNER L 0/1 11 56 19.64 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 0/1 4 26 15.38 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 0/1 2 42 4.76 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 0/1 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH L 0/1 7 Raquel Schaefer W 1/0 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 MARLENE GARNER L 0/1 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 0/1 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 0/1 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 2 L 10 47 258 18.21 7 Raquel Schaefer - {Pacer} OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH L 30/22 14 50 28.00 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 24/31 12 44 27.27 6 ANNETTE HUGHES L 1/0 11 44 25.00 5 MARLENE GARNER L 30/18 13 36 36.11 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 23/32 11 50 22.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 33/13 14 32 43.75 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 LUCILLE SEXSMITH L 30/19 10 40 25.00 2 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 30/1 14 26 53.84 6 ANNETTE HUGHES L 0/1 5 MARLENE GARNER L 33/21 13 46 28.26 1 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 30/7 9 30 30.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 30/6 10 26 38.46 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (PACER) TOTALS W 0 L 12 131 424 30.89 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 MEN - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BUDDY DYRDA BC 0264 10 0 417 239 398 60.05% 2 TONY RONDOW BC 0600 8 2 402 254 438 57.99% 3 FRED ORMISTON BC 3946 5 5 324 186 472 39.40% 4* AL GUSHTA BC 1504 3 7 238 143 478 29.91% 5* LOU BUSCH BC 4857 3 7 188 109 420 25.95% 6 JOE BRIETKOPF BC 0648 1 9 232 154 502 30.67% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BUDDY DYRDA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/4 21 36 58.33 3 FRED ORMISTON W 40/14 23 38 60.52 4 AL GUSHTA W 45/8 20 34 58.82 5 LOU BUSCH W 43/0 17 20 85.00 2 TONY RONDOW W 40/36 34 64 53.12 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/11 20 36 55.55 3 FRED ORMISTON W 41/25 21 40 52.50 4 AL GUSHTA W 41/7 24 34 70.58 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/12 23 40 57.50 2 TONY RONDOW W 44/32 36 56 64.28 (Was 63%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 239 398 60.05 2 TONY RONDOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 AL GUSHTA W 41/13 18 34 52.94 5 LOU BUSCH W 45/6 19 30 63.33 3 FRED ORMISTON W 41/25 34 64 53.12 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 43/21 24 48 50.00 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 36/40 34 64 53.12 4 AL GUSHTA W 41/13 26 38 68.42 5 LOU BUSCH W 42/5 22 34 64.70 3 FRED ORMISTON W 40/13 27 42 64.28 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/6 19 28 67.85 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 32/44 31 56 55.35 (Was 60%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 254 438 57.99 3 FRED ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LOU BUSCH W 45/12 17 40 42.50 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 14/40 14 38 36.84 2 TONY RONDOW L 25/41 28 64 43.75 4 AL GUSHTA W 41/17 19 50 38.00 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/25 18 52 34.61 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/7 14 34 41.17 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 25/41 15 40 37.50 2 TONY RONDOW L 13/40 19 42 45.23 4 AL GUSHTA L 36/40 22 62 35.48 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 43/23 20 50 40.00 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 186 472 39.40 4* AL GUSHTA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 TONY RONDOW L 13/41 10 34 29.41 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/39 21 66 31.81 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 8/45 9 34 26.47 3 FRED ORMISTON L 17/41 12 50 24.00 5 LOU BUSCH W 42/20 18 50 36.00 2 TONY RONDOW L 13/41 16 38 42.10 6 JOE BRIETKOPF L 34/40 19 62 30.64 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 7/41 12 34 35.29 3 FRED ORMISTON W 40/36 18 62 29.03 5 LOU BUSCH L 23/42 8 48 16.66 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 143 478 29.91 5* LOU BUSCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 FRED ORMISTON L 12/45 6 40 15.00 2 TONY RONDOW L 6/45 6 30 20.00 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/25 18 52 34.61 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 0/43 3 20 15.00 4 AL GUSHTA L 20/42 11 50 22.00 3 FRED ORMISTON L 7/41 4 34 11.76 2 TONY RONDOW L 5/42 10 34 29.41 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/38 24 72 33.33 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 12/41 14 40 35.00 4 AL GUSHTA W 42/23 13 48 27.08 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 109 420 25.95 6 JOE BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 4/42 9 36 25.00 4 AL GUSHTA L 39/41 19 66 28.78 5 LOU BUSCH L 25/42 13 52 25.00 2 TONY RONDOW L 21/43 17 48 35.41 3 FRED ORMISTON L 25/41 15 52 28.84 1 BUDDY DYRDA L 11/40 11 36 30.55 4 AL GUSHTA W 40/34 21 62 33.87 5 LOU BUSCH L 38/42 26 72 36.11 2 TONY RONDOW L 6/41 8 28 28.57 3 FRED ORMISTON L 23/43 15 50 30.00 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 154 502 30.67 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 MEN - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 LYLE CUTLER BC 1617 7 3 380 158 494 31.98% 2 DALE WALCH BC 1103 6 4 347 164 546 30.03% 3* ERICH SCHAEFER ALTA 0405 5 5 309 153 460 33.26% 4* RAY JEROME BC 1282 5 5 348 152 504 30.15% 5 DON MORGAN BC 0122 4 6 310 150 502 29.88% 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF BC 0061 3 7 293 144 466 30.90% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 LYLE CUTLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DON MORGAN W 41/27 18 48 37.50 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 40/24 13 46 28.26 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/15 19 42 45.23 2 DALE WALCH W 40/36 16 54 29.62 4 RAY JEROME W 41/35 17 54 31.48 5 DON MORGAN L 21/42 14 44 31.81 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 40/28 18 56 32.14 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 44/35 15 50 30.00 2 DALE WALCH L 38/44 16 56 28.57 4 RAY JEROME L 35/40 12 44 27.27 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 158 494 31.98 2 DALE WALCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 RAY JEROME L 22/40 11 60 18.33 5 DON MORGAN W 40/35 15 54 27.77 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 41/13 16 42 38.09 1 LYLE CUTLER L 36/40 15 54 27.77 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 18/42 11 44 25.00 4 RAY JEROME W 45/31 23 64 35.93 5 DON MORGAN W 45/33 18 58 31.03 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 14/40 12 56 21.42 1 LYLE CUTLER W 44/38 21 56 37.50 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 42/35 22 58 37.93 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 164 546 30.03 3* ERICH SCHAEFER - ALTA OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/21 22 52 42.30 1 LYLE CUTLER L 24/40 9 46 19.56 2 DALE WALCH L 13/41 11 42 26.19 4 RAY JEROME W 42/29 17 44 38.63 5 DON MORGAN W 42/5 17 40 42.50 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 10/40 6 36 16.66 1 LYLE CUTLER L 28/40 16 56 28.57 2 DALE WALCH W 40/14 22 56 39.28 4 RAY JEROME W 40/19 19 40 47.50 5 DON MORGAN L 30/43 14 48 29.16 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 153 460 33.26 4* RAY JEROME - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DALE WALCH W 40/22 16 60 26.66 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 42/26 16 46 34.78 5 DON MORGAN L 32/41 17 62 27.41 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 29/42 12 44 27.27 1 LYLE CUTLER L 35/41 15 54 27.77 2 DALE WALCH L 31/45 19 64 29.68 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/21 13 40 32.50 5 DON MORGAN W 40/29 18 50 36.00 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 19/40 11 40 27.50 1 LYLE CUTLER W 40/35 15 44 34.09 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 152 504 30.15 5 DON MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 LYLE CUTLER L 27/41 12 48 25.00 2 DALE WALCH L 35/40 16 54 29.62 4 RAY JEROME W 41/32 19 62 30.64 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 15/43 10 46 21.73 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 5/42 4 40 10.00 1 LYLE CUTLER W 42/21 22 44 50.00 2 DALE WALCH L 33/45 16 58 27.58 4 RAY JEROME L 29/40 14 50 28.00 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 40/15 17 52 32.69 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 43/30 20 48 41.66 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 150 502 29.88 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 21/40 15 52 28.84 4 RAY JEROME L 26/42 10 46 21.73 1 LYLE CUTLER L 15/40 12 42 28.57 5 DON MORGAN W 43/15 20 46 43.47 2 DALE WALCH W 42/18 19 44 43.18 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 40/10 14 36 38.88 4 RAY JEROME L 21/40 8 40 20.00 1 LYLE CUTLER L 35/44 14 50 28.00 5 DON MORGAN L 15/40 12 52 23.07 2 DALE WALCH L 35/42 20 58 34.48 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 144 466 30.90 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 MEN - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BERT ALLEN BC 0556 10 0 294 114 352 32.38% 2 VINCE HERKEL BC 3306 8 2 243 96 340 28.23% 3 FRED GORDON BC 0663 6 4 252 90 348 25.86% 4 LES ANDERSON BC 4226 4 6 213 89 358 24.86% 5 DARRYL OLSON BC 0921 2 8 126 50 358 13.96% 6 DON MCSWAIN BC 1237 0 10 0 0 0 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BERT ALLEN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 4 LES ANDERSON W 40/28 16 50 32.00 5 DARRYL OLSON W 36/19 14 50 28.00 2 VINCE HERKEL W 37/12 15 42 35.71 3 FRED GORDON W 35/31 16 48 33.33 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 4 LES ANDERSON W 36/14 19 44 43.18 5 DARRYL OLSON W 35/10 11 26 42.30 2 VINCE HERKEL W 37/18 12 44 27.27 3 FRED GORDON W 36/30 11 48 22.91 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 114 352 32.38 2 VINCE HERKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 FRED GORDON W 36/21 12 38 31.57 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 4 LES ANDERSON W 35/23 12 48 25.00 1 BERT ALLEN L 12/37 8 42 19.04 5 DARRYL OLSON W 35/13 18 54 33.33 3 FRED GORDON W 35/25 12 38 31.57 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 4 LES ANDERSON W 35/34 15 48 31.25 1 BERT ALLEN L 18/37 8 44 18.18 5 DARRYL OLSON W 35/4 11 28 39.28 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 96 340 28.23 3 FRED GORDON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 VINCE HERKEL L 21/36 10 38 26.31 5 DARRYL OLSON W 35/30 12 56 21.42 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 4 LES ANDERSON W 35/7 14 24 58.33 1 BERT ALLEN L 31/35 12 48 25.00 2 VINCE HERKEL L 25/35 10 38 26.31 5 DARRYL OLSON W 37/13 8 48 16.66 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 4 LES ANDERSON W 36/32 12 48 25.00 1 BERT ALLEN L 30/36 12 48 25.00 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 90 348 25.86 4 LES ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DARRYL OLSON W 35/15 14 40 35.00 1 BERT ALLEN L 28/40 12 50 24.00 2 VINCE HERKEL L 23/35 10 48 20.83 3 FRED GORDON L 7/35 5 24 20.83 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 5 DARRYL OLSON W 38/20 12 56 21.42 1 BERT ALLEN L 14/36 12 44 27.27 2 VINCE HERKEL L 34/35 15 48 31.25 3 FRED GORDON L 32/36 9 48 18.75 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 89 358 24.86 5 DARRYL OLSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 LES ANDERSON L 15/35 6 40 15.00 3 FRED GORDON L 30/35 10 56 17.85 1 BERT ALLEN L 19/36 8 50 16.00 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 2 VINCE HERKEL L 13/35 11 54 20.37 4 LES ANDERSON L 20/38 7 56 12.50 3 FRED GORDON L 13/37 3 48 6.25 1 BERT ALLEN L 10/35 4 26 15.38 6 DON MCSWAIN W 1/0 2 VINCE HERKEL L 4/35 1 28 3.57 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 50 358 13.96 6 DON MCSWAIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BERT ALLEN L 0/1 2 VINCE HERKEL L 0/1 3 FRED GORDON L 0/1 5 DARRYL OLSON L 0/1 4 LES ANDERSON L 0/1 1 BERT ALLEN L 0/1 2 VINCE HERKEL L 0/1 3 FRED GORDON L 0/1 5 DARRYL OLSON L 0/1 4 LES ANDERSON L 0/1 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 0 0 None This Class Pitched on Day 1 Shift 1 and Day 2 Shift 1 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 MEN - CLASS D (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 NICK CULIC BC 3486 7 3 328 123 478 25.73% 2* GLEN ROBINSON BC 0117 6 4 322 117 522 22.41% 3* KEN HENDERSON BC 9784 6 4 315 110 548 20.07% 4 CLIFF MILLER ALTA 0000 5 5 287 88 498 17.67% 5** DAN COFFIN BC 3287 3 7 246 92 462 19.91% 6** JOE OLIVER BC 0563 3 7 266 84 584 14.38% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 NICK CULIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CLIFF MILLER L 33/37 13 50 26.00 6 JOE OLIVER W 35/25 7 52 13.46 3 KEN HENDERSON W 37/25 16 60 26.66 5 DAN COFFIN W 35/30 15 42 35.71 2 GLEN ROBINSON L 30/35 16 64 25.00 4 CLIFF MILLER W 35/18 13 46 28.26 6 JOE OLIVER W 39/8 14 42 33.33 3 KEN HENDERSON L 12/39 7 46 15.21 5 DAN COFFIN W 36/12 12 34 35.29 2 GLEN ROBINSON W 36/20 10 42 23.80 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 123 478 25.73 2* GLEN ROBINSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 KEN HENDERSON W 36/30 14 62 22.58 5 DAN COFFIN W 37/11 13 38 34.21 6 JOE OLIVER W 39/18 11 48 22.91 4 CLIFF MILLER W 36/27 14 48 29.16 1 NICK CULIC W 35/30 16 64 25.00 3 KEN HENDERSON L 31/37 12 60 20.00 5 DAN COFFIN L 15/37 7 52 13.46 6 JOE OLIVER W 40/23 11 58 18.96 4 CLIFF MILLER L 33/35 12 50 24.00 1 NICK CULIC L 20/36 7 42 16.66 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 117 522 22.41 3* KEN HENDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 GLEN ROBINSON L 30/36 9 62 14.51 4 CLIFF MILLER L 10/35 4 46 8.69 1 NICK CULIC L 25/37 11 60 18.33 6 JOE OLIVER L 33/35 10 64 15.62 5 DAN COFFIN W 35/17 11 42 26.19 2 GLEN ROBINSON W 37/31 12 60 20.00 4 CLIFF MILLER W 36/23 15 56 26.78 1 NICK CULIC W 39/12 15 46 32.60 6 JOE OLIVER W 35/32 13 62 20.96 5 DAN COFFIN W 35/24 10 50 20.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 110 548 20.07 4 CLIFF MILLER - ALTA OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 NICK CULIC W 37/33 13 50 26.00 3 KEN HENDERSON W 35/10 8 46 17.39 5 DAN COFFIN L 11/35 2 40 5.00 2 GLEN ROBINSON L 27/36 7 48 14.58 6 JOE OLIVER L 31/35 8 62 12.90 1 NICK CULIC L 18/35 7 46 15.21 3 KEN HENDERSON L 23/36 10 56 17.85 5 DAN COFFIN W 35/14 11 34 32.35 2 GLEN ROBINSON W 35/33 12 50 24.00 6 JOE OLIVER W 35/27 10 66 15.15 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 88 498 17.67 5** DAN COFFIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOE OLIVER W 35/28 14 56 25.00 2 GLEN ROBINSON L 11/37 4 38 10.52 4 CLIFF MILLER W 35/11 11 40 27.50 1 NICK CULIC L 30/35 12 42 28.57 3 KEN HENDERSON L 17/35 6 42 14.28 6 JOE OLIVER L 31/35 11 74 14.86 2 GLEN ROBINSON W 37/15 16 52 30.76 4 CLIFF MILLER L 14/35 6 34 17.64 1 NICK CULIC L 12/36 5 34 14.70 3 KEN HENDERSON L 24/35 7 50 14.00 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 92 462 19.91 6** JOE OLIVER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DAN COFFIN L 28/35 12 56 21.42 1 NICK CULIC L 25/35 7 52 13.46 2 GLEN ROBINSON L 18/39 3 48 6.25 3 KEN HENDERSON W 35/33 7 64 10.93 4 CLIFF MILLER W 35/31 11 62 17.74 5 DAN COFFIN W 35/31 14 74 18.91 1 NICK CULIC L 8/39 5 42 11.90 2 GLEN ROBINSON L 23/40 6 58 10.34 3 KEN HENDERSON L 32/35 14 62 22.58 4 CLIFF MILLER L 27/35 5 66 7.57 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 84 584 14.38 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 MEN - CLASS E (25Pts/40Sh) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DALE DONAHUE BC 2232 8 4 239 66 454 14.53% 2 PHIL KREPPS BC 1460 7 5 234 53 450 11.77% 3* CLIFF HALL BC 0000 5 7 221 51 460 11.08% 4* STEW RICHARDS BC 0000 5 7 227 48 458 10.48% 5* GEORGE TAYLOR BC 0000 5 7 167 31 438 7.07% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DALE DONAHUE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 STEW RICHARDS L 10/25 3 30 10.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR L 17/20 4 40 10.00 3 CLIFF HALL W 25/16 6 34 17.64 2 PHIL KREPPS W 20/17 8 40 20.00 4 STEW RICHARDS W 22/16 7 40 17.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 25/4 8 32 25.00 3 CLIFF HALL W 21/12 4 40 10.00 2 PHIL KREPPS W 19/18 6 44 13.63 4 STEW RICHARDS W 25/16 7 34 20.58 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 25/9 6 40 15.00 3 CLIFF HALL L 16/20 4 40 10.00 2 PHIL KREPPS L 14/15 3 40 7.50 (Was 15%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 66 454 14.53 2 PHIL KREPPS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 25/9 5 30 16.66 4 STEW RICHARDS W 20/17 6 40 15.00 3 CLIFF HALL W 20/11 3 40 7.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DALE DONAHUE L 17/20 6 40 15.00 5 GEORGE TAYLOR L 11/25 2 34 5.88 4 STEW RICHARDS L 20/27 5 36 13.88 3 CLIFF HALL W 25/14 5 32 15.62 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DALE DONAHUE L 18/19 5 44 11.36 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 27/8 7 34 20.58 4 STEW RICHARDS W 18/12 4 40 10.00 3 CLIFF HALL L 18/23 3 40 7.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 DALE DONAHUE W 15/14 2 40 5.00 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 53 450 11.77 3* CLIFF HALL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 23/11 6 40 15.00 2 PHIL KREPPS L 11/20 4 40 10.00 1 DALE DONAHUE L 16/25 3 34 8.82 4 STEW RICHARDS L 11/13 1 40 2.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR L 17/22 2 40 5.00 2 PHIL KREPPS L 14/25 3 32 9.37 1 DALE DONAHUE L 12/21 3 40 7.50 4 STEW RICHARDS W 26/16 7 38 18.42 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 26/9 6 32 18.75 2 PHIL KREPPS W 23/18 5 40 12.50 1 DALE DONAHUE W 20/16 6 40 15.00 4 STEW RICHARDS L 22/26 5 44 11.36 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 51 460 11.08 4* STEW RICHARDS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DALE DONAHUE W 25/10 7 30 23.33 2 PHIL KREPPS L 17/20 7 40 17.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR W 26/5 6 36 16.66 3 CLIFF HALL W 13/11 1 40 2.50 1 DALE DONAHUE L 16/22 4 40 10.00 2 PHIL KREPPS W 27/20 5 36 13.88 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR L 17/25 2 40 5.00 3 CLIFF HALL L 16/26 3 38 7.89 1 DALE DONAHUE L 16/25 3 34 8.82 2 PHIL KREPPS L 12/18 2 40 5.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 GEORGE TAYLOR L 16/20 3 40 7.50 3 CLIFF HALL W 26/22 5 44 11.36 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 48 458 10.48 5* GEORGE TAYLOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 PHIL KREPPS L 9/25 2 30 6.66 3 CLIFF HALL L 11/23 2 40 5.00 1 DALE DONAHUE W 20/17 3 40 7.50 4 STEW RICHARDS L 5/26 1 36 2.77 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 PHIL KREPPS W 25/11 5 34 14.70 3 CLIFF HALL W 22/17 4 40 10.00 1 DALE DONAHUE L 4/25 1 32 3.12 4 STEW RICHARDS W 25/17 6 40 15.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 PHIL KREPPS L 8/27 2 34 5.88 3 CLIFF HALL L 9/26 3 32 9.37 1 DALE DONAHUE L 9/25 0 40 None 4 STEW RICHARDS W 20/16 2 40 5.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 10%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 31 438 7.07 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 WILF GREGORY BC 3293 11 1 480 346 574 60.27% 2* NEIL YASKOW BC 3136 6 6 446 345 612 56.37% 3* MURRAY RAYNER BC 4856 6 6 364 297 550 54.00% 4* MEL MCCLELLAND BC 4769 6 6 380 269 580 46.37% 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY BC 1502 1 11 218 168 480 35.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 WILF GREGORY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 NEIL YASKOW L 23/41 22 44 50.00 4 MEL MCCLELLAND W 42/21 25 42 59.52 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/34 37 60 61.66 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/22 38 56 67.85 2 NEIL YASKOW W 42/28 31 48 64.58 4 MEL MCCLELLAND W 41/32 39 60 65.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 43/23 20 38 52.63 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/13 24 38 63.15 2 NEIL YASKOW W 42/33 46 68 67.64 4 MEL MCCLELLAND W 45/20 25 44 56.81 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/10 15 32 46.87 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/26 24 44 54.54 (Was 63%) TOTALS W 11 L 1 346 574 60.27 2* NEIL YASKOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 WILF GREGORY W 41/23 27 44 61.36 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/10 21 44 47.72 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 37/41 46 70 65.71 4 MEL MCCLELLAND W 40/28 25 44 56.81 1 WILF GREGORY L 28/42 26 48 54.16 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 22/43 15 34 44.11 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 36/41 32 62 51.61 4 MEL MCCLELLAND W 44/28 32 54 59.25 1 WILF GREGORY L 33/42 44 68 64.70 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/0 17 30 56.66 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 43/11 30 46 65.21 4 MEL MCCLELLAND L 39/43 30 68 44.11 (Was 61%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 345 612 56.37 3* MURRAY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/7 23 38 60.52 4 MEL MCCLELLAND W 40/7 23 32 71.87 2 NEIL YASKOW W 41/37 48 70 68.57 1 WILF GREGORY L 22/41 33 56 58.92 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/6 18 30 60.00 4 MEL MCCLELLAND L 30/40 26 58 44.82 2 NEIL YASKOW W 41/36 33 62 53.22 1 WILF GREGORY L 13/40 17 38 44.73 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/7 22 36 61.11 4 MEL MCCLELLAND L 18/40 14 40 35.00 2 NEIL YASKOW L 11/43 20 46 43.47 1 WILF GREGORY L 26/40 20 44 45.45 (Was 67%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 297 550 54.00 4* MEL MCCLELLAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/25 16 36 44.44 1 WILF GREGORY L 21/42 17 42 40.47 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 7/40 11 32 34.37 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 NEIL YASKOW L 28/40 21 44 47.72 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/39 22 52 42.30 1 WILF GREGORY L 32/41 35 60 58.33 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/30 27 58 46.55 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 NEIL YASKOW L 28/44 27 54 50.00 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/14 22 50 44.00 1 WILF GREGORY L 20/45 18 44 40.90 3 MURRAY RAYNER W 40/18 21 40 52.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 NEIL YASKOW W 43/39 32 68 47.05 (Was 55%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 269 580 46.37 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 MEL MCCLELLAND L 25/41 10 36 27.77 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 7/41 12 38 31.57 2 NEIL YASKOW L 10/42 11 44 25.00 1 WILF GREGORY L 34/41 35 60 58.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 MEL MCCLELLAND L 39/40 23 52 44.23 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 6/40 7 30 23.33 2 NEIL YASKOW W 43/22 21 34 61.76 1 WILF GREGORY L 23/43 14 38 36.84 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 MEL MCCLELLAND L 14/40 15 50 30.00 3 MURRAY RAYNER L 7/41 10 36 27.77 2 NEIL YASKOW L 0/41 5 30 16.66 1 WILF GREGORY L 10/40 5 32 15.62 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 53%) TOTALS W 1 L 11 168 480 35.00 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ANDY DANYLEYKO BC 9758 9 3 434 242 560 43.21% 2* JOHN THORNTON BC 0678 7 4 364 213 478 44.56% 3* OSCAR HOYSETH BC 3171 7 4 396 225 518 43.43% 4 EARLE GILLARD BC 4212 4 6 323 187 450 41.55% 5 TED PETERS BC 4811 3 7 295 155 486 31.89% 6 MARCEL PINETTE BC 4210 2 8 174 79 392 20.15% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ANDY DANYLEYKO - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 EARLE GILLARD W 42/33 19 50 38.00 3 OSCAR HOYSETH L 26/42 22 56 39.28 6 MARCEL PINETTE W 40/16 18 40 45.00 2 JOHN THORNTON L 18/40 16 42 38.09 5 TED PETERS W 41/18 20 40 50.00 4 EARLE GILLARD W 40/26 26 54 48.14 3 OSCAR HOYSETH L 15/41 19 48 39.58 6 MARCEL PINETTE W 40/9 12 30 40.00 2 JOHN THORNTON W 40/17 20 34 58.82 5 TED PETERS W 42/24 19 48 39.58 3 OSCAR HOYSETH W 45/36 28 58 48.27 2 JOHN THORNTON W 45/34 23 60 38.33 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 9 L 3 242 560 43.21 2* JOHN THORNTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 MARCEL PINETTE W 40/19 19 46 41.30 4 EARLE GILLARD W 40/20 25 46 54.34 5 TED PETERS W 40/11 18 36 50.00 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 40/18 23 42 54.76 3 OSCAR HOYSETH W 40/11 24 40 60.00 6 MARCEL PINETTE W 40/13 12 32 37.50 4 EARLE GILLARD L 3/40 11 34 32.35 5 TED PETERS W 41/25 25 52 48.07 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 17/40 13 34 38.23 3 OSCAR HOYSETH L 29/41 23 56 41.07 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 34/45 20 60 33.33 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 213 478 44.56 3* OSCAR HOYSETH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 TED PETERS L 33/43 22 62 35.48 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 42/26 25 56 44.64 4 EARLE GILLARD W 40/14 24 38 63.15 6 MARCEL PINETTE W 42/12 13 38 34.21 2 JOHN THORNTON L 11/40 13 40 32.50 5 TED PETERS W 41/31 15 44 34.09 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO W 41/15 26 48 54.16 4 EARLE GILLARD L 29/43 19 46 41.30 6 MARCEL PINETTE W 40/5 16 32 50.00 2 JOHN THORNTON W 41/29 26 56 46.42 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 36/45 26 58 44.82 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 47%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 225 518 43.43 4 EARLE GILLARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 33/42 16 50 32.00 2 JOHN THORNTON L 20/40 17 46 36.95 3 OSCAR HOYSETH L 14/40 15 38 39.47 5 TED PETERS L 32/40 22 54 40.74 6 MARCEL PINETTE L 29/44 11 46 23.91 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 26/40 22 54 40.74 2 JOHN THORNTON W 40/3 23 34 67.64 3 OSCAR HOYSETH W 43/29 24 46 52.17 5 TED PETERS W 44/31 23 52 44.23 6 MARCEL PINETTE W 42/1 14 30 46.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 43%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 187 450 41.55 5 TED PETERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 OSCAR HOYSETH W 43/33 23 62 37.09 6 MARCEL PINETTE L 32/41 13 60 21.66 2 JOHN THORNTON L 11/40 8 36 22.22 4 EARLE GILLARD W 40/32 22 54 40.74 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 18/41 11 40 27.50 3 OSCAR HOYSETH L 31/41 12 44 27.27 6 MARCEL PINETTE W 40/14 17 38 44.73 2 JOHN THORNTON L 25/41 20 52 38.46 4 EARLE GILLARD L 31/44 17 52 32.69 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 24/42 12 48 25.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 155 486 31.89 6 MARCEL PINETTE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JOHN THORNTON L 19/40 10 46 21.73 5 TED PETERS W 41/32 14 60 23.33 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 16/40 10 40 25.00 3 OSCAR HOYSETH L 12/42 4 38 10.52 4 EARLE GILLARD W 44/29 17 46 36.95 2 JOHN THORNTON L 13/40 3 32 9.37 5 TED PETERS L 14/40 10 38 26.31 1 ANDY DANYLEYKO L 9/40 3 30 10.00 3 OSCAR HOYSETH L 5/40 5 32 15.62 4 EARLE GILLARD L 1/42 3 30 10.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 44%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 79 392 20.15 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS C (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BILL MULOIN BC 9780 13 1 420 172 484 35.53% 2 KEN MOUNT BC 1145 10 4 388 172 516 33.33% 3 DICK HOPKINS BC 3159 9 5 359 173 500 34.60% 4 GARRY RAYNER BC 0740 8 6 329 106 456 23.24% 5 LEWIS BEETON BC 1106 7 7 346 115 534 21.53% 6 JOHN MERRIMAN BC 0565 5 9 285 85 584 14.55% 7 JIM SEXSMITH BC 1901 4 10 290 112 566 19.78% 8 ROGER HELGESON BC 1812 0 14 166 71 508 13.97% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BILL MULOIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 GARRY RAYNER W 30/6 13 30 43.33 3 DICK HOPKINS W 35/20 20 46 43.47 8 ROGER HELGESON W 30/3 9 28 32.14 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 33/26 13 42 30.95 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 32/22 14 46 30.43 2 KEN MOUNT W 31/10 16 36 44.44 5 LEWIS BEETON W 33/17 14 34 41.17 4 GARRY RAYNER L 10/31 6 32 18.75 3 DICK HOPKINS W 30/3 9 18 50.00 8 ROGER HELGESON W 30/5 8 28 28.57 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 32/18 12 38 31.57 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 31/5 11 26 42.30 2 KEN MOUNT W 32/28 15 44 34.09 5 LEWIS BEETON W 31/22 12 36 33.33 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 13 L 1 172 484 35.53 2 KEN MOUNT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 30/13 11 34 32.35 8 ROGER HELGESON W 30/11 11 32 34.37 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 33/8 13 38 34.21 3 DICK HOPKINS L 19/30 15 42 35.71 5 LEWIS BEETON W 33/14 10 28 35.71 1 BILL MULOIN L 10/31 10 36 27.77 4 GARRY RAYNER W 31/18 14 30 46.66 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 30/16 13 32 40.62 8 ROGER HELGESON W 32/15 12 44 27.27 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 32/22 13 46 28.26 3 DICK HOPKINS W 30/8 15 32 46.87 5 LEWIS BEETON W 30/19 10 44 22.72 1 BILL MULOIN L 28/32 15 44 34.09 4 GARRY RAYNER L 20/31 10 34 29.41 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 10 L 4 172 516 33.33 3 DICK HOPKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 ROGER HELGESON W 31/13 12 36 33.33 1 BILL MULOIN L 20/35 16 46 34.78 5 LEWIS BEETON L 27/31 13 36 36.11 2 KEN MOUNT W 30/19 19 42 45.23 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 30/13 12 38 31.57 4 GARRY RAYNER W 30/15 14 32 43.75 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 30/11 15 34 44.11 8 ROGER HELGESON W 34/3 13 28 46.42 1 BILL MULOIN L 3/30 2 18 11.11 5 LEWIS BEETON L 22/33 12 46 26.08 2 KEN MOUNT L 8/30 9 32 28.12 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 32/6 10 34 29.41 4 GARRY RAYNER W 30/1 10 34 29.41 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 32/20 16 44 36.36 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 9 L 5 173 500 34.60 4 GARRY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BILL MULOIN L 6/30 5 30 16.66 7 JIM SEXSMITH L 26/32 8 48 16.66 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 31/13 6 36 16.66 5 LEWIS BEETON L 16/32 2 36 5.55 8 ROGER HELGESON W 30/7 9 32 28.12 3 DICK HOPKINS L 15/30 8 32 25.00 2 KEN MOUNT L 18/31 9 30 30.00 1 BILL MULOIN W 31/10 10 32 31.25 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 31/24 7 40 17.50 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 30/9 10 24 41.66 5 LEWIS BEETON W 30/1 9 20 45.00 8 ROGER HELGESON W 33/8 8 28 28.57 3 DICK HOPKINS L 1/30 2 34 5.88 2 KEN MOUNT W 31/20 13 34 38.23 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 8 L 6 106 456 23.24 5 LEWIS BEETON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 30/14 9 38 23.68 6 JOHN MERRIMAN L 28/32 7 56 12.50 3 DICK HOPKINS W 31/27 12 36 33.33 4 GARRY RAYNER W 32/16 9 36 25.00 2 KEN MOUNT L 14/33 5 28 17.85 8 ROGER HELGESON W 30/11 11 32 34.37 1 BILL MULOIN L 17/33 8 34 23.52 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 31/14 9 42 21.42 6 JOHN MERRIMAN L 28/30 7 40 17.50 3 DICK HOPKINS W 33/22 14 46 30.43 4 GARRY RAYNER L 1/30 1 20 5.00 2 KEN MOUNT L 19/30 6 44 13.63 8 ROGER HELGESON W 30/26 9 46 19.56 1 BILL MULOIN L 22/31 8 36 22.22 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 7 L 7 115 534 21.53 6 JOHN MERRIMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 KEN MOUNT L 13/30 5 34 14.70 5 LEWIS BEETON W 32/28 11 56 19.64 4 GARRY RAYNER L 13/31 3 36 8.33 1 BILL MULOIN L 26/33 7 42 16.66 3 DICK HOPKINS L 13/30 4 38 10.52 7 JIM SEXSMITH L 17/32 6 42 14.28 8 ROGER HELGESON W 31/20 10 50 20.00 2 KEN MOUNT L 16/30 6 32 18.75 5 LEWIS BEETON W 30/28 7 40 17.50 4 GARRY RAYNER L 9/30 5 24 20.83 1 BILL MULOIN L 18/32 6 38 15.78 3 DICK HOPKINS L 6/32 1 34 2.94 7 JIM SEXSMITH W 30/23 5 58 8.62 8 ROGER HELGESON W 31/29 9 60 15.00 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 5 L 9 85 584 14.55 7 JIM SEXSMITH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LEWIS BEETON L 14/30 5 38 13.15 4 GARRY RAYNER W 32/26 12 48 25.00 2 KEN MOUNT L 8/33 5 38 13.15 8 ROGER HELGESON W 32/6 10 30 33.33 1 BILL MULOIN L 22/32 9 46 19.56 6 JOHN MERRIMAN W 32/17 12 42 28.57 3 DICK HOPKINS L 11/30 8 34 23.52 5 LEWIS BEETON L 14/31 5 42 11.90 4 GARRY RAYNER L 24/31 7 40 17.50 2 KEN MOUNT L 22/32 7 46 15.21 8 ROGER HELGESON W 31/9 13 34 38.23 1 BILL MULOIN L 5/31 4 26 15.38 6 JOHN MERRIMAN L 23/30 6 58 10.34 3 DICK HOPKINS L 20/32 9 44 20.45 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 4 L 10 112 566 19.78 8 ROGER HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DICK HOPKINS L 13/31 5 36 13.88 2 KEN MOUNT L 11/30 3 32 9.37 1 BILL MULOIN L 3/30 1 28 3.57 7 JIM SEXSMITH L 6/32 3 30 10.00 4 GARRY RAYNER L 7/30 4 32 12.50 5 LEWIS BEETON L 11/30 7 32 21.87 6 JOHN MERRIMAN L 20/31 10 50 20.00 3 DICK HOPKINS L 3/34 3 28 10.71 2 KEN MOUNT L 15/32 6 44 13.63 1 BILL MULOIN L 5/30 2 28 7.14 7 JIM SEXSMITH L 9/31 7 34 20.58 4 GARRY RAYNER L 8/33 1 28 3.57 5 LEWIS BEETON L 26/30 10 46 21.73 6 JOHN MERRIMAN L 29/31 9 60 15.00 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 0 L 14 71 508 13.97 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION BC INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 21, 2005 JUNIOR GIRLS - CLASS A (30 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 09:27 ON 05/28/05 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER ALTA 0509 8 4 0 131 424 30.89% 2 - - BC 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER - ALTA OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 - - 2 - - 2 - - 2 - - 2 - - 2 - - (Was 30%) TOTALS W 0 L 0 131 424 30.89 2 - - - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER 1 RAQUEL SCHAEFER (Was 0%) TOTALS W 0 L 0 0 0 None This Class pitched during Shift 1 on Day 1 of this 2 Day Tournament